Live data from Hacker News

Kraft Reveals Revamped Mac and Cheese, 50M Boxes Later

nytimes.com

41–50 of 192 posts

Re: Kraft Reveals Revamped Mac and Cheese, 50M Boxes Later

#41

Are Kraft and Mondelez the same company? They now own British chocolate company Cadbury and have received a lot of criticism for changing recipes there (amongst other things). http://www.telegraph.co.uk/food-and-drink/features/7-ways-ca...

Mondelez bought kraft iirc.

Re: Kraft Reveals Revamped Mac and Cheese, 50M Boxes Later

#42
post #9

... and this is why people with severe allergies always always always read the ingredients list, even if the packaging has not changed. And always carry emergency medication.

Isn't doing this illegal? Since it makes people think they're buying the same product they always have but it has actually changed.

At least in Brazil, every time the formula of a product, or the quantity in the package, is changed, companies have to disclose that on the packaging.

Re: Kraft Reveals Revamped Mac and Cheese, 50M Boxes Later

#43
post #42
post #9

... and this is why people with severe allergies always always always read the ingredients list, even if the packaging has not changed. And always carry emergency medication.

Isn't doing this illegal? Since it makes people think they're buying the same product they always have but it has actually changed. At least in Brazil, every time the formula of a product, or the quantity in the package, is changed, companies have to disclose that on the packaging.

It was disclosed on the packaging.

Re: Kraft Reveals Revamped Mac and Cheese, 50M Boxes Later

#44
post #30

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Would be a cool app project. "Scan" each label as you put it in your cart, and see if it rejects it or not

The problem is, the ingredients can change without the UPC code changing. You would need manufacturers to purchase and use unique UPC codes for each version of their food formulations.

Neither parent nor grandparent references UPC. Grandparent references the list of ingredients.

Re: Kraft Reveals Revamped Mac and Cheese, 50M Boxes Later

#45
post #42

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Isn't doing this illegal? Since it makes people think they're buying the same product they always have but it has actually changed. At least in Brazil, every time the formula of a product, or the quantity in the package, is changed, companies have to disclose that on the packaging.

It was disclosed on the packaging.

not the fact of the change itself

Re: Kraft Reveals Revamped Mac and Cheese, 50M Boxes Later

#46
post #42

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Isn't doing this illegal? Since it makes people think they're buying the same product they always have but it has actually changed. At least in Brazil, every time the formula of a product, or the quantity in the package, is changed, companies have to disclose that on the packaging.

It was disclosed on the packaging.

Then how come they only "announced" it now? Unless the disclosure was very discreet, I'd count it as an announcement.

Re: Kraft Reveals Revamped Mac and Cheese, 50M Boxes Later

#47
post #42
post #9

... and this is why people with severe allergies always always always read the ingredients list, even if the packaging has not changed. And always carry emergency medication.

Isn't doing this illegal? Since it makes people think they're buying the same product they always have but it has actually changed. At least in Brazil, every time the formula of a product, or the quantity in the package, is changed, companies have to disclose that on the packaging.

It is disclosed in the packaging. They just didn't do a big promotion prior to the change.

Re: Kraft Reveals Revamped Mac and Cheese, 50M Boxes Later

#48
post #46

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It was disclosed on the packaging.

Then how come they only "announced" it now? Unless the disclosure was very discreet, I'd count it as an announcement.

This is thoroughly explained in the article.

Re: Kraft Reveals Revamped Mac and Cheese, 50M Boxes Later

#49

Are Kraft and Mondelez the same company? They now own British chocolate company Cadbury and have received a lot of criticism for changing recipes there (amongst other things). http://www.telegraph.co.uk/food-and-drink/features/7-ways-ca...

It went something like this - my memory is a little hazy as this happened a few years ago: Kraft at the time owned Nabisco and had all of it's "snack" brands under the Nabisco umbrella. Mondelez and Kraft merged and then split all the "snack" brands off under Mondelez (this included Cadbury because Kraft had already taken them over). Then 3G capital came in and merged Kraft and Heinz and spun Mondelez completely off into its own company - all the Cadbury/Nabisco brands are under the Mondelez umbrella and Kraft/Heinz has the non-snack stuff.

Re: Kraft Reveals Revamped Mac and Cheese, 50M Boxes Later

#50
post #10
post #7

I don't remember new Pepsi, but new Coke had a huge backslash which lead to pulling the product off the market, reversing back to original formula. And if I remember correctly, this original Coke, dubbed Coca-Cola Classic saw much better sales than the same coke did before that. Making people wonder if the new coke fiasco wasn't intentional.

They didn't actually use the original formula. They used the opportunity to switch from Cane sugar to Corn Syrup. Since people didn't have the ability to taste the difference any more, no one noticed. This let them cut the cost of a major ingredient which then translated into profit. They gained a LOT more from the failed product.

The sweetener isn't part of the Coca-Cola formula (or more specifically, isn't part of the Coca-Cola concentrate). Coca-Cola provides unsweetened concentrate to independent bottlers, and the bottlers add high fructose corn syrup, sugar, or both during the bottling process. Some US Coca-Cola bottlers still only use sugar for sweetener.
Post reply on HN