Earlier quoted context omitted.
Smart TVs replaced dumb TVs not out of consumer demand, but out of subsidy from commercial databrokers and streaming services. Despite adding $100 of hardware they were priced $100 cheaper.
Is there still any specific brand known for dumb tv's that features the quality and 'non smart' options of the smart variants?
LG to ban residential proxies from smart TV apps
301–310 of 549 posts
Re: LG to ban residential proxies from smart TV apps
#302Earlier quoted context omitted.
Hope you don't have any open WiFi networks nearby. IMO it's better to put it on one of your networks and isolate it from the internet and other devices.
If it connects to another network, it's somebody else's problem. Unless of course, it has a built in webcam or microphone.
Re: LG to ban residential proxies from smart TV apps
#303Earlier quoted context omitted.
The monitors aren't installing anything. That headline was a lie. It's Windows Update that's installing LG crapware upon seeing relevant hardware IDs. That's why the problem affected older monitors too - it's the update side that suddenly started to ship malware.
> It's Windows Update that's installing LG crapware upon seeing relevant hardware IDs This is also a misrepresentation. Microsoft has provided LG with a certificate to sign its driver packages with, and allows LG to upload packages to Windows Update, which includes a feature to install sidecar applications. Now, the spirit of this feature is that any application is meant to provide genuine configuration functionality…
Self signing a driver should mean just that, not a driver, and a load of other things we feel like foisting on the user.
Half the reason I moved to Linux is because I just wanted to print something without getting a load of advertising from a printer company.
Re: LG to ban residential proxies from smart TV apps
#304Is there a (technical) difference between a residential proxy and bot network node?
Residential proxies operated by "legitimate" providers