[deleted]
Project Glasswing: Securing critical software for the AI era
351–360 of 921 posts
Re: Project Glasswing: Securing critical software for the AI era
#352The system card for Claude Mythos (PDF): https://www-cdn.anthropic.com/53566bf5440a10affd749724787c89... Interesting to see that they will not be releasing Mythos generally. [edit: Mythos Preview generally - fair to say they may release a similar model but not this exact one] I'm still reading the system card but here's a little highlight: > Early indications in the training of Claude Mythos Preview suggested that th…
This opens up an interesting new avenue for corporate FOMO. What if you don't partner with Anthropic, miss out on access to their shiny new cybersec model, and then fall prey to a vuln that the model would have caught?
Re: Project Glasswing: Securing critical software for the AI era
#353Must be nice to be in a position to sell both disease and cure.
That's exactly not what they're doing. They aren't creating operating system vulnerabilities. They're telling you about ones that already existed.
Mythos aside, frontier LLMs can already be used to find exploits at faster pace than humans alone. Whether that knowledge gets used to patch them or exploit them is dependent on the user. Cybersecurity has always been an arms race and LLMs are rapidly becoming powerful arms. Whether they like it or not LLM providers are now important dealers in that arms race. I appreciate Anthropic trying to give “good guys” a leg up (if that is indeed their real main motivation which I do find credible but not certain). But it’s still a scary world we’re entering and I doubt the fierce competition will leave all labs acting benevolently.
Re: Project Glasswing: Securing critical software for the AI era
#354Earlier quoted context omitted.
~1/3rd of US citizens voted for him. Don’t lump us all in.
Some of you are just guilty of negligence yes.
Or maybe it's that our archaic system was designed so that some people's votes literally matter more than others, and more than half the country does not have a meaningful voice in our Federal elections.
Re: Project Glasswing: Securing critical software for the AI era
#355Earlier quoted context omitted.
You should watch this talk by Nicholas Carlini (security researcher at Anthropic). Everything in the talk was done with Opus 4.6: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1sd26pWhfmg
its also very easy to reproduce. i have more findings than i know what to do with
are there any tricks you'd suggest, or starter prompts, for using claude to analyze my own company's services for security problems?
Re: Project Glasswing: Securing critical software for the AI era
#356Earlier quoted context omitted.
Some of you are just guilty of negligence yes.
Or maybe it's that our archaic system was designed so that some people's votes literally matter more than others, and more than half the country does not have a meaningful voice in our Federal elections.
This is negligence with extra steps.
> more than half the country does not have a meaningful voice in our Federal elections
There is almost certainly an election on your ballot every time that is meaningful. Relinquishing that civic duty is how we get Trump. People to lazy, stupid or proud to vote absolutely bear responsibility for this mess.
Re: Project Glasswing: Securing critical software for the AI era
#357Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Large American AI company does not list the US as an adversarial actor This is not a surprise or a gotcha.
Said company is literally in court against said government at the moment, after said government attempted to designate it too dangerous to do business with.
There are currently over 1,000 companies involved in lawsuits against the US government right now even if we restrict ourselves to just tariff lawsuits.
Re: Project Glasswing: Securing critical software for the AI era
#358Earlier quoted context omitted.
From the article: > Anthropic’s commitment of $100M in model usage credits to Project Glasswing and additional participants will cover substantial usage throughout this research preview. Afterward, Claude Mythos Preview will be available to participants at $25/$125 per million input/output tokens (participants can access the model on the Claude API, Amazon Bedrock, Google Cloud’s Vertex AI, and Microsoft Foundry).
Key point: available to participants .
give it a couple months
Re: Project Glasswing: Securing critical software for the AI era
#359Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yep, I think the lede might be buried here and we're probably cooked (assuming you mean SWEs, but the writing has been on the wall for 4 months.) I guess I'm still excited. What's my new profession going to be? Longer term, are we going to solve diseases and aging? Or are the ranks going to thin from 10B to 10000 trillionaires and world-scale con-artist misanthropes plus their concubines?
Your new profession will be attempting to find enough gig work to eat. You will also be competing with self-driving taxis, so there's that as well.
I need to start SaaS for getting people to start doing lunges and squats so they can carry others around on their back, I need a founding engineer, a founding marketer, and 100m hard currency.
Re: Project Glasswing: Securing critical software for the AI era
#360Ironically Claude cli completely failed to detect a rogue code on my html scan yesterday while ChatGPT web version detected it immediately. Can’t wait to do same test with newer version.