Live data from Hacker News

Microsoft to Acquire Activision Blizzard

news.microsoft.com

391–400 of 1001 posts

Re: Microsoft to Acquire Activision Blizzard

#391
post #199

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If they want to be all-in on game pass, then they should actually go all in. As somebody who just got game pass, I feel kinda cheated for what I get; All the games offered there are the “f2p” versions, even MS first party titles like Halo only offer the “default” versions to play “for free” when paying a monthly subscription. It’s like those free versions Epic hands out; They are playable, but they usually lack any a…

What is Halo missing? MCC and infinite have all the relevant content, unless you wanted a dress-up game instead of an FPS.

Pretty much all meaningful multiplayer customization. Past Halo titles let you unlock a variety of different armor styles, and colors, by just playing trough the singleplayer.

Now pretty much all of that is either locked behind "Deluxe edition", MTX or dozens of levels of season pass for a single item.

Which is particularly cynical considering how they advertised this Halo as the "most customizable ever, no two Spartans will look alike!" [0], when the only way not to look alike is to spend at least 10 bucks for a new armor core.

Want that new armor core in a different color? Enjoy spending another 8 bucks [1] because color schemes are now armor core specific.

This is objectively worse than what people used to get when they bought the "standard" version, as effectively all meaningful multiplayer customization is now paywalled behind a ton of MTX and not just the "nice extras".

Halo isn't the only offender on that front, pretty much all the games that nowadays get released with a "standard" 50-60 bucks version, and then a 100+ bucks deluxe version follow this very same MO. Which would be okay if those "deluxe version" actually offered the full package, but they don't, what they offer is the same extend of customization options that used to be included with games out of the box, while getting "everything" has by now come an exercise of unlimited spending [2] because creating unlimited new color swaps, with every new "season", is the new most profitable business model, not releasing a fully functional and fleshed out game out of the box, that's by now the absolute rare exception in the "AAA" sector.

This is also exactly what many people have been warning about where MTX will ultimately takes us for literally decades, game pass is the ultimate manifestation of it; You subscribe to "games as a service" with a monthly fee, then you are supposed to spend money on those rented games to upgrade them to proper fully fleshed out versions, and then you are locked into the subscription because not paying for it now also means losing access to all the content for the games you purchased on-top of your subscriptions.

Anybody who looks at this and goes; "This is great for consumers!" must not be a consumer and must have completely missed all the relevant discourse about these developments during the last decades.

[0] https://gamerant.com/halo-infinite-armor-customization-milli...

[1] https://gamerant.com/halo-infinite-charges-8-color-blue/

[2] https://www.gamingbible.co.uk/news/xbox-halo-infinite-shop-c...

Re: Microsoft to Acquire Activision Blizzard

#392

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Counterpoint: It's gaming. It is a space with a low barrier to (indie) entry and it is not part of some critical infrastructure. Maybe it is lamentable, but I am not sure antitrust would be my way to go for this.

It will be tough to sell $60 games when you can get the entire library of Microsoft games, plus their partner networks, for $10/month. Not to mention the potential platform abuses whereby MS can now gate their property behind Windows and Xbox. And I’m not even that creative. Surely MS will get a return on their $70,000,000,000 investment whether it’s better for the gaming economy and consumers, or not.

The games industry is trying to push $70 MSRP this generation, so I see the savings in Game Pass and potential pressure on standalone pricing to be good.

Given that nearly every popular $60 game now has microtransactions, loot boxes, (paid) season passes, and maybe even (paid) DLC, there's absolutely no reason for the price increase. They're already making buckets of cash (and turning a profit) at the "just $60" price point.

Re: Microsoft to Acquire Activision Blizzard

#393
post #53

With these kind of acquisitions, other companies are going to find it very hard to compete with Game Pass. I think we'll look back in 10 years and wonder why antitrust regulators did nothing, but it may be too late by then.

Blizzard is dead weight compared to the incredible profitability of Skylanders + CoD. I'd be willing to bet Blizzard gets spun off within a year.

Re: Microsoft to Acquire Activision Blizzard

#394

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I wonder if he realises what "fun" he's going to have over the next years cleaning out the cesspit that is Blizzard

Given that they plan to keep Bobby Kotick on, I don't think Microsoft understands the problem with ABK all that well.

The press release says they're keeping Kotick for the duration of the transition, then everyone will report to Phil Spencer. Seems likely that Kotick will be gone soon(ish)

Re: Microsoft to Acquire Activision Blizzard

#395
post #290

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Does CoD become an Xbox/Windows exclusive?

No chance. COD has consistently been a huge money maker on PS and Vanguard was #1 last year. They would lose out on way too much revenue, not to mention that massive negative sentiment that would bring towards Xbox and big game / console manufacturers. I think certain games like Halo and maybe some Bethesda will stay (ones that have previously been exclusive). But acquiring a AAA company and then cutting off half of…

Microsoft isn't Apple, they have been much more open as of late.

I doubt that existing franchises will become exclusive.

Re: Microsoft to Acquire Activision Blizzard

#396
post #53

With these kind of acquisitions, other companies are going to find it very hard to compete with Game Pass. I think we'll look back in 10 years and wonder why antitrust regulators did nothing, but it may be too late by then.

Very true, just like when Google bought DoubleClick. I couldn't believe that went through.

Re: Microsoft to Acquire Activision Blizzard

#399
post #258

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Steam Deck is Valve opening up an alternative to Microsoft land. This seems to put the writing on the wall for the Steam Deck though, right? How many people are really going to care about a Valve system that can't run any of the popular games from the MS catalog? I preordered the Steam Deck and plan to follow through with the purchase, but things look pretty dismal for Valve at this juncture. It seems like they're…

Why wouldn't it be able to? With the Proton compatibility layer almost all Windows-only games should run on it. And worst case scenario, one can dual boit Windows if Microsoft decide to be really aggressive vis à vis regulators and block their games from running on Proton.

Better yet.

You can run Game Pass directly in a browser. So you could use GamePass on really any modern web connected device.

I would be shocked if Microsoft supported the actual GamePass app on Linux

Post reply on HN