Earlier quoted context omitted.
> I'm aware of a big cloud services provider (I won't name any names but it was IBM) that lost a fairly large amount of data. Permanently. So that too isn't a guarantee. Permanently losing data at a given store point isn't relevant to losing data overall. Data store failures are assumed or else there'd be no point in backups. What matters is whether failures in multiple points happen at the same time , which means a…
> Permanently losing data at a given store point isn't relevant to losing data overall. I can't reveal any details but it was a lot more than just a given storage point. The interesting thing is that there were multiple points along the way where the damage would have been recoverable but their absolute incompetence made matters much worse to the point where there were no options left. > FWIW there's no "simply" abou…
(If IBM was also running the local storage then we're talking about a very different risk profile from "run your own storage, back up to a cloud" and the anecdote is worth noting but not directly relevant.)