Live data from Hacker News

Google denies training Bard on ChatGPT chats from ShareGPT

twitter.com

341–342 of 342 posts

Re: Google denies training Bard on ChatGPT chats from ShareGPT

#341

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Isn't it generally very hard to be first to market? And even if you are it's more likely that someone coming in later will take your lunch. Apple wasn't the first one to try to make a successful smartphone, but they had resources, know-how, and tried at a better time with fewer unknowns around.

Or were just willing to adapt when others didn’t. Blackberry mocked the touchscreen for years until finally coming around and their initial implementation was awful.

Blackberry Torch??

Re: Google denies training Bard on ChatGPT chats from ShareGPT

#342

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I can see the GitHub Copilot controversy being resolved in this way. If Microsoft, GitHub, and OpenAI successfully use the fair use defense for Copilot's appropriation of proprietary and incompatibly licensed code, then a free and open source alternative to Copilot can be trained on Copilot's outputs. After all, the GitHub Copilot Product Specific Terms say: > 2. Ownership of Suggestions and Your Code > GitHub does n…

Why would it need to be trained on Copilot’s output? Its training data is publicly available code on GitHub, so just use that directly. ChatGPT is different because they specifically trained it as an assistant with a private dataset

That was in reference to GP's point that

> stealing from other AI turns out to often be easier

If that holds true for Copilot, then it would make sense for a free and open source alternative to train on Copilot's outputs.

Post reply on HN