Earlier quoted context omitted.
AFAIK, butter is still worse then no butter (and more calories from whole plant foods instead). Margarine may or may not be worse than butter (I think it is worse). It is better to avoid/reduce all refined fats (oils), except maybe for a high DHA omega 3 supplement. If you want to eat for health, look into WFPB, they have a lot of science on their side.
Getting definitive information on nutrition always seems to be a lot harder than it should be in 2018
Salt not as damaging to health as previously thought, says study
41–50 of 231 posts
Re: Salt not as damaging to health as previously thought, says study
#42Re: Salt not as damaging to health as previously thought, says study
#43I remember when butter was bad for you and my dad, who was great butter lover switched to a particular type of margarine that was marketed as being good for you. Later it turned out it had the wrong sort of fats in it. Then later again butter became OK again.
AFAIK, butter is still worse then no butter (and more calories from whole plant foods instead). Margarine may or may not be worse than butter (I think it is worse). It is better to avoid/reduce all refined fats (oils), except maybe for a high DHA omega 3 supplement. If you want to eat for health, look into WFPB, they have a lot of science on their side.
Re: Salt not as damaging to health as previously thought, says study
#44Scientific American was pounding this drum in 2011. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/its-time-to-end-t...
Re: Salt not as damaging to health as previously thought, says study
#45Earlier quoted context omitted.
AFAIK, butter is still worse then no butter (and more calories from whole plant foods instead). Margarine may or may not be worse than butter (I think it is worse). It is better to avoid/reduce all refined fats (oils), except maybe for a high DHA omega 3 supplement. If you want to eat for health, look into WFPB, they have a lot of science on their side.
Getting definitive information on nutrition always seems to be a lot harder than it should be in 2018
Re: Salt not as damaging to health as previously thought, says study
#46During the heat wave in France this summer, messages to old persons were to drink regularly (which sometimes they forget) So a quarter of medical consultations related to elders and heat was for a lack of salt [0]. From Google translate it’s call hyponatremia. So as stated in other comments, moderation, may be, lack, bad idea. I’m actually in Ireland. They seem to have taken the salt part very seriously, as everythin…
Re: Salt not as damaging to health as previously thought, says study
#47And more importantly, who paid to have the other x studies buried that found a different result?
Re: Salt not as damaging to health as previously thought, says study
#48And to play devil's advocate, the opposite findings from just this June https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/06/180622012101.h...
My understanding from reading the article is the lower threshold is higher than we think. There are still negative effects at what we consider high levels of salt intake.
They also mention same team who did this study published a previous study that met a lot a criticism and they apparently failed to address the criticisms.
So you should probably moderate your salt intake still.
Re: Salt not as damaging to health as previously thought, says study
#49I remember when butter was bad for you and my dad, who was great butter lover switched to a particular type of margarine that was marketed as being good for you. Later it turned out it had the wrong sort of fats in it. Then later again butter became OK again.
AFAIK, butter is still worse then no butter (and more calories from whole plant foods instead). Margarine may or may not be worse than butter (I think it is worse). It is better to avoid/reduce all refined fats (oils), except maybe for a high DHA omega 3 supplement. If you want to eat for health, look into WFPB, they have a lot of science on their side.
Re: Salt not as damaging to health as previously thought, says study
#50I remember when butter was bad for you and my dad, who was great butter lover switched to a particular type of margarine that was marketed as being good for you. Later it turned out it had the wrong sort of fats in it. Then later again butter became OK again.
AFAIK, butter is still worse then no butter (and more calories from whole plant foods instead). Margarine may or may not be worse than butter (I think it is worse). It is better to avoid/reduce all refined fats (oils), except maybe for a high DHA omega 3 supplement. If you want to eat for health, look into WFPB, they have a lot of science on their side.
Many would dispute this if you're alluding to it being heavy in saturated fat which there's heavy dispute over.
> Margarine may or may not be worse than butter (I think it is worse).
Doesn't seem consistent with your logic of less refined is better.
> If you want to eat for health, look into WFPB, they have a lot of science on their side.
So basically veganism. Pretty much a non-starter for most people.