Live data from Hacker News

An $814M Mystery Near the Heart of the Biggest Bitcoin Exchange

bloomberg.com

351–359 of 359 posts

Re: An $814M Mystery Near the Heart of the Biggest Bitcoin Exchange

#351

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Bear in mind that this is bitcoin. People continued pumping money into mtgox for _months_ after it was clear to anyone who’d been paying attention that it was dead. And currently bitcoin’s in an unusually large bubble, so there are lots of people buying into it who’ve never previously had experience of it. I see ads for, basically, “get rich quick with bitcoin” every day now. The people clicking those are not the wor…

> Bear in mind that this is bitcoin It's still a market, so market logic should apply. > get rich quick with bitcoin I see the same shit with real estate. > sufficient people buying tethers at face value It's a market. Smart money can sell tethers. When there's information that all market participants know, the market price should reflect that information.

The market can stay irrational a lot longer than you or I can stay solvent.

Re: An $814M Mystery Near the Heart of the Biggest Bitcoin Exchange

#352
post #149

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That author is plain wrong and shows deep ignorance about bitcoin and the crypto-market. An unsustainable price of bitcoin will lead to the collapse of other exchanges since people cashing out on these exchanges requires enormous amount of real money. This will create a situation where the price of bitcoin in Bitfinex is higher than other exchanges by a big gap. This is not the case, actually the opposite is true: Bi…

Sound analysis! Quick question: what do you think is going to happen to BCH when coinbase unlocks users' tokens?

Most coinbase users withdrew their coins. I'm guessing they have way less than 100k BCH. Xapo recent dump of 25k in a couple days barely moved the price downed considering its volatility. I'm guessing we triple/quadruple from here by early next year. Don't take this as investment advice. I'm not responsible for your losses or your life.

Re: An $814M Mystery Near the Heart of the Biggest Bitcoin Exchange

#353
post #188

Earlier quoted context omitted.

the market is extremely illiquid. even if you know it's a scam you have few options if you want to cash out. you can trade bitcoin for cash balances at various exchanges but actually withdrawing those balances is subject to miniscule daily/monthly withdrawal limits and if there's a run on the market those exchanges will almost certainly collapse. there's no significant over the counter market. you can swap your bitco…

> you can trade bitcoin for cash balances at various exchanges but actually withdrawing those balances is subject to miniscule daily/monthly withdrawal limits and if there's a run on the market those exchanges will almost certainly collapse. Afaik Bitstamp doesn't have any withdrawal limits for verified users.

For an exchange there needs to be a counterparty. While Bitstamp is known as 'an exchange', they are not the counterparty AFAIK.

If Satoshi rocks up with 1 meeeelion BTC, if faith evaporates, the bid price could well be zero.

Re: An $814M Mystery Near the Heart of the Biggest Bitcoin Exchange

#354
post #203

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm no expert but mulling it over.... If Tether is big enough that the price of BTC is effected by it, such that investors feel they can cash out and that is part of their risk calculation, then a tank in Tether would also cause a drop in BTC. If Tether is backed by loans and not hard cold cash that's a risk and effects the value. If someone is able to buy Tether on credit, and the credit is actually backed by BTC th…

>If someone is able to buy Tether on credit, and the credit is actually backed by BTC then there could be a loop. Indeed, one of the BFX employees accidentally let it out that Tethers are not backed by USD but perceived value of cryptos held by the exchange. https://mobile.twitter.com/bitfinexed/status/935333097377329... Anybody claiming that a loop does not exist has to be in some kind of denial.

But is $845m enough to pump the entire crypto market by billions in market cap? Maybe there are secondary effects here, like increasing peoples confidence in crypto because of a false sense of liquidity, or something like that.

Re: An $814M Mystery Near the Heart of the Biggest Bitcoin Exchange

#355

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>If someone is able to buy Tether on credit, and the credit is actually backed by BTC then there could be a loop. Indeed, one of the BFX employees accidentally let it out that Tethers are not backed by USD but perceived value of cryptos held by the exchange. https://mobile.twitter.com/bitfinexed/status/935333097377329... Anybody claiming that a loop does not exist has to be in some kind of denial.

But is $845m enough to pump the entire crypto market by billions in market cap? Maybe there are secondary effects here, like increasing peoples confidence in crypto because of a false sense of liquidity, or something like that.

