Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Which makes their actions less evil than the article implies. And accusing the mother of having a history of mental illness in an attempt to get conservatorship when no such history exists? Sounds pretty damned evil to me. The road to hell is paved with good intentions. Even if they had their patient's best interests at heart, that doesn't excuse what they did.
We don't have any information on the parents at all. I know its good to give parents the benefit of the doubt, but these people could have been ignorant, suspicious and contrary. Or 100 other things, that make a trained physician wary of trusting them with anything as important as a critically ill patient.
I'm not sure what you read, but there is plenty of information about the parents. They are quoted, they have videos, they have facebook posts.
There is no reason to see them as mentally incompetent.
> could have been ignorant, suspicious and contrary.
Makes no difference. They have the right to stop medical treatment whenever they want. They have the right to leave the hospital and take their daughter whenever they want.
Not to mention the patient was over 18 and wanted to leave, and the hospital didn't let them.
> wary of trusting them with anything as important as a critically ill patient.
Too bad. Then you explain to them how to help her. The hospital has no legal right to hold someone prisoner.