Live data from Hacker News

Credit card debt collection

bitsaboutmoney.com

391–400 of 568 posts

Re: Credit card debt collection

#391
post #377
post #347

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I can only reply that west of Hamburg, Karte means any kind of card. Credit card is explicitly Kreditkarte. I also speak German fluenty, including partial knowledge of some dialects, and Swiss German. Since my last time in Berlin was 10 years ago, I'll have to take it.

Even in the local Ämtern? In my experience they're the worst offenders here. For example, Zahlungsmöglichkeiten on these two pages: [1] "Am Standort kann bar und mit girocard (mit PIN) (ehemals EC-Karte) bezahlt werden." This means nothing with Visa/Mastercard, period. Doesn't matter if you have a direct debit account or revolving credit. If you try to pay with eg an N26 Debit Mastercard, they say "Leider akzeptieren…

When Kreditkarte are allowed, by definition, EC-Karte are as well.

When Girokarte/EC-Karte are accepted, there is no guarantee that Kreditkarte are as well.

Re: Credit card debt collection

#392
post #319

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> The reason is that in the event of a fraudulent charge Not sure if a fraudulent charge of a debit card is a thing I ever heard of in Europe. These cards have also been using chips for over 20 years. Maybe they work differently here. To me credit cards sound less secure than debit cards: debit cards have chips and pin codes. With credit cards, knowing the number is in theory enough (they have digital verification no…

That credit cards don't have PIN codes has nothing to do with them being credit cards vs debit cards, it's just a choice by the industry to not institute them.

It is less that cards don't have PINs for the chip, but that they still have magnetic stripes. It is still possible to skim the card info. I assume that there is mandate to update equipment but I still see registers with swipe. Issuers can distribute cards without magstripe in 2027. But they keep pushing the date out.

Re: Credit card debt collection

#393
post #356

There was a case a few year back around the time of the 2008 recession where a man in debt used the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act to earn a decent living from their aggressive/dishonest practices. I did try Googling for the story, but I could find it. His process was to let them lie to him - he even encouraged it, all while he was recording the call. After the call ended he'd launch a legal claim for compensatio…

Seems like that might not be possible these days. > On June 25, 2021, the Supreme Court of the United States held that a plaintiff must suffer a concrete injury resulting from a defendant’s statutory violation to have Article III standing to pursue damages from that defendant in federal court. The Court also held that plaintiffs in a class action must prove that every class member has standing for each claim asserted…

Meanwhile, a "website designer" who's never deployed a website, was never hired to create one and who suffered zero injury gets a ruling. This SCOTUS is invalid.

Re: Credit card debt collection

#394
post #356

There was a case a few year back around the time of the 2008 recession where a man in debt used the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act to earn a decent living from their aggressive/dishonest practices. I did try Googling for the story, but I could find it. His process was to let them lie to him - he even encouraged it, all while he was recording the call. After the call ended he'd launch a legal claim for compensatio…

Seems like that might not be possible these days. > On June 25, 2021, the Supreme Court of the United States held that a plaintiff must suffer a concrete injury resulting from a defendant’s statutory violation to have Article III standing to pursue damages from that defendant in federal court. The Court also held that plaintiffs in a class action must prove that every class member has standing for each claim asserted…

> that might not be possible these days

You’re most likely making these claims in state courts. Federal cases start at $25k.

Re: Credit card debt collection

#395

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Back in the early '10s I was reading a report from a guy who had stellar credit and the card limits to go with them. He ran up about $100,000 of debt on his cards on purpose and stopped making payments. He then approached his bank to settle the debt and negotiated a 60% discount. The account was marked "paid by customer" so it never appeared on his on his credit report as a default. He did get dinged for missing paym…

I have a family member who did something similar - perfect credit and defaulted on purpose. On a rental property, he was underwater on the mortgage at the time of the 2008 crash, so he simply stopped paying and let the bank foreclose and came out ahead that way. Trashed his credit rating but he never had any need for it, he had enough to buy his own house and car outright.

AKA 'jingle mail'

Re: Credit card debt collection

#396

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There is also in the Bible the notion of a 50 years periodic Jubilee[1] when all debts would be canceled and the system effectively resets. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jubilee_(biblical)

ha! It may be in the Bible, but Jubilee was never celebrated, not even once.

> Jubilee was never celebrated

Ancient societies of all stripes had periodic debt forgiveness. Ancient (pre-Christian) Rome, for example.

Re: Credit card debt collection

#397

> you, reader, use credit cards in preference to debit cards as a payment instrument Reader from Europe here. I use debit cards for daily payments, that's just the most standard expected payment method in Europe (with mobile payments now replacing it. Is a mobile payment app more like a debit or like a credit card? I have no idea actually!). But credit cards for online payments on the internet because (despite some d…

[In the UK] despite the verbiage on most sites still saying "credit card", I've been using ordinary debit cards (from both Visa and MC) online for as long as I've shopped online, and never had a single issue related to them being debit. For many years I didn't even have a credit card Edit: it's possible that this is an issue of semantics. My cards have been debit cards in every sense of the term - they are labelled a…

I think it's just inexact US terminology that has become global through the internet because they (IMO rightly) mostly use credit cards for normal purchases. My browser says it saves 'credit cards' - in reality it saves both credit and debit.

Re: Credit card debt collection

#398
post #393
post #356

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Seems like that might not be possible these days. > On June 25, 2021, the Supreme Court of the United States held that a plaintiff must suffer a concrete injury resulting from a defendant’s statutory violation to have Article III standing to pursue damages from that defendant in federal court. The Court also held that plaintiffs in a class action must prove that every class member has standing for each claim asserted…

Meanwhile, a "website designer" who's never deployed a website, was never hired to create one and who suffered zero injury gets a ruling. This SCOTUS is invalid.

[deleted]

Re: Credit card debt collection

#399
post #256
post #221

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Someone with poor credit may be assumed more likely to commit fraud or steal from the company. Someone with poor credit might also be assumed to be personally irresponsible and lazy, and more likely to slack off, ignore necessary details or cut corners. It isn't fair but in the US money carries moral weight, and many people assume the less of it you have, the worse of a person you are.

>It isn't fair but in the US money carries moral weight, and many people assume the less of it you have, the worse of a person you are. This isn't about money, this is about debt. Owing money around really does sound like something a bad person would do.

The presence of debt makes you more susceptible to bribes and blackmail.

Re: Credit card debt collection

#400

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I applied for a job at a gas station in the late 90's. The store manager had to get permission to run a credit check that I needed for the job: The dude explained that folks with bad credit were more likely to steal from the company. Which isn't true, of course, and they had other ways to check for theft - but this didn't stop them.

How is it not true? Do you have evidence refuting the premise that people with bad credit are more likely to skim cash from the till?

Do you?

Its been some years since I saw any reporting on it, and I'm honestly not going to spend the time to dig it up for a comment.

Post reply on HN