Live data from Hacker News

Firefly III: A free and open source personal finance manager

firefly-iii.org

41–50 of 160 posts

Re: Firefly III: A free and open source personal finance manager

#41
I’m always looking for a self hosted pocketsmith alternative with a calendar like it. Thats how I use it best. I know I buy crap so categories are meh. But being able to pop ahead a month and adjust a bill or expense schedule to better align with fortnightly pay helps me. It also helps to remind me what I have not paid.

And to “predict” future balances. Sure a sheet can do that but I have always found a visual calendar works best with my adhd.

Re: Firefly III: A free and open source personal finance manager

#42

My biggest gripe with my Firefly workflow is how difficult it is to automatically handle Amazon orders. I’ve setup rules to automatically organize/label the various types of transactions that I export from banks to CSVs, but having to break down Amazon orders is a tedious nightmare. If anyone has any ideas for how to automate this, please share. One idea is to have Puppeteer just open the order page and get the invoi…

Amazon has a data export here: https://www.amazon.com/gp/privacycentral/dsar/preview.html

It’s fairly detailed. One issue is that matching refunds to line items can be ambiguous.

I have a side project that does a best effort match, when I get around to completing it I’ll publish it. If you build it before me please share :)

Re: Firefly III: A free and open source personal finance manager

#43

While exploring some other self hosted/OSS personal finance tools, found https://github.com/actualbudget/actual to be a promising project too.

I've been using this as a replacement for YNAB and I don't miss anything. After evaluating Firefly for six months, I would say its setup isn't easy.

How easy is it to move data from YNAB to this? i.e. transactions, categories and accounts?

Re: Firefly III: A free and open source personal finance manager

#44
post #24
post #7

The author has a weird take on zero based budgeting [0]. To me it seems like a distinction without a difference. I never did try Firefly because at first it wasn't very mature and then later I found Actual Budget, which is (or at least was) perfect. (I haven't transitioned to the open source version yet, so I'm not sure if they broke it.) [0] https://docs.firefly-iii.org/explanation/firefly-iii/backgro...

The difference isn't very big, but I honestly (I wrote that page) believe that the difference is worth pointing out.

I struggle to read that page without wanting to ask follow-up questions. I know it's your personal opinion about finance, and I'm not actually expecting you to change your mind from these questions.

However, I'd like to understand how you ended up where you are. How'd you somehow end up so burned by zero-based or envelope-based budgeting? FWIW, I've come from a traditional budgeting method and migrated to a zero-based and both can work.

> But also keep in mind: it's harder to spend less money with zero-based budgeting.

I'd argue the opposite is a problem with traditional budgeting methods: you're budgeting money you don't yet have. Yes, you might get it, but you don't until you have it. More importantly, how? How is it harder to spend less?

> It's harder to get a feeling for your financial situation with zero-based budgeting [..]

What? With envelope-based budgeting the colloquial jobs that your money has must be defined. You have to acknowledge exactly what you have and what you don't have, because you can't play with imaginary money. If you don't have enough money to put aside for rent next month, you know you don't have that money or you're not willing to spend it.

How?

> it's especially harder to change anything

In my own experience, when it's hard to change your budget with envelope-based budgets it's usually because you're constrained in your money. The exception to this has been financial investments: you can use tools like YNAB for it, but they're not created for forecasting or any of that stuff -- you're here for your here and now.

In a way, I think you're absolutely correct that it's harder to change anything, but not because the method is wrong; it's because it addresses the fundamental issue of traditional budgeting and it's difficult and tough to deal with the consequences: you can only budget the money you actually have. You can't make up numbers about what a month usually looks like.

If you want to feel safe about next month's rent, the only way is to have next month's rent budgeted. Thus, isn't harder better if harder is actual change as opposed to imaginary?

I am left with a sour taste that you not only decide to talk about things like paycheck to paycheck, but also combine it with a conclusion that says:

> Use Firefly III. Use GnuCash. Use anything from this list. But skip the zero-based nonsense.

