This sounds like a great thing for people that beat their domestic partners. Make it harder for their victims to escape.
FCC wants to kill burner phones by forcing telecoms to get all customers' IDs
341–350 of 417 posts
Re: FCC wants to kill burner phones by forcing telecoms to get all customers' IDs
#342Earlier quoted context omitted.
Flock is being rejected in a number of cities, thanks to citizens.
How data-driven policing is sold, spoke to someone who set it up once, good odds FLock is doing it, or in the spirit of the below, Flock doesn't have to do it: - There are networked webcams everywhere: DoT cameras, 18 wheeler fleet cameras, traffic cams, etc. - Local PD doesn't want to make a deal with Flock - For average jane and joe citizenry: great, no Flock in town! - For ongoing negotiations with Flock and the P…
Except, they totally want to make a deal with Flock. If not Flock, another similar vendor.
Re: FCC wants to kill burner phones by forcing telecoms to get all customers' IDs
#343If phones could reliably tag an incoming call as "ID provided" or not, then people who cared could screen calls appropriately, and people who wanted to protect their identity could still have a phone.
Re: FCC wants to kill burner phones by forcing telecoms to get all customers' IDs
#344Earlier quoted context omitted.
It seems to depend a lot. It's kind of hard in Germany - they wanted my permanent address. I didn't find France as difficult. Iceland didn't care. Italy wanted my passport. Chile, you virtually needed to be a citizen, as I recall.
Btw you can still buy an anonymous SIM card with cash in the Netherlands in pretty much any supermarket/kiosk/whatever. And if you just need Internet, I haven't had any eSIM provider try to verify my ID so far. Although those can't easily be paid in cash.
Re: FCC wants to kill burner phones by forcing telecoms to get all customers' IDs
#345Earlier quoted context omitted.
It can if it's a roaming eSIM. I'm sure all the countries mentioned here e.g. Australia still handles US SIMs roaming there fine even when the US SIM dossn't have ID tied to it.
A roaming eSIM would work the same way as a roaming SIM. Just because it's easier to set up (no need to get a physical SIM) doesn't change the regulations around it.
I believe some travel eSIMs are actually issued from outside the country you're going to.
Re: FCC wants to kill burner phones by forcing telecoms to get all customers' IDs
#346They have to have your residential address for "emergency reasons" which is fairly defensible at least
Re: FCC wants to kill burner phones by forcing telecoms to get all customers' IDs
#347Earlier quoted context omitted.
The free anonymous internet was only ever a ruse to get people to use it so the CIA could spy on them. DARPA, folks, created a “free as in beer” global surveillance network and we all bought it. Not that we didn’t get anything in return but the idea that the worlds foremost military industrial complex just gave this to the world because they loved us is laughable.
Huh? DARPA created something to help retain communication and coordination capabilities for our government in event of nuclear attack.
Re: FCC wants to kill burner phones by forcing telecoms to get all customers' IDs
#348Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Chile, you virtually needed to be a citizen, as I recall. I heard something similar about Russia after recent changes actually, it could as well be impossible for non-residents so tourists just stick with international roaming and public wifi. IIRC there's a catch-22 situation where you need a Gosuslugi (online government services portal) account to buy a sim, but you need a Russian phone number to sign up for one.…
But of course, the public Wifi also requires authentication. With, you guessed it, a phone number.
Though I've seen, plenty of times, smaller places have a "public" wifi with a password, and the password is just written on a piece of paper somewhere. That must technically violate that law. But you know, laws in Russia...
Re: FCC wants to kill burner phones by forcing telecoms to get all customers' IDs
#349Earlier quoted context omitted.
But... what does your comment have to do with burner phones? A burner phone is a phone number whose owner is not officially registered somewhere as the owner. A spoofed phone number is a false declaration that you're calling from number XXXXXXXXXX when in fact you're calling from YYYYYYYYYY. You might notice that there is absolutely no relationship between these two ideas. You can be registered and lie about your pho…
There are phone farms that exclusively use burner phones and do not need to spoof caller ID.
>>> I think in general the ability to spoof numbers should be banned / controlled. Someone from India should not be allowed to call me with a caller ID from Mayo Clinic.
>> This has absolutely nothing to do with burner phones and the proposed changes won't do anything to change that.
> That is not correct. There a phone farms operating purely on burner phones
This is total nonsense. A phone farm that doesn't spoof caller ID isn't presenting false caller ID.