Earlier quoted context omitted.
It has got to be one of the most insane takes I've read on HN, which to be fair has been trending towards "unhinged" when it comes to Anthropic and AI safety. Compute multipliers are like a quant firm's trading algorithms. They're the crown jewels, the whole alpha of the lab. If you leak them, the lab dies. Protecting them does not make Dario a villain, it's literally his job. It's also Sam's job, Denis's job, Mira's…
So how can Deepseek publish them without killing themselves?
GPT-5.6 Sol Ultra will be in Codex
351–360 of 433 posts
Re: GPT-5.6 Sol Ultra will be in Codex
#352Earlier quoted context omitted.
https://archive.ph/NEwVz "However, these inference optimizations, which rival Anthropic refers to as “compute multipliers,” are a big focus for all the labs. Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei has been publicly talking about the concept since at least mid-2023, when he said on a podcast that the company limits “the number of people who are aware of a given compute multiplier” because it could give other AI labs a leg up if t…
Keep in mind, these tech leaders have deluded themselves with the infinite jest of "effective altrusim" which can effective ignore any problem today for some imagined future problem that they're solving. So if they have to enslave the human race because there's a super killer asteroid 10 million lightyears away heading towards us, they'll do it, because obviously, saving future humanity is the only thing that makes s…
The primary effective altruism cause areas are extremely acute and high-scale problems like malaria, vaccine distribution, and factory farming
Re: GPT-5.6 Sol Ultra will be in Codex
#353Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm using local models in Ollama for most things and only use the paid corporate account when my local model gets stuck.
for code as well? which local model are u using for coding
Re: GPT-5.6 Sol Ultra will be in Codex
#354Earlier quoted context omitted.
I’m in Finance and learned pretty quickly that to point out the implicit future cost raises based on the cost the LLM-providers need to recoup was unpopular at best (STFU better describes the situation). Running full force into a bear trap.
This is wrong. Token costs for the same model rapidly collapse over a year. Hardware inflation is a thing but not bad enough to outweigh the massive impact of software optimizations. Tokens billed at API prices are profitable for openAI and anthropic today and it only get more lucrative every month for them as their inference costs fall. If it weren’t for continuous massive training runs taking larger and larger cape…
That's nice for them. What's less nice for them is that big customers are figuring out (some faster, some more slowly) that they don't want to pay API prices, or at least only for a much smaller number of tokens.
Re: GPT-5.6 Sol Ultra will be in Codex
#355Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's the Tragedy of the Commons. There will always be a vacuum of predatory bullshit that can be filled, and the victor is always the biggest sociopath. Rockefeller, Cecil Rhodes, Elon Musk, it's the same traceable pattern all the way back through history. It's not that everyone is like this, but that a few crafty marketeers are able to ruin it for everyone. Why should I treat Sam and Dario with special white gloves?…
The only reason Chinese labs release their research is because they are behind. They lose nothing by doing so because the alpha has already been discovered. This is not hard to understand. Do you really think DeepSeek would publish their algorithms if they led the American companies? Lmao.
Even when they're reaching parity with American models, Z.ai, Qwen and Deepseek are upholding their end of the bargain. I'd criticize them too, if they were due any scrutiny.
Re: GPT-5.6 Sol Ultra will be in Codex
#356Earlier quoted context omitted.
> He sure did seem to speed run the 'tech leader with scruples' to 'tech villain' path! What kind of rosy-eyed chump believes in the "tech leader with scruples" bullshit? It always lies. Did some people just ignore Mark Zuckerberg and Tim Cook's sociopathy, somehow? Did anyone buy into their "privacy is a human right" nonsense?
Zuckerberg never had scruples, and everyone knew that from the start.
Re: GPT-5.6 Sol Ultra will be in Codex
#357Earlier quoted context omitted.
If you follow AI news you'd know what these are easily, or even just look at the top posts in the last month on HN to see. https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=pastMonth&page=2&prefix=fa...
This wouldn't be necessary with descriptive product names
Re: GPT-5.6 Sol Ultra will be in Codex
#358Earlier quoted context omitted.
The US can just ban Chinese weights being used in US companies.
There's no need for a ban. There's already no use at all of Chinese models in the US simply because they're Chinese.
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2026-05-20/airbnb-s-...
Re: GPT-5.6 Sol Ultra will be in Codex
#359Re: GPT-5.6 Sol Ultra will be in Codex
#360No context, nothing, just a title and a random link to a tweet, which has a seemingly relevant response from someone who works at OpenAI I guess.