Live data from Hacker News

If language began in the hands, why did it ever leave?

aeon.co

41–43 of 43 posts

Re: If language began in the hands, why did it ever leave?

#41
post #2

I wonder if this is related to why it's easy to learn touch typing while saying the keys out loud.

I didn't know it was. Can you direct me to some research there; I'm curious about that now.

Just speaking of my own experience.

Re: If language began in the hands, why did it ever leave?

#42
post #30

Earlier quoted context omitted.

(8) Animals communicate mainly via sound. Most don't even have hands.

(9) Talking in a group. It seems to me with gestures you can understand only one person at a time. Though maybe deaf people who use sign language have a good way to handle this.

This is a potential strength of hand signals, too, though. As the article mentions, voice is more of a broadcast medium, while hand signals would be a more discreet multicast kind of thing.

Re: If language began in the hands, why did it ever leave?

#43
post #41

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I didn't know it was. Can you direct me to some research there; I'm curious about that now.

Just speaking of my own experience.

Fair enough, thanks. I might try that.
Post reply on HN