Live data from Hacker News

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 Intelligence, Performance and Price Analysis

artificialanalysis.ai

331–340 of 343 posts

Re: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 Intelligence, Performance and Price Analysis

#331
post #138

Earlier quoted context omitted.

because once they run out of tokens they can’t do their jobs anymore

This is a sad state of affair. I'm faster with the LLM, but I sure as hell can do everything just like I could, as before the current state of things.

Its not because the whole thread is made up bs about imaginary friends.

Re: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 Intelligence, Performance and Price Analysis

#332

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Half of the engineers at OAI and Anthropic are Asian, I don't think China does all these for signaling.

I was not trying to make that kind of argument, but rather a geopolitical one. Retaining world-class talent and home-growing industries is no small feat. In Europe, we have been struggling with this, and I am not even entirely sure why.

A lot of world-class talent do not want to pay 50-60% taxes, so they move somewhere else. Not everyone, I'm just saying, it was a genuine consideration for me.

Re: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 Intelligence, Performance and Price Analysis

#334
post #265

Performance per dollar is in the ‘too good to be true’ territory, what’s the deal here?

This is China's way of applying its modus operandi of '80% the quality at 20% the price' to LLMs. Aim is dumping the tokens on the world market like they did with other industries like shipbuilding, steel etc.

Nitpicking, vut I use Claude at work and DeepSeek "at home".

DS has a lot more than mere 80% of Claude's capability, and the price is a lot less than 20%.

Re: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 Intelligence, Performance and Price Analysis

#335

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The training use is probably responsible for this improvement tho.

They could certainly still achieve that even if they had a slightly more expensive tier with a (pinky promise) "no training" bit set, or even if it were just an opt-in most users wouldn't bother with.

There's probably a correlation between how serious the work someone is doing is and how likely they are to want to disable training usage. An opt-out might end up specifically jettisoning the best training data.

Re: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 Intelligence, Performance and Price Analysis

#336
post #180

I have updated OpenAI's chart[1] from yesterday to include one more datapoint: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731. It's on the frontier. https://files.parasmittal.com/openai_aa_luna_dsflash.svg 1: https://openai.com/index/advancing-the-price-performance-fro...

LOL https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/deepseek-v4-flash#intel... High hopes for V4 Pro

Wait, Luna Max and Terra Xhigh are about as good as DS4 Flash Max? That's huge if true.

Re: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 Intelligence, Performance and Price Analysis

#337
post #25

If deepseek v4 flash is beating DeepSeek V4 Pro, can we expect new V4 Pro which is on par with Opus 5 in couple weeks (even better if it beats Opus)?

I’m salivating at the thought of this! Deepseek v4 Pro prices with Opus 5 perf would be freaking unbelievable!! This is probably a dream.

If that's marketed well it feels like it should cause a system shock like R1 did. It would also be interesting to see the reaction with code models becoming so good already i.e. cost efficient models aren't necessarily invalidated early by progress that matters.

Re: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 Intelligence, Performance and Price Analysis

#338

[flagged]

Please don't take HN threads into nationalistic flamewars, regardless of which nation you're for or against. It's not what this site is for, and destroys what it is for.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

Re: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 Intelligence, Performance and Price Analysis

#339

Earlier quoted context omitted.

same plan as always. stop from producing native capablity and then use the dependency to your advantage like becoming un attackable. cheap shit is more powerful that a nuclear shield.

But why would "we" want to attack them anyway?

you mean why does any country have a military if they dont plan to attack anyone?
Post reply on HN