And to “predict” future balances. Sure a sheet can do that but I have always found a visual calendar works best with my adhd.
Firefly III: A free and open source personal finance manager
41–50 of 160 posts
Re: Firefly III: A free and open source personal finance manager
#42My biggest gripe with my Firefly workflow is how difficult it is to automatically handle Amazon orders. I’ve setup rules to automatically organize/label the various types of transactions that I export from banks to CSVs, but having to break down Amazon orders is a tedious nightmare. If anyone has any ideas for how to automate this, please share. One idea is to have Puppeteer just open the order page and get the invoi…
It’s fairly detailed. One issue is that matching refunds to line items can be ambiguous.
I have a side project that does a best effort match, when I get around to completing it I’ll publish it. If you build it before me please share :)
Re: Firefly III: A free and open source personal finance manager
#43While exploring some other self hosted/OSS personal finance tools, found https://github.com/actualbudget/actual to be a promising project too.
I've been using this as a replacement for YNAB and I don't miss anything. After evaluating Firefly for six months, I would say its setup isn't easy.
Re: Firefly III: A free and open source personal finance manager
#44The author has a weird take on zero based budgeting [0]. To me it seems like a distinction without a difference. I never did try Firefly because at first it wasn't very mature and then later I found Actual Budget, which is (or at least was) perfect. (I haven't transitioned to the open source version yet, so I'm not sure if they broke it.) [0] https://docs.firefly-iii.org/explanation/firefly-iii/backgro...
The difference isn't very big, but I honestly (I wrote that page) believe that the difference is worth pointing out.
However, I'd like to understand how you ended up where you are. How'd you somehow end up so burned by zero-based or envelope-based budgeting? FWIW, I've come from a traditional budgeting method and migrated to a zero-based and both can work.
> But also keep in mind: it's harder to spend less money with zero-based budgeting.
I'd argue the opposite is a problem with traditional budgeting methods: you're budgeting money you don't yet have. Yes, you might get it, but you don't until you have it. More importantly, how? How is it harder to spend less?
> It's harder to get a feeling for your financial situation with zero-based budgeting [..]
What? With envelope-based budgeting the colloquial jobs that your money has must be defined. You have to acknowledge exactly what you have and what you don't have, because you can't play with imaginary money. If you don't have enough money to put aside for rent next month, you know you don't have that money or you're not willing to spend it.
How?
> it's especially harder to change anything
In my own experience, when it's hard to change your budget with envelope-based budgets it's usually because you're constrained in your money. The exception to this has been financial investments: you can use tools like YNAB for it, but they're not created for forecasting or any of that stuff -- you're here for your here and now.
In a way, I think you're absolutely correct that it's harder to change anything, but not because the method is wrong; it's because it addresses the fundamental issue of traditional budgeting and it's difficult and tough to deal with the consequences: you can only budget the money you actually have. You can't make up numbers about what a month usually looks like.
If you want to feel safe about next month's rent, the only way is to have next month's rent budgeted. Thus, isn't harder better if harder is actual change as opposed to imaginary?
I am left with a sour taste that you not only decide to talk about things like paycheck to paycheck, but also combine it with a conclusion that says:
> Use Firefly III. Use GnuCash. Use anything from this list. But skip the zero-based nonsense.
I think you'd be better off acknowledging the different audiences more-so than categorising zero-based budgeting as nonsense.
I'm not even going to touch the question of recommending someone to use GnuCash as an alternative to zero-based budgeting.
Re: Firefly III: A free and open source personal finance manager
#45It's not that FIII is bad at was it was doing, but simply Actual was a bit faster, a bit simpler, a bit more practical to use when importing. I'm mostly using rules, categories and reporting.
Re: Firefly III: A free and open source personal finance manager
#46This looks like exactly the kind of thing I've been searching for! Curious about testimonials if anyone's used it
And for what I use it just works. I don't have any complains, docs are good, plenty of tutorial available and it is easy enough to setup and update (I don't use docker for it). I can't ask more of a software tbh.
[1]: https://docs.firefly-iii.org/how-to/firefly-iii/features/rul...
Re: Firefly III: A free and open source personal finance manager
#47That's the most annoying part for me: accounting, docs (files) management, notes are things that last many years, sometimes an entire human adult/active life, having the ability to evolve from a tool to another, from a workflow to another not loosing nor painfully transitioning from past tools is a VERY big issue.
Because of that I fear any tool with a large codebase/many deps because a simple tool I can keep it myself if the upstream vanish, a complex one I can't.
Re: Firefly III: A free and open source personal finance manager
#48The author has a weird take on zero based budgeting [0]. To me it seems like a distinction without a difference. I never did try Firefly because at first it wasn't very mature and then later I found Actual Budget, which is (or at least was) perfect. (I haven't transitioned to the open source version yet, so I'm not sure if they broke it.) [0] https://docs.firefly-iii.org/explanation/firefly-iii/backgro...
I have been using the self-hosted ActualBudget for ~6 months and found it mostly perfect. The mobile version of the site is not complete but it's at least usable for managing transactions. The only drawback is no user accounts, but you can have multiple budgets. I was originally on YNAB4, and then financier.io for ~2 years.
Do you see any major drawback comparing to YNAB4?
Re: Firefly III: A free and open source personal finance manager
#49While exploring some other self hosted/OSS personal finance tools, found https://github.com/actualbudget/actual to be a promising project too.
Does actual support tracking assets in different currencies and split transactions? I'm hacking together a tool for myself that fits my needs, but I'd really be in the market for something that could replace gnucash or beancount for me
Re: Firefly III: A free and open source personal finance manager
#50Earlier quoted context omitted.
Does actual support tracking assets in different currencies and split transactions? I'm hacking together a tool for myself that fits my needs, but I'd really be in the market for something that could replace gnucash or beancount for me
Last I checked it didn't even have a notion of currency, let alone multiple currencies.