Live data from Hacker News

iOS 12 released

apple.com

311–320 of 373 posts

Re: iOS 12 released

#311
post #226

Earlier quoted context omitted.

In terms of a business sense, Apple's move to make privacy a core feature is almost the last differentiator they can make between themselves and other mobile device operators. Android has "won" the mobile phone war in the sense of device count (it wasn't always the case, remember). The premiere Android devices, e.g., Pixel, Galaxy, and some others all tack on hardware features generally superior to Apple's – maybe no…

Android phone CPUs are so far behind Apple's A12 it's not even worth debating.

Sounds like it is worth debating, please, provide the argument that demonstrates such a gap.

Re: iOS 12 released

#313
post #76

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It is a really interesting marketing move (and don't delude yourself, this is a marketing move). To market a feature that Google can't possibly compete with.

While their statement is a marketing position, Apple's fundamental focus has always been user = customer not user=product

Much like any other company that does not require user data to maintain business. It is easy for Apple to take this stance as they are a walled system.

Though it does not say that they guarantee the apps available on the platform are also as secure.

Re: iOS 12 released

#314

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Apps need to wait until the general release before they can push updates through the App Store.

it’s not in waze beta yet either though

On Friday they pushed a uuid beta/submitted testflight beta, according to their latest email. I just got a waze testflight update today, so I'm assuming that was what was pushed.

Re: iOS 12 released

#315
post #48

Earlier quoted context omitted.

My guess is that Apple is positioning themselves for an inevitable future where privacy is taken a bit more seriously or at least legislated against. While this seems far fetched right now in the United States with the Google ad monopoly, I think it will eventually come after some form of catastrophic leak (from some user data harvesting conglomerate) involving politicians or other powerful figures. Build the trust n…

"I think it will eventually come after some form of catastrophic leak" ... you mean like a credit reporting agency leaking out ssn and other very important data information of millions. To be fair, as a dedicated apple hater, all these events, plus google's more recent lack of morality decision making, has made me rethink which computer, phone, maps, and search engine I will be using moving forward.

No, that event didn't hurt the rich and powerful, just the average Joe. Something more along the lines of search history leaking or being used for insider trading. Something of that nature.

Re: iOS 12 released

#316
post #305
post #20

“Apple believes privacy is a fundamental human right, which is why iOS has always been designed with built-in encryption, on-device intelligence, and other tools that let you share what you want on your terms.” It isn’t often that you see any company the size of Apple take that strong of a stance. Privacy is their best feature and it seems like they are doubling down.

> Apple believes privacy is a fundamental human right But not the ability to run software not approved by Apple.

Apple also believe providing them with significant margins is also a fundamental human right.

I think this push is because other differentiators (that justify their 'premium' price) are running out...

Re: iOS 12 released

#317
post #171

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Provided this position is 100% genuine (and by all accounts, there is no clear indication that it isn't), that it comes from Apple gives the pro-privacy stance a hell of a lot of clout. If a company like Apple is investing in privacy then the consumer must assume that privacy has a lot more value than the government insists, no? For those who are security conscious it's a great reason to get an iPhone over an Android…

No one is mentioning that Apple is a hardware company first. They're not an ad company that makes hardware. Completely different approach and their stance for privacy makes sense.

What is absurd is that one of the two largest smartphone ecosystems (Android/Google) is run by a company for whom their supposed "customers" are in fact also a product, with Google double-dipping by selling us off to a second set of customers (advertisers). It boggles the mind how... understanding... people are to Google's business practices; "well, they're an ad company, so it just makes sense they they'd want to put devices into people's hands that vacuum up as much personal data as humanly possible – I'll buy two please!".

I roll my eyes every time someone talks about the "premium price" of Apple hardware. Apple hardware is not all that much more expensive; it's just not subsidized via tracking/profiling (loss of privacy), and subsequent advertising, the way the competition is. This has always been the case with Android/Google, and more recently even somewhat true with Microsoft (Windows 10 and its multiple shenanigans).

Re: iOS 12 released

#318

anyone know if css backdrop-filter memory exhaustion bug is fixed? if not, i'll wait for the point release.

Is there any particular reason why you want to wait until this bug is fixed? It seems unlikely you would ever run into it in real life outside of the demo.

just because of churn. there’s sure to be an update very soon. not because i expect to actually run across the attack.

Re: iOS 12 released

#319
post #199

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I've asked this before on here and didn't get much of a response. If Apple truly believes in privacy, does this mean that they have a strict policy against using the data provided by companies that have a lower ethical stance on data collection? Is it more ethical to pay and benefit from the data for targeted advertising than it is to collect the data yourself? Edit: On re-read I thought it might be unclear what I'm…

Yet Apple makes money from apps that collect data, made by developers.

> Yet Apple makes money from apps that collect data, made by developers.

If an app is free, but makes its money through data collection, then no, Apple doesn't make money off of it.

If they charge for the app, and then do data collection, then yes, Apple makes money off of the initial app purchase, but not off of the data collection.

Re: iOS 12 released

#320
> Contactless student ID cards. With contactless student ID cards in Wallet, you can use your iPhone all over campus to access places like your dorm, the library, and events; or pay for laundry, snacks, and dinners.

This sounds amazing.

Post reply on HN