Earlier quoted context omitted.
Look, I like open source federated ecosystems like Mastodon, but claiming Twitter or Facebook will be shut down any time soon is laughable. I'm not sure I could reliably predict whether Twitter or Mastodon will live longer.
Once the twitter sale is completed, the new owner of twitter can chose whatever they want to do with it, including shutting it down - which in this milleu would be something that the buyer of twitter will consider doing just for LOL's. imagine the trolling potential of a rolling outage of twitter or ooops "new owner" deleted the database as a joke. Or replace all twitter profiles with sayings from Doge. before you sa…
Mastodon.technology Shutdown
341–350 of 604 posts
Re: Mastodon.technology Shutdown
#342Earlier quoted context omitted.
That's mistaking the map for the terrain. It's a networked system for leaving and retrieving messages. It's not a group of friends. The way you expect to migrate a messaging system is by moving the messages.
To confirm, I wish they would migrate posts, too, but I do not believe that the lack of that means that you cannot call it a migration. However, your definition seems overly pedantic? It defines itself[0] as a social network with an emphasis on audience. Messaging is merely the method of interaction. [Edit] "audience" is incorrect, I should've said "people" 0: https://joinmastodon.org/
Re: Mastodon.technology Shutdown
#343Earlier quoted context omitted.
If you’re going to stretch definitions like that “anytime soon” can go as far. It was a reasonable paraphrase
If by "stretch" you mean "consider the context", then no, it's an unreasoned paraphrase.
That may not have been what the original poster intended but if that’s the case then they should use less ambiguous language.
Re: Mastodon.technology Shutdown
#344Earlier quoted context omitted.
To confirm, I wish they would migrate posts, too, but I do not believe that the lack of that means that you cannot call it a migration. However, your definition seems overly pedantic? It defines itself[0] as a social network with an emphasis on audience. Messaging is merely the method of interaction. [Edit] "audience" is incorrect, I should've said "people" 0: https://joinmastodon.org/
A "social network" is a networked system for leaving and retrieving messages. Again, it is not a group of friends. It is a messaging system for a group of friends, just like a map is a graphical system for navigating a piece of terrain.
Re: Mastodon.technology Shutdown
#345Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Let's talk once twitter shuts down. Because it will. Bingo. I say this all the time, Twitter is not immune from being a member of this list (Defunct social networking sites, wikipedia): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_defunct_social_network... The Fediverse (or Federated Social Web as it was previously referred to in 2007[0] or so when it was first envisioned) will never close. Single installations may, but t…
Wouldn't the answer for most people to "What happens when Twitter shuts down?" be, "Well I'll just move to the next social media site". I don't necessarily hold that opinion, but I get the impression most folks I know do.
This happens all the time and there are parallels with other format / medium shifts (Gutenberg invents movable type, newspapers supplanted by news reels at the cinema -> people buy radio receivers -> broadcast television -> cable news -> whatever we have today with our always-on internet connections and services.
My main point here is that audiences are fluid, we can respect their intelligence, and they go where the content is.
Re: Mastodon.technology Shutdown
#346Earlier quoted context omitted.
Let’s use Google+ as an example. It did shut down and still not all wounds have healed yet. For example, the indie RPG scene laments its demise. Edit: A Reddit thread as citation https://www.reddit.com/r/rpg/comments/udegsl/does_anyone_hav...
TIL about .compact on reddit threads. Thanks!
Re: Mastodon.technology Shutdown
#347Earlier quoted context omitted.
To confirm, I wish they would migrate posts, too, but I do not believe that the lack of that means that you cannot call it a migration. However, your definition seems overly pedantic? It defines itself[0] as a social network with an emphasis on audience. Messaging is merely the method of interaction. [Edit] "audience" is incorrect, I should've said "people" 0: https://joinmastodon.org/
A "social network" is a networked system for leaving and retrieving messages. Again, it is not a group of friends. It is a messaging system for a group of friends, just like a map is a graphical system for navigating a piece of terrain.
But I'm not entirely sure why you're arguing semantics with me. It can, by their definition, be considered migration.
Re: Mastodon.technology Shutdown
#348Re: Mastodon.technology Shutdown
#349Re: Mastodon.technology Shutdown
#350Earlier quoted context omitted.
Google isn't really a good example, they love killing off services on a whim. Meta closing down Facebook would be much more... dramatic, shall we say.
Google+ is a great example of the point that once a community's platform gets shut down, it's often tough to find another place to meet, and some people don't survive the transition.