Live data from Hacker News

New York Governor announces 100% workforce reduction for non-essential services

techcrunch.com

41–50 of 393 posts

Re: New York Governor announces 100% workforce reduction for non-essential services

#41
post #25

Why are the subways still open? Seems like low hanging fruit to close those.

On an interesting corollary, knowing what dangerously little I know about the MTA and its unions, are drivers griping about disease exposure? The NY subway is fairly labour-intensive as mass transit systems go...

Re: New York Governor announces 100% workforce reduction for non-essential services

#43
post #25

Why are the subways still open? Seems like low hanging fruit to close those.

Because without subways many of those essential services (including health care) stop functioning as workers can't get to their jobs. Then everything goes to hell as actual mass panic breaks out.

Seems to be little appreciation on the internet for the fact that even in this situation, a big chunk of the population still has to go to work otherwise everything will collapse.

Re: New York Governor announces 100% workforce reduction for non-essential services

#45
post #6

There is currently no plan in place to penalize individuals for gathering socially Then people won't take the rules seriously. Lots of people in this country still don't believe or understand how much damage this virus can inflict.

Legally, does the state and federal goverment have the power to control the movement of people? Does the state have the power to control my movement from my own home to the end of the street for my daily walk?

Wouldn't this fall under 'martial law'?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martial_law_in_the_United_Stat...

"The Privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it."

I guess the legal argument comes down to a lack of a comma between 'invasion' and 'the public safety'. Or whether a virus constitutes 'invasion'.

Re: New York Governor announces 100% workforce reduction for non-essential services

#46
To be clear, the governor unequivocally said this is not a shelter in place. It is merely language telling employers that they are to not have workers physically present.

The governor also said there will not be any civil penalties for individuals that do not stay at home.

Re: New York Governor announces 100% workforce reduction for non-essential services

#47
post #32

So that’s CA and NY both with shelter in place. Strange that WA hasn’t implemented it yet.

This seems to be a reaction to people not doing it on their own sufficiently enough, like what happened in Italy. Perhaps Washingtonians are taking the recommendations more seriously, so they don't require an official mandate. That decision can't be a light one, and I don't envy those that have to make it.

Re: New York Governor announces 100% workforce reduction for non-essential services

#48
post #39

Do they have a definition of what constitutes non-essential?

Yes, the order has a specific list.

EDIT: Here is the order.

https://www.governor.ny.gov/news/no-2026-continuing-temporar...

> Any essential business or entity providing essential services or functions shall not be subject to the in-person restrictions. This includes essential health care operations including research and laboratory services; essential infrastructure including utilities, telecommunication, airports and transportation infrastructure; essential manufacturing, including food processing and pharmaceuticals; essential retail including grocery stores and pharmacies; essential services including trash collection, mail, and shipping services; news media; banks and related financial institutions; providers of basic necessities to economically disadvantaged populations; construction; vendors of essential services necessary to maintain the safety, sanitation and essential operations of residences or other essential businesses; vendors that provide essential services or products, including logistics and technology support, child care and services needed to ensure the continuing operation of government agencies and provide for the health, safety and welfare of the public;

Re: New York Governor announces 100% workforce reduction for non-essential services

#49

Quote from NYTimes: > For days, Mayor Bill de Blasio of New York City has pushed for a “shelter in place” order and the governor has repeatedly dismissed the idea, saying he would not quarantine New Yorkers in their homes. He also spoke on a popular podcast earlier this week about DEFINITELY NOT taking this kind of action

The side effects of exponential growth. It changes minds quickly.

I think the growth is a result of a focused effort to ramp up testing. Meanwhile if we are to have any confidence in the numbers (we probably shouldn't), according to the John's Hopkins counts, New York state currently has a surprisingly low CFR.

38 deaths / 5715 cases = 0.7% CFR

Re: New York Governor announces 100% workforce reduction for non-essential services

#50
post #26
post #25

Why are the subways still open? Seems like low hanging fruit to close those.

My guess would be because it's how a lot of essential workers get to work.

It might be better for the state to close the subway and pay for Lyft for all essential workers. Creates jobs for the drivers, gets essential workers where they need to be, closes the major infection channel. The drivers would be required to wear surgical masks and wash the back seat of the car before each passenger.
Post reply on HN