361–366 of 366 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Is experience in electronics enough to work in that?
Yes and no. It's hard to enter chip design directly. But eventually all chips are used in a PCB and there's a lot going on on that interface. It's called application engineering or systems engineering in the field and that is also hot.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yes and no. It's hard to enter chip design directly. But eventually all chips are used in a PCB and there's a lot going on on that interface. It's called application engineering or systems engineering in the field and that is also hot.
So you’re talking about chip design primarily.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Supposed to, but doesn't. The U6 rate includes two new things: part-time workers, and a very strangely-defined category: people who are NOT working at ALL, AND were looking for work previously, AND have stopped looking for 4+ weeks. It doesn't capture the common on-the-street definition of the word "underemployment", such as a tech worker flipping burgers at mcdonald's. Perhaps that category is simply to hard or expe…
Seems like its studied and there are many types of underemployment and they each have difference causes. Its probably tracked somewhere by economists. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Underemployment
Earlier quoted context omitted.
How about no aggression at all.
If you would like to live passively in all aspects of your life, far be it from me to stop you. I, personally, care about things and are willing to passionately defend them, which is synonymous with aggression
Nah man, I'm clearly just talking about hacker news comments.
Being kind to people on here (and the internet in general) is a sign of good faith, and you are more likely to get your message across.
In this instance, maybe just assuming the person doesn't know about this other data, and educating them on that fact.
Being passive aggressive, or actively aggressive, on an internet forum is usually pointless. It indicates you're an asshole more than it serves as an indictment of whoever you are replying to, 100% of the time.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm not sure household debt is a great indicator. Someone that has a mortgage will have much more household debt than a renter, but also not have to pay rent. This would need data to contextualize.
Don't matter. You still have the debt. If you lose your job in a depression, odds are no much other people will be in the market to buy your home.
Or for some loan you need to pay monthly 5% of your income (for iphone or car), and other loan need you to pay 50% of your income (mortgages). You cannot count them in the same way...
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm not sure household debt is a great indicator. Someone that has a mortgage will have much more household debt than a renter, but also not have to pay rent. This would need data to contextualize.
Don't matter. You still have the debt. If you lose your job in a depression, odds are no much other people will be in the market to buy your home.
Or for some loan you need to pay monthly 5% of your income (for iphone or car), and other loan need you to pay 50% of your income (mortgages). You cannot count them in the same way. And mortgage can have 1% interest rate or 6%...