Success depends on emotion management
41–50 of 58 posts
Re: Success depends on emotion management
#42"Your attitude determines your success" = I discriminate against people I don't like.
Re: Success depends on emotion management
#43Please can people stop using absolutist epithets like this. Managing your attitude, emotions, and the stories you tell yourself will help a lot . If you do it badly, it will increase your chances of failure. Doing it well will not determine your success. That’s just magical thinking. It will predispose you for success if the other conditions are right for it , but nothing more.
Re: Success depends on emotion management
#44Trolling.
Anyway your title is wrong. You forgot the word "not".
Re: Success depends on emotion management
#45Re: Success depends on emotion management
#46Earlier quoted context omitted.
It doesn't say anything about the inverse. You can simultaneously believe success is determined by yourself and failures are just bad luck. It's positive thinking. Some enjoy it, some don't.
You certainly _can_, and I'm all for positivity if it helps you, but don't you think there is a contradiction here? Again, if it helps go right ahead.
Re: Success depends on emotion management
#47Well I have a really bad attitude about everything, and I still am successful. Just saying.
Re: Success depends on emotion management
#48Well I have a really bad attitude about everything, and I still am successful. Just saying.
Re: Success depends on emotion management
#49Earlier quoted context omitted.
Because "your attitude determines your success" explicitly states that if you fail it is because of your attitude. People fail for many reasons, usually a combination of reasons. Attitude is just one factor. It is very comforting for people who are high on the social ladder to believe in a meritocracy: it lets one their successes are due to their superior character, and those who are on the bottom of the ladder are t…
It doesn't say anything about the inverse. You can simultaneously believe success is determined by yourself and failures are just bad luck. It's positive thinking. Some enjoy it, some don't.
If success is determined by positive thinking that seems like it strongly implies that success is a necessary and sufficient condition.
Which implies that a lack of success is a failure of attitude.
Admittedly, this is mostly a semantics game of what specifically "determines" means, but to me it strongly implies both necessary and sufficient.
Re: Success depends on emotion management
#50This is such an important lesson. The high order bit in any success is the decision to go for it. Determination is more important then anything. I worry greatly, about how young people today are thought, that's the world is stacked against them and especially for minorities and women. Its true that the world is a very unfair place, but to change it we need encouragement, not horror stories.
No, it's really not. If what you were saying was true, everyone who wanted to be a financially successful artist would be. The truth is there are such things as supply, demand, process, practice, mastery and logistics. To over-anthropomorphize these things based on "determination" is naive and hyperbolic. The truth is that consistency matters a lot more.
I stopped listening to people like you who think there's anything wrong with thinking the world is stacked against me, and especially for minorities and women. I stopped listening to people like you, who think we need encouragement, not horror stories. I used to listen to folks like you, but then I stopped. Instead, I listened to those horror stories. Shrank not away from them, held space for them and held fidelity to reality first and foremost.
And once I focused on the realism, I began to see things clearly. A lot more clearly than you. That's when my career began to take off and I began to make better art. Isn't that odd?
--
The problem is that to you, the youth are vehicle for your own hopes and aspirations. You don't stop and consider what they think from behind their own two eyes, you project your own parochial assumptions unto them. You forget that once upon a time, you were their age, and you would have found it patronizing to be treated with kid gloves. You don't treat them as equals. You treat them like a pet dog. I think that's wrong. Young people these days are a lot more capable than you think. And they face a really challenging world. It's immensely disrespectful to not treat them as equals, to presume they need "encouragement" -- let me ask you this, have you asked them what they need? Maybe you would be surprised.
I don't treat any of my friends or colleagues with kid gloves, certainly not the ones younger than me. They tell me about the state of the world and how unfair it is, and I listen. I ask them what /they/ need. Some of them need encouragement, but that's rarer than you'd think. Most of them want information. They want experience. Strategies. They want to be challenged, motivated, given interesting threads to explore and follow, collaborated with. They want to know what I did when I was in their shoes and went through the same pains, even if it's not exactly the same thing. Sometimes they want to work together on something cool so they can see how I operate. Maybe they just want an ear to listen to.
But they don't want to be condescended to, or patronizingly told that their problem is that they think the world is stacked against them when they need to think happy thoughts. And of course they wouldn't want that -- because to be told that is something that serves the person doing the telling, not the person who is listening.
So if you're saying anything like this to young people, I think you need to take a long hard look in the mirror. You are out of touch.