I think you'd be better off acknowledging the different audiences more-so than categorising zero-based budgeting as nonsense.

I'm not even going to touch the question of recommending someone to use GnuCash as an alternative to zero-based budgeting.

Re: Firefly III: A free and open source personal finance manager

#45
I'm a 5y user of Firefly-III, and was very happy with it. Unfortunately, JC5, I discovered Actual recently.

It's not that FIII is bad at was it was doing, but simply Actual was a bit faster, a bit simpler, a bit more practical to use when importing. I'm mostly using rules, categories and reporting.

Re: Firefly III: A free and open source personal finance manager

#46

This looks like exactly the kind of thing I've been searching for! Curious about testimonials if anyone's used it

I have been using for years now. I don't have big requirements for a personal finances software. I mainly use it for cataloging my expenses so I can have a overview to where my money goes. I created a script that pushes my bank account export and have a series of rules to tag it automatically[1] and that is it.

And for what I use it just works. I don't have any complains, docs are good, plenty of tutorial available and it is easy enough to setup and update (I don't use docker for it). I can't ask more of a software tbh.

[1]: https://docs.firefly-iii.org/how-to/firefly-iii/features/rul...

Re: Firefly III: A free and open source personal finance manager

#47
My problem honestly is the stability/future/import-export-ability of all accounting tools. So far I'm using BeanCount via org-mode using Fava just to have some eye-candy view since two years, it's not exactly comfortable, but it's flexible and effective enough. Switching tools was NOT, I've started with the simple HomeBank than GNUCash then Ledger (hledger, actually) than BeanCount, all switches was veeeeeery long, partially manual and painful enough that instead of having continuous accounting I've decide to close any year and restart via opening balances to been able in the future to switch tool keeping the old one for a while for previous records.

That's the most annoying part for me: accounting, docs (files) management, notes are things that last many years, sometimes an entire human adult/active life, having the ability to evolve from a tool to another, from a workflow to another not loosing nor painfully transitioning from past tools is a VERY big issue.

Because of that I fear any tool with a large codebase/many deps because a simple tool I can keep it myself if the upstream vanish, a complex one I can't.

Re: Firefly III: A free and open source personal finance manager

#48
post #9
post #7

The author has a weird take on zero based budgeting [0]. To me it seems like a distinction without a difference. I never did try Firefly because at first it wasn't very mature and then later I found Actual Budget, which is (or at least was) perfect. (I haven't transitioned to the open source version yet, so I'm not sure if they broke it.) [0] https://docs.firefly-iii.org/explanation/firefly-iii/backgro...

I have been using the self-hosted ActualBudget for ~6 months and found it mostly perfect. The mobile version of the site is not complete but it's at least usable for managing transactions. The only drawback is no user accounts, but you can have multiple budgets. I was originally on YNAB4, and then financier.io for ~2 years.

I've being using YNAB4 for about 10yrs now. But I miss a mobile version to report daily expenses.

Do you see any major drawback comparing to YNAB4?

Re: Firefly III: A free and open source personal finance manager

#49

While exploring some other self hosted/OSS personal finance tools, found https://github.com/actualbudget/actual to be a promising project too.

Does actual support tracking assets in different currencies and split transactions? I'm hacking together a tool for myself that fits my needs, but I'd really be in the market for something that could replace gnucash or beancount for me

Last I checked it didn't even have a notion of currency, let alone multiple currencies.

Re: Firefly III: A free and open source personal finance manager

#50
post #49

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Does actual support tracking assets in different currencies and split transactions? I'm hacking together a tool for myself that fits my needs, but I'd really be in the market for something that could replace gnucash or beancount for me

Last I checked it didn't even have a notion of currency, let alone multiple currencies.

Yep. The Transaction type has just an amount field: https://github.com/actualbudget/actual/blob/master/packages%...
Post reply on HN