Live data from Hacker News

Corporations are trying to hide job openings from US citizens

thehill.com

321–330 of 571 posts

Re: Corporations are trying to hide job openings from US citizens

#321
post #273

Why is hiding the jobs necessary? I applied for one of these jobs years ago. The recruiter told, "I have no idea how you applied for this job, but its not available for you. let me have you interview a different, but similar, role." What was I supposed to do other than say, "ok! Send over the other job description."?

I’m not sure why. Because they’re usually at salaries that you wouldn’t accept. Like paying 30% below market rate.

Re: Corporations are trying to hide job openings from US citizens

#322

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Thats some Wealth of Nations every worker can move the same number of bricks reductive thinking. I have been in the valley for 25+ years, and worked with a ton of visa holders. The majority of them were better educated and all well compensated for the work they did. The fact that many of them stayed for green cards and citizenship says a LOT. There is a reason that the boss of both google, and MS came through these p…

No it isn’t. There are two instances on this website where supply and demand seemingly do not apply. Wages in tech engineering, and housing costs. Specific carve outs are always made to make the conclusion that, for some reason, this positive supply (workers) and demand (housing) shock has no or marginal impact on wages and housing respectively. It’s very odd since most here work in roles where supply and demand of c…

Show me the reduction in cost for medical care when 1/4 of the doctors in the US are foreign born medical grads, the bulk of whom came through the H1B program.

Show me the American born doctors on the street going hungry while foreigners take their jobs. Show me the reduction in wages or costs.

> supply and demand seemingly do not apply. Wages in tech engineering, and housing costs.

Were drowing in data on both of these things and if you want to understand either of these markets from an economic standpoint then your going to need more than a surface level "supply and demand" argument when they look much more like "I, Pencil" levels of complexity.

Im going to say this bluntly, every terrible engineer I have worked with, who has been fired for being bad at their job has been American born and raised. We're not importing dead wood and dummies to fill in roles as cogs on the h1b program. These are smart people who end up in high level roles who end up staying and becoming Americans (agin raising the bar).

Re: Corporations are trying to hide job openings from US citizens

#323
I see lots of good ideas about changing the selection process. Another option is to change is to change the new hire process and require employers to advertise every recent H1B hiring decision for 60 days, including job description and resume. Then a native with an equal or better resume, and a willingness to fill the role, can raise their hand and offer to replace that person. If a native with a better resume is denied, then it is a cause for action against the employer (ideally a fine paid to the applicant that would at least fund further search time). Repeated violations would result in wholesale revocation of H1B access.

Re: Corporations are trying to hide job openings from US citizens

#324
post #315

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What do you mean “fair”? What happens in the years/decades between when this hypothetical system is enacted and when the US can train up sufficient workers to substitute the labor force we currently have with H1-B? Your proposal will mean 99% of all of the H1-B allocation will go to hedge fund quants and 1% maybe go to an AI researcher, but all of the materials science (eg. Cutting edge battery tech), semiconductor f…

Or... those other parts of the economy increase salaries for skilled labor? If we can only bring 85,000 people into the country on one type of visa, doesn't it make sense to prioritize those that will bring the most value (tax revenue, in this case)? And if that's not enough people... raise the limit? And be confident that a raised limit is still keeping a high quality bar on entrants?

Option 1: you give a visa to a quant with 2M/y today’s salary

Option 2: you give a visa to a PhD to work for 150k/year in a small biopharma startup that thinks it has the solution to cancer.

This salary stacked ranking optimizes for today’s worth of work. Not its potential.

Re: Corporations are trying to hide job openings from US citizens

#325
post #273

Why is hiding the jobs necessary? I applied for one of these jobs years ago. The recruiter told, "I have no idea how you applied for this job, but its not available for you. let me have you interview a different, but similar, role." What was I supposed to do other than say, "ok! Send over the other job description."?

I’m not sure why. Because they’re usually at salaries that you wouldn’t accept. Like paying 30% below market rate.

Is instacart a lowballer employer? levels.fyi suggests software engineers at L3 are getting 222k

Re: Corporations are trying to hide job openings from US citizens

#326

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Does the US have such a shortage of artistic talent we have to hire abroad for it?

Why get hung out on the example profession and not the fact that some jobs pay drastically disproportionate rates? Linus developed Linux, but we wouldn’t be able to hire the next version of him because hedge funds would dominate the high salary reqs in this hypothetical system.

There’s an O1 visa for exceptional talent.

Re: Corporations are trying to hide job openings from US citizens

#327

See for example a recent lawsuit accusing Tesla of running a systemic, ongoing scheme to replace or exclude US citizens in favor of H-1B visa employees.[1][2] > Tesla prefers to hire these candidates [H-1B workers] over U.S. citizens, as it can pay visa-dependent employees less than American employees performing the same work, a practice in the industry known as “wage theft.” > At the same time Tesla applied for thes…

FYI to anyone reading this, this is not what wage theft means. Wage theft is an employer not paying wages they owe to an employee.

Re: Corporations are trying to hide job openings from US citizens

#328
post #273

Why is hiding the jobs necessary? I applied for one of these jobs years ago. The recruiter told, "I have no idea how you applied for this job, but its not available for you. let me have you interview a different, but similar, role." What was I supposed to do other than say, "ok! Send over the other job description."?

> Why is hiding the jobs necessary?

Because they'd gave to commit outright fraud with no plausible deniability if they have to hide US Citizens applications for jobs they've earmarked for current immigrant employees' PERM. Hiding the jobs gives them deniability.

Re: Corporations are trying to hide job openings from US citizens

#329
post #257

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This conflates high education specialists with high earnings. It’s probably not completely uncorrelated, but only giving H1-Bs to the highest paying reqs which need them starves all of the other reqs of any possible candidates. I understand that H1-Bs are currently likely to create an abusive relationship with the visa-ed employee, but just because you have identified a valid diagnosis doesn’t mean your suggested pre…

Exactly this. Top 1% of artists earn about as much as the average software engineer. Ranking people purely based on salary is turning h1b into a visa for people in specific professions.

How about ranking on salary but by profession, so there should be a separate rank for software engineers vs. biomedical researchers.

Re: Corporations are trying to hide job openings from US citizens

#330
post #151
post #134

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yes, but because the H1-B holders have to find a new employer within 2 weeks or lose their visa, the threat of firing is the same thing as deportation, making for a form of indentured servitude. That forced loyalty, more than the salary, is the real draw.

It's 60 days, not 2 weeks, and you can transfer an H1B over to a new job within that 60 days, or if you know you're going to be terminated (e.g. you're on a PIP) then you can transfer the H1B to a new employer anyway. Wouldn't say it's necessarily easy to do so, but it's not an automatic deported from the country kind of deal.

Even 60 days is a short timescale to find, be interviewed for, and accept a job in a technical field. My last job application took nearly that much time just from the first interview to an accepted offer, and that's without the added complication of transferring visa status.
Post reply on HN