Live data from Hacker News

A bank security check that leaves you guessing your own name

theguardian.com

41–50 of 67 posts

Re: A bank security check that leaves you guessing your own name

#41
post #24
post #18

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yeah, but I dare you give out your account number to a random person. The bank security system here is ridiculous. I always stick to cashier's check for this very reason (and for accounting purpose).

But that's what people did, back in the day when they wrote checks to pay for things in store.

Back then you probably couldn't electronically withdraw money from someone's account with just the account number---it has become more sensitive later.

Re: A bank security check that leaves you guessing your own name

#43

At least this is explainable by designers not anticipating hard cases. I remember the shittiest app from HSBC (who, by the way, seem to be sleepwalking their way through retail banking, with no direction from anyone who cares), which asked: "What is the answer to your chosen secret question?"

They rightly thought that showing the question could give away the answer, and thus decided to make that secret.

Then why is it even available as a choice?

Re: A bank security check that leaves you guessing your own name

#44
I'm experiencing a similar problem at Citibank here in the US. When I add a new bill payee, it tries to verify that I am really me. The website does this by asking me specific questions about my past (gleamed from various records) that, presumably, only I would know the right answers to. Among those questions are things like "In what city does your mother live?"

It sounds like a good idea, until I found out that the correct answers are considered to be incorrect by their system. I'm sorry, but I know where my mother lives, and she has lived there for decades. You got your data wrong, that's not my fault. When I answer the question correctly, it therefore locks me out of my account entirely, and I have to call Citibank to get my account unlocked. Helpfully, when you get locked out of your own Citibank account, anytime you try to log in the website delivers a plain-text "HTTP 403 Error" without any explanation. I had to deduce myself that it was because I "incorrectly" answered the question about me correctly.

I asked Citibank's customer service how to resolve this. I was eventually routed all the way to the top of their organization. Their best answer was that I should file a request with LexisNexis, the huge corporation that aggregates these data records on people using automated tools, to have the "official" answers changed.

That made me laugh. They want to place that burden on me?

So now I just do the whole dance every time I need to add a bill payee. Answer their questions correctly, get locked out because they think it's incorrect, then call customer service to get my account unlocked and to add the payee manually.

Does anyone know a good alternative bank?

Re: A bank security check that leaves you guessing your own name

#45

At least this is explainable by designers not anticipating hard cases. I remember the shittiest app from HSBC (who, by the way, seem to be sleepwalking their way through retail banking, with no direction from anyone who cares), which asked: "What is the answer to your chosen secret question?"

Ah, about 12 years ago, in India they used to have people choose two passwords. You would fill out the primary password in full, and then fill in specific characters (1st, 4th, 7th for eg) of the second password as a "second factor." I used to have to type out the full password on an editor and then fill in the right values.

They also sent out a free RSA token for logins when they deprecated this system. It was first sent to "privilege banking" customers like me. And then they forgot that they sent them out, and tried to get me to pay for a new one. They were insistent that the token wasn't sent out at all. Ended up cancelling that credit card.

Re: A bank security check that leaves you guessing your own name

#46

At least this is explainable by designers not anticipating hard cases. I remember the shittiest app from HSBC (who, by the way, seem to be sleepwalking their way through retail banking, with no direction from anyone who cares), which asked: "What is the answer to your chosen secret question?"

It's dumbfounding how awful bank websites are at security. They started with the stupidest conceivable way to implement two-factor--a second clear-text password that is an answer to a very small number of secret questions. Then they limited the secret questions to things people could find out about you on Facebook, then on top of that added secret questions about esoteric crap like your father's mother's childhood ne…

Don’t forget security images! Don’t put your password in unless you see the random picture!

Re: A bank security check that leaves you guessing your own name

#47

At least this is explainable by designers not anticipating hard cases. I remember the shittiest app from HSBC (who, by the way, seem to be sleepwalking their way through retail banking, with no direction from anyone who cares), which asked: "What is the answer to your chosen secret question?"

That's equivalent to asking you to enter a second password. It's OK and more secure than hinting about that password (example: the name of a city, the name of a woman, etc)

I remember that in a similar case I generated a random string with my password manager but I don't remember for which account. I hope it was one for I'll never have to spell that on a phone.

Re: A bank security check that leaves you guessing your own name

#48
post #31

Hmm, although it sounds like this was intended to prevent fraud, to me it almost sounds like it was intended to prevent accidental missends, like this: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21729875 > “I lost my inheritance with one wrong digit on my sort code”

Now I understand, this is done to protect the banks from the legal fees they might have to cover. (In the linked story bank paid thousands in legal fees). The warning during the transfer also makes sense now. I.e. we provided you with means to check the identity and warned you when we couldn’t confirm it, so the erroneous transfer is now on you.

So the main user of that feature is the bank, not the bank customers.

Re: A bank security check that leaves you guessing your own name

#49

It's never wrong to review that famous and ever-relevant essay, Falsehoods Programmers Believe About Names , and for which there has been oodles of prior discussion on this forum: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1438472 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12450825 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21492464 Original at https://www.kalzumeus.com/2010/06/17/falsehoods-programmers-...

And many other similar "falsehoods", collected at https://github.com/kdeldycke/awesome-falsehood

Re: A bank security check that leaves you guessing your own name

#50

Singapore has this figured out, it's not THAT hard, especially when you have a solid national identity / SSO design . You can use phone number or national ID number to register and that's all that is needed but you can set a display name freely if you don't want your name to leak via reverse lookup. Generating QR also is available right in app and accepted pretty much universal via the same app you can check in for c…

This is a different issue. It's not about verifying your own identity, it's about verifying the account number when making a payment to somebody else. The name on their account must exactly match the one that you entered or you get a warning.
Post reply on HN