Earlier quoted context omitted.
So it's like Glassdoor or Salary.com? That's not a union, that's not HR, that's not armed protection.
Are unions armed protection? Anyway, the idea is to have a coordinator that work on your benefit. Companies, even the large ones are simply people coordinated by the capital owners. The not-union is a coordinator for the people who are not the capital owners but those who deal with the capital owners. The aim is to assist for a fair deal through information, not to extort the capital owners.
Amazon reportedly has Pinkerton agents surveil workers who try to form unions
341–350 of 468 posts
Re: Amazon reportedly has Pinkerton agents surveil workers who try to form unions
#342In 1920 Appalachia, coal companies owned all the land, the homes and stores. They also paid workers with their own special money (that was useless everywhere else). The security companies they hired where armed and violent towards miners and their families. https://explorepartsunknown.com/west-virginia/coal-minings-d... Today, people can tour these old towns and learn the history of how the coal companies trapped and…
This is where the Tennessee Ernie Ford song comes from, "Sixteen tons and what do you get? Another day older and deeper in debt. St. Peter don't call me cause I can't go, I owe my soul to the company store." There was an episode of South Park last season where they played this song as a backdrop to Amazon workers in a warehouse.
0: The album was released in 1947 prior to the introduction of the 12" LP, so it was originally released as a literal album of multiple 78rpm singles. It is one of the first concept albums. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Folk_Songs_of_the_Hills
Re: Amazon reportedly has Pinkerton agents surveil workers who try to form unions
#343Earlier quoted context omitted.
They could do whatever they're doing with their tech workers. Around these parts any talk of unionizing developers is usually meet with skepticism or derision. So whatever big tech is doing is keeping most of their tech workers happy and unwilling to unionize. They could do the same for their warehouse employees, but that would mean paying them very well and giving good benefits.
It's not really feasible to pay their box packers $120k / year.
It's also not that feasible to pay developers $120k/yr as the rest of the world has found out, America manages it for a number of reasons and because of this you likely won't see developers unionise any time soon even if you guys do have some very questionable contracts.
Re: Amazon reportedly has Pinkerton agents surveil workers who try to form unions
#344Earlier quoted context omitted.
Oh, do you honestly think such an "secretive, radical union cell" funded by "dark money" would be allowed to exist and interface with corporates? (words in scare-quotes would be how this would be framed by employers and the media - they may or may not throw in foreign funding, Venezuela or China could get name-dropped with zero evidence).
It doesn’t have to be secret, just your membership is secret. It can have open plan offices in a cool neighborhood, pay politicians and all. Just have centralized Emlpoyers information management system where information about employers, like salaries they pay business they do, the good and the bad to work there etc. So when you are getting a job you apply to your not-union and they tell you what to expect and how mu…
Re: Amazon reportedly has Pinkerton agents surveil workers who try to form unions
#345Earlier quoted context omitted.
The ironic thing about the UK is we are seeing the same people advocating deregulation at the national level, while also campaigning for greater government intervention at the local level. Or at least that's been the general sentiment I've seen in many of the Tory strongholds in the counties surrounding London.
this is always the right-wing rhetorical contradiction: "less government!"... when it comes to limiting the power of capital, and redistributing its profits to society "more government!!" when it comes to squashing dissent to capital and existing hierarchies it's not really a contradiction, it's part of a consistent authoritarian ideology ruled by capital and other oppressive social structures, but it is outwardly hy…
Re: Amazon reportedly has Pinkerton agents surveil workers who try to form unions
#346Earlier quoted context omitted.
So it's like Glassdoor or Salary.com? That's not a union, that's not HR, that's not armed protection.
Are unions armed protection? Anyway, the idea is to have a coordinator that work on your benefit. Companies, even the large ones are simply people coordinated by the capital owners. The not-union is a coordinator for the people who are not the capital owners but those who deal with the capital owners. The aim is to assist for a fair deal through information, not to extort the capital owners.
Historically, yes, sometimes.
Re: Amazon reportedly has Pinkerton agents surveil workers who try to form unions
#347Earlier quoted context omitted.
> the people who are forced to work in Amazon's warehouses Who is being forced?
People that cannot find a better alternative in their current personal situation. Sure they are not "forced" in a precise linguistic sense. But when it's this or nothing there is really just an illusion of choice.
If Amazon went away, would their situation be better or worse?
I believe that as a society we must ensure that people have enough money to live, but why should the employers on the bottom of the skills spectrum be forced to bear the brunt of it?
Every employer should be required by law to provide a safe workplace free of discrimination and harassment. But hiring unskilled workers at a market wage doesn’t make you a bad actor.
Re: Amazon reportedly has Pinkerton agents surveil workers who try to form unions
#348Earlier quoted context omitted.
The issue is that being in a "not-union" isn't a protected class, so you could probably get fired for it after your employer sent the "not-Pinkertons" to do some intel. To prevent this, you'd have to get your "not-Union" to either have huge solidarity, or lobby the government to make that a protected class. Maybe if you went for the first you could make a song about it, how about "Solidarity not-for-finite-periods-of…
Why would they fire or investigate you? It’s not like you’re organizing strikes or anything like that. You are simply benefiting of the same knowledge that companies have to have a fairer deal.
Re: Amazon reportedly has Pinkerton agents surveil workers who try to form unions
#349Earlier quoted context omitted.
> the people who are forced to work in Amazon's warehouses Who is being forced?
If given a free choice of literally anything they could do to contribute to the world, do you think Amazon warehouse employees would put Amazon warehouse work as their primary choice? Something they said they wanted to do "when they grow up"? "Something with dehumanising conditions, please!" If not, what is your answer to the quesiton "why are they doing this job at all"? Because they have to do something, and this i…
Re: Amazon reportedly has Pinkerton agents surveil workers who try to form unions
#350Earlier quoted context omitted.
>work is just a business deal and wouldn't be possible for employees create some kind of company that deals with the companies they are employed? have you read Godfather?
Please explain?
Populist tough-guy shakes down businesses to get back at The Man or some such.
Plus unions in the US have often been infiltrated by organized crime.