Live data from Hacker News

Removing SMS support from Signal Android (soon)

signal.org

361–370 of 649 posts

Re: Removing SMS support from Signal Android (soon)

#361

The comments here are so bizarre to me. I think this must be a USA thing. I had no idea signal even supported SMS, nor do I know anybody who uses SMS

Same here. I also considered this being a US-only thing. I couldn't care less about SMS.

In fact, I hope getting rid of SMS support adds some capacity to the team for features/fixes I care the most about.

Re: Removing SMS support from Signal Android (soon)

#362

I've been using Signal for a long time. I have repeatedly been unable to convince iOS users to use Signal because "I don't want another app". Android users have been much more willing to give it a shot. As an android user myself, I much prefer having SMS built in because I use the search feature often to look back through all my SMS/Signal chats. I also regularly forward an SMS message to a Signal user, or vice versa…

This. I've switched to iOS recently and I hate that I need two apps now. Already longing to go back to Android.

Just use iMessage. It's not as secure as Signal since the server has the keys, but it's the easiest way to ensure that the majority of text messages you send are encrypted.

There was just an article that said that 88% of teens have an iPhone. That means that almost all of their communication is encrypted.

Re: Removing SMS support from Signal Android (soon)

#363

Outside I think mostly the US, SMS is basically only used for spam and 2fa messages. I can't remember the last time I communicated with someone via SMS to be honest. To hear that people use it in group chats is mind boggling to me.

I'm with you. Totally confused about the outcry and use cases. Sounds like the 90s over here.

Same here. I'm pretty sure by now this is a local thing.

Re: Removing SMS support from Signal Android (soon)

#364

I've been using Signal for a long time. I have repeatedly been unable to convince iOS users to use Signal because "I don't want another app". Android users have been much more willing to give it a shot. As an android user myself, I much prefer having SMS built in because I use the search feature often to look back through all my SMS/Signal chats. I also regularly forward an SMS message to a Signal user, or vice versa…

> I have repeatedly been unable to convince iOS users to use Signal

We don't seem to have this problem so bad in the UK/Europe. Most people I know have WhatsApp and/or Telegram, and FB messenger, and Signal (in my friend circles); all alongside SMS. I have very few iMessage groups, and use it mostly for 1to1 SMS with people I don't know well.

Re: Removing SMS support from Signal Android (soon)

#365

Earlier quoted context omitted.

...and there I am here in Germany where nobody seems to use SMS anymore. I couldn't care less about this.

> in Germany where nobody seems to use SMS anymore. That's not true at all. I assume that besides Signal you use WhatsApp, though?

I haven't met a single person using SMS for so long that I can't even remember the phone I had last time I used it. I do work with a lot different contractors.

And yes, WhatsApp is prevalent here.

Re: Removing SMS support from Signal Android (soon)

#366

... and there's the reason I will likely stop using Signal? Signal was always one of those "win-win" apps, get more security when it's available and I don't have to worry about adding to the giant bucket of messaging apps. They were a paragon of putting the user first and I was a strong supporter... but now... Why not Telegram? Or anything else? I don't need the security, it was nice-to-have. Having to switch between…

Correction, you dont need the privacy* Telegram is absolutely the worst when it comes to privacy, it has access to everything you do and say. If you want a master app, have a lot at matrix.org with bridges.

Bridges break end to end encryption.

Re: Removing SMS support from Signal Android (soon)

#367
post #328

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I agree completely here. This is terrible news from my perspective too. I use Signal for _all messaging_ (e2e secure or not) for the reasons that you mention. I've onboarded friends and family, too, ensuring them it should be set as their default messaging app and that it _just works_. Unfortunately, people in the general population seem to have pretty much zero tolerance for any friction whatsoever. If they have to…

I don't like some of the decisions taken by Signal. However, if "dropping support for SMS messaging also frees up our capacity to build new features (yes, like usernames)", I think it is something I would not miss. Besides, I agree with them on the point that SMS leak metadata.

But that's just a bullshit promise (in the sense of not being anchored to any commitment), no different from a politician saying some policy initiative will create jobs because that's how the economy works.

SMS does leak metadata but guess what, that leakage is going to continue because people aren't going to just cut off their SMS-only-using friends and relatives. Now they'll be leaking Metadata from an even less secure app, so the user is in no way better off.

Re: Removing SMS support from Signal Android (soon)

#368
post #309

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Austrians don't care too. I can't understand who and why anyone cares about SMS these day, besides receiving government emergency notifications.

Phone-based 2FA hasn't got to Austria yet?

Phone-based 2FA isn't really the problem here no?

I don't even open the SMS program if I get a code. I type it from the notification area. I certainly don't have to answer to it.

Re: Removing SMS support from Signal Android (soon)

#369
This is a frustrating change being proposed and I don't like how powerless I feel to stop it. I even started donating to Signal because I support what they have done but it will dramatically limit the usability of the app. Many people sign up for Signal and then never check it and so it was convenient to be able to send a insecure SMS message to them instead.

The only possible benefit to this would be to break their dependence on using phone numbers as the way to sign up for accounts and possibly provide a reasonable way to export message data.

Otherwise it just feels like the wrong decision and a reminder that Signal is not a community driven project but subject to arbitrary changes and provides no way to fork or disagree with the project lead as can be done with most free and open source software.

Post reply on HN