Market cap defined as price * total supply is a fallacy because it does not account for liquidity. Order books are fairly [0] thin even at the larger exchanges that you only need to buy/sell a few thousand BTCs to have a significant impact on price. If you consider the potential of wash trades it gets even easier. Bear in mind that up to 1/3 of all bitcoins mined could have been lost[1] and only a small amount of actively traded anyway.

A good parallel would be that Tesla is valued by the market at 500+ billion, but it's impossible for all shareholders to sell their shares for 500 billion because there are no buyers with 500 billion in cash waiting to buy Tesla stocks, and if anyone tried the price will crash after the first few percent has been dumped.

[0]:https://www.bitfinex.com/order_book [1]:http://fortune.com/2017/11/25/lost-bitcoins/

Re: An $814M Mystery Near the Heart of the Biggest Bitcoin Exchange

#356
post #123

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There's no reason arbitrage should push up the price of Bitcoin. Tether exists to normalize arb opportunities between exchanges. That's what it was created for. There is indeed a real question as to whether or not Bitfinex has issued more Tether than it has in reserve, or whether or not they will actually pay people out for their Tether tokens. But there is no 'arbitrage feedback loop' driving the price rise.

It only works that way if you trust Tether and the exchanges. Given how shadowy the big ones are, I'm not sure that's a good idea. It appears this kind of arbitrage is designed to push up the price of BTC -- as long as the price keeps going up, people aren't going to withdraw. Once we start to see a sell-off though, the exchanges will stop being able to pay in USD pretty quickly. My thought is that every time Tether/…

Yes, but there is no evidence that that is happening. Bitcoin has a $200B market cap. There is only approximately 800 million usd worth of Tether on the market. It's easy to make up stories about what might be happening, but just because it's possible something is happening doesn't mean that it is.

Re: An $814M Mystery Near the Heart of the Biggest Bitcoin Exchange

#357

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Isn't ltcm an example of markets keeping a dumb, dumb, dumb trading model ungrounded in reality from going out of whack?

It was an example of what happened when everyone believes the so called "smartest people in the room" without questioning. It also represents what happens when the market adjusts to what you're doing but you fail to adjust and also the nature of tail risk. Was their model dumb? Tough to say, they did win a nobel prize in economics for it. I think warren buffet has some quote about how they were "risking a million to…

Well given that their model was predicated on price movements being normally distributed and for around 100 years price movements have been known to be levy alpha distributed (alpha ~1.6 for the most volatile and usually ~1.8), I'd say it was dumb.

Re: An $814M Mystery Near the Heart of the Biggest Bitcoin Exchange

#358
post #356

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It only works that way if you trust Tether and the exchanges. Given how shadowy the big ones are, I'm not sure that's a good idea. It appears this kind of arbitrage is designed to push up the price of BTC -- as long as the price keeps going up, people aren't going to withdraw. Once we start to see a sell-off though, the exchanges will stop being able to pay in USD pretty quickly. My thought is that every time Tether/…

Yes, but there is no evidence that that is happening. Bitcoin has a $200B market cap. There is only approximately 800 million usd worth of Tether on the market. It's easy to make up stories about what might be happening, but just because it's possible something is happening doesn't mean that it is.

You are underestimating the extent to which a finite $200M injection can make it seem like the price is skyrocketing for exogenous factors and therefore yield real money coming in. Classic pump and dump strategy.

Re: An $814M Mystery Near the Heart of the Biggest Bitcoin Exchange

#359

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Unfortunately fractional reserve isn't safe for a currency that is this volatile. Depending on what the "fraction" is, some major withdrawal demand against one of these exchanges would topple it

So you are a Big Fish. You have a boatload of money in exchange X. You go to take it out and they don't immediately give it to you. They say, "Listen, we can't get to it, it's in our cold wallets, it will take a week." A week goes by, they say, "Listen, here's 10% of what you asked for, we'll get you the rest shortly.". This goes on, they periodically give you some of the money but there's a lot of evasion. What's th…

A is obviously the choice here... but that's a problem if you have a lot of big fish trying to get their money but can't. The price should be tanking, but everyone is too afraid to trigger a run on the exchanges that would kill their investment. There's really no way to know if this is happening. It could have already started.
Post reply on HN