I'm kinda tired of constantly reading about free speech and its virtues, and how people who don't have that culture are somehow backward. I know free speech is a good thing, but when you venture in the middle east, free speech doesn't matter because there is much less public order. Politicians know that people don't have this culture of free speech and must act accordingly.
Outside of the US, people don't consider using something as a political statement or general endorsement.
For example there are many politicians who are against europe in general. They still hold a seat at the parliament, because they can.
When poor people in africa use cellphones, should they change their opinion about the country it came from ?
What bothers me is the whole "you used a technology you were against and it helped you". Sure, it is contradictory, but when the stakes are high like in a coup, politicians have to forget their stance a little. It's another domain of scenario. History in politics is full of contradictions, so what bothered me is that easy sniping remark about social media while there's a freaking coup attempt. I don't think people care so much about a neat social media application while a parliament is being bombed. Those techs devices and infrastructure were paid for, everyone use them. The tech is not from there, so of course a politician won't really approve of it.
The general tone that bothers me is that when tech people read the news and they only read the tech part, not the rest.