Live data from Hacker News

Ford F-150 Lightning outsold the Cybertruck and was then canceled for poor sales

electrek.co

361–370 of 1001 posts

Re: Ford F-150 Lightning outsold the Cybertruck and was then canceled for poor sales

#361

Earlier quoted context omitted.

2002 GMC Sierras did this, it was called quadrasteer

As did some models of Honda Prelude starting in '87.

whoa I was not aware of this, super cool

Re: Ford F-150 Lightning outsold the Cybertruck and was then canceled for poor sales

#362

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Now do the range/time/stops calculation with a travel trailer. Yes, if we're talking about normal family travel, an EV works fine for many trips (though there are still charging "dead spots" in parts of the country - looking at you WV). But, "truck stuff" like towing, they aren't there yet. Maybe in a few years when we get the next generation of battery and charger tech.

In truth you cannot really do this because range is a function of drag, not really weight. So if you are towing a 2000lb empty box mobile home it's gonna be worse than towing an 8000lb flat bed of decorative boulders.

AgingWheels on youtube did a video testing exactly this.

Re: Ford F-150 Lightning outsold the Cybertruck and was then canceled for poor sales

#363
post #254

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> pickup truck should just be max utility Except the main demographic buying F150s is suburban dads driving to their office job.

Gas doesn't cost enough.

I think the problem is Trucks are a visible lifestyle preferences that does not align with yours.

Re: Ford F-150 Lightning outsold the Cybertruck and was then canceled for poor sales

#364

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don’t get plug in hybrids. All other engine types save you more money compared to the next less efficient alternative the more you use them, but plugins get closer to the less efficient alternative (regular hybrid) the more you use them. Add in the approximately 25% price hike over the hybrid version when there is one and it makes no sense to me.

Depends on the car and driving patterns. I've got a friend with the PHEV Escape that he charges in his garage. It's the cheapest hybrid Escape that Ford sells, and he does all his driving on EV mode unless he has to do a longer trip outside of the city.

The Escape is interesting. I wonder how they manage to sell without a premium.

Re: Ford F-150 Lightning outsold the Cybertruck and was then canceled for poor sales

#365

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>I think the timing of the Cybertruck starting deliveries roughly aligning with when Elon got heavily involved in politics That and also it's just a bad product. >That said, even though it's not to my taste, I do admire that they dared to do something different and took a big gamble on it. A pickup truck should just be max utility, especially if you're a manufacturer making your first one edit: agree there's a market…

> A pickup truck should just be max utility, especially if you're a manufacturer making your first one The modern US pickup truck isn't built for utility. It's a $60,000 four-door lifted luxobarge with leather interior and a short bed. It signals (perceived) wealth while preserving working-class alignment. It can also be justified by way of having to pick up used furniture for TikTok refinish and flip projects or bim…

It is utility, just not the utility you're thinking of. Try spending all day, every day in a basic, rough riding pickup truck, then compare it to spending all day in a "luxobarge" that can still tow a 7,000lb trailer.

To the people I know who drive trucks like that, they're basically mobile offices.

Re: Ford F-150 Lightning outsold the Cybertruck and was then canceled for poor sales

#367

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don’t get plug in hybrids. All other engine types save you more money compared to the next less efficient alternative the more you use them, but plugins get closer to the less efficient alternative (regular hybrid) the more you use them. Add in the approximately 25% price hike over the hybrid version when there is one and it makes no sense to me.

I drive it to avoid burning gas, while not being dependent on electricity alone - not to save money. For three years my plug-in hybrid let me commute 50 miles daily on next to no gasoline.

I still don't think that perspective is rational. It saved at most 1 gallon of gas per day from being burned, and you still burn gas on longer trips.

I drive a plain ICE engine, but I plan for my next car to be a full EV for the reasons you state, plus the savings on gas for all miles driven (and I have driven 30k miles in the past year).

Re: Ford F-150 Lightning outsold the Cybertruck and was then canceled for poor sales

#368

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm very much on the left, and I honestly like the design of the Cybertruck. (I know this puts me in a minority.) It is disappointing that the original "unibody" design was abandoned. The new design where the body panels just randomly fall off is silly. If it was made by some other company I would genuinely consider buying one. But I would never buy another Tesla. I owned an older Model X, before Elon went full-fasci…

> I'm very much on the left, and I honestly like the design of the Cybertruck. (I know this puts me in a minority.) It is disappointing that the original "unibody" design was abandoned. The new design where the body panels just randomly fall off is silly. Function should drive form. The design would be cool if it was for a cool function. Say you have a beautifully-made, expertly-weighted tack hammer. That looks cool…

It is designed for cool functions, although a pure exoskeleton turned out to be infeasible the thick panels still help with side crashes, helping it get the Top Safety Pick+ award (equal/better than the competition other than "safety belt reminders). The steel makes it great for driving in places with branches and grocery cart/door dings. The panels also don't just "randomly" fall off, there was a period of time where the manufacturing process didn't follow the spec on applying the adhesive so ice crystals would form and degrade the adhesion.

Re: Ford F-150 Lightning outsold the Cybertruck and was then canceled for poor sales

#369
post #45

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> The depreciation of electric vehicles has made me appreciate those circumstances more and more. The depreciation for most EVs isn't all that different from that of new ICE vehicles. For a while, MSRPs were artificially inflated by the EV tax credit, which could give artificially worse depreciation appearance .

So now that the tax credits are gone we should expect to see the sticker prices on new EVs to drop right? Right? Any day now?

Tax incidence is pretty much a solved concept.

Re: Ford F-150 Lightning outsold the Cybertruck and was then canceled for poor sales

#370
post #253

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I bought a used Audi etron a couple months ago. Agent was going to try to sell me a service plan and realized none of them apply to electric :) The downstream fanout of the auto industry is huge…

There's still brakes, suspensions, tires, etc. to sell to EV buyers. Especially when EVs are so heavy that they have more wear on many of these.

but nothing compared to the oil changes, filter changes, as well as an ICE having multiple moving parts, so more chances for something to break.
Post reply on HN