Live data from Hacker News

People from elite backgrounds increasingly dominate academia, data shows

washingtonpost.com

321–330 of 334 posts

Re: People from elite backgrounds increasingly dominate academia, data shows

#321

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Not sure I agree with it. I think you get a lot of Asian kids passing because they teach a lot of advanced things in their education system that are just beyond the curriculum in the West. Thus when it comes time to ask the clever questions, some kids already know the answer. I think in general people who know the answer to something misjudge how hard it is to figure out from first principles.

The grinds that can ace the test but can't speak are weeded out by the interview part. Just look on oxfords website for the admissions test. The TSA test for example is required on top of the math test. Of course you can train yourself to do these better, but because they are so specific to each major, there is not a test prep industry behind them. So it is a more natural test. https://www.ox.ac.uk/admissions/undergr…

There's no separate test prep industry, but private secondary schools will have extra classes for people based on what they intend to apply for. They also prep the kids for the interviews, for instance with mock sessions. That kind of thing is not available to ordinary kids. There's a wealth of Oxbridge application experience that is basically what such schools sell. I'm currently looking at them as a parent.

Isn't this what was depicted in The History Boys? The extra class for kids who wanted to get into Oxford? Can't quite remember.

Re: People from elite backgrounds increasingly dominate academia, data shows

#322
post #317

Earlier quoted context omitted.

this is not true. PhD coursework qualifies for Masters degree. Almost all PhD dropouts (on 1-2 year) - dropout with masters degree and a very nice industry job offer in hand.

Which industry? The English literature industry? The history industry? The philosophy industry?

phd students from low income background are not doing eng lit/hist/phil phd, never seen one. It is mostly people from affluent backgrounds who go there.

but I have seen more than enough econ phd dropouts who left academia with MS in Econ and a finance industry job offer. same for most of the engineering PhDs.

Re: People from elite backgrounds increasingly dominate academia, data shows

#323
post #100

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Quant trader at a firm that I've never even heard of but routinely pays even engineers 7 figures

I've also heard working at such firms has crazy finance hours too, which dissuades me from working there.

Are you an MIT graduate? I am told the recruiters don't accept job applications, they only reach out to people directly to invite them to apply.

Re: People from elite backgrounds increasingly dominate academia, data shows

#324
post #317

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Which industry? The English literature industry? The history industry? The philosophy industry?

phd students from low income background are not doing eng lit/hist/phil phd, never seen one. It is mostly people from affluent backgrounds who go there. but I have seen more than enough econ phd dropouts who left academia with MS in Econ and a finance industry job offer. same for most of the engineering PhDs.

"It is mostly people from affluent backgrounds who go there."

This is the whole point of the article, "People from elite backgrounds increasingly dominate academia"!

What do you mean by low income though? There's low income and there's affluent, but there's also the big middle class between those two.

Re: People from elite backgrounds increasingly dominate academia, data shows

#325
post #255

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>Picking a career path isn’t that simple. Who can really predict what will be oversupplied 4 (college), 6(college + masters) or 8/10 (college + PhD) years from now? Seriously? In the late 1990s, I was in middle school. My grand parents sat me down and told me to work towards a degree that makes a lot of money. They had lists of "typical starting salaries, by college degrees". We picked the top 3, and I started workin…

> Seriously? In the late 1990s, I was in middle school. My grand parents sat me down and told me to work towards a degree that makes a lot of money. They had lists of "typical starting salaries, by college degrees". We picked the top 3, and I started working towards those. I later reassessed and picked the top 1 - Electrical Engineering. And people from poor and/or rural backgrounds? I only got those discussions beca…

[deleted]

Re: People from elite backgrounds increasingly dominate academia, data shows

#326
post #100

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I've also heard working at such firms has crazy finance hours too, which dissuades me from working there.

Are you an MIT graduate? I am told the recruiters don't accept job applications, they only reach out to people directly to invite them to apply.

I'm a mid career staff engineer & manager, and like many I filter out recruiter cold emails.

Plus I wouldn't let that dissuade me from attempting to figure out how to break in if it lead to x2 FANG compensation rates consistently at the same work load.

Re: People from elite backgrounds increasingly dominate academia, data shows

#327
post #206

Elite schools want people from the power class. A lot of this is explicitly baked into admissions. Over 40% of white students at Harvard are side-door admissions (legacy, donors, children of faculty, etc.). This is especially true for minority admissions. For the most part, Harvard won't admit lower-class African Americans; they'll select from a much smaller pool who have already moved into the power networks. That's…

> Over 40% of white students at Harvard are side-door admissions (legacy, donors, children of faculty, etc.). I'm sure it's over 40%. It wouldn't surprise me if it's 70. There are a lot of side doors. My information is dated, but as of circa-2008, the Ivies were including ZIP code and paternal (but not maternal) profession in their predictive modeling. The interviews (which are evaluative, even when people say they'r…

It's 43%. You can do a web search. It came up in legal discovery for a perfectly reasonable discrimination law suit.

It distorts things a lot.

* Coveted non-ALDC slots are that much more limited and exclusive. Harvard looks harder to get into.

* Since close to half of the white slots are pre-stuffed, that makes the remaining ones that much harder to get into. That, in turn, leads to extreme affirmative action and no slots for Asians.

... and so on.

Re: People from elite backgrounds increasingly dominate academia, data shows

#328

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The grinds that can ace the test but can't speak are weeded out by the interview part. Just look on oxfords website for the admissions test. The TSA test for example is required on top of the math test. Of course you can train yourself to do these better, but because they are so specific to each major, there is not a test prep industry behind them. So it is a more natural test. https://www.ox.ac.uk/admissions/undergr…

There's no separate test prep industry, but private secondary schools will have extra classes for people based on what they intend to apply for. They also prep the kids for the interviews, for instance with mock sessions. That kind of thing is not available to ordinary kids. There's a wealth of Oxbridge application experience that is basically what such schools sell. I'm currently looking at them as a parent. Isn't t…

I don't know if you are from US or not, but the stuff over there cannot hold a candle to what happens in the US. I'm not saying it's totally meritocratic, but compared to US system, it is WILDLY more so for high performers.

Re: People from elite backgrounds increasingly dominate academia, data shows

#329
post #96

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I’ve suspected this. There was always some seed corn of this type at MIT, even in the old days. I got SB, 1968-72. Hacker was a new word, and nerd was often spelled with a “u.” It would have been unthinkable to try to prosecute Jonathan Swartz then.

Aaron Swartz you mean. though Jonathan Schwartz did get metoo'd (not prosecuted) and kicked off WNYC

Sorry, you are of course right.

Re: People from elite backgrounds increasingly dominate academia, data shows

#330

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There's no separate test prep industry, but private secondary schools will have extra classes for people based on what they intend to apply for. They also prep the kids for the interviews, for instance with mock sessions. That kind of thing is not available to ordinary kids. There's a wealth of Oxbridge application experience that is basically what such schools sell. I'm currently looking at them as a parent. Isn't t…

I don't know if you are from US or not, but the stuff over there cannot hold a candle to what happens in the US. I'm not saying it's totally meritocratic, but compared to US system, it is WILDLY more so for high performers.

I agree on that. There's no back door in the UK system, whereas the US system seems to be a front door with 1% acceptance plus a back door with maybe 40%. Choose your door with money.

In the UK system, even if you do have privilege, you still have to do the same exercises and the same work, and impress the same person to get in.

Post reply on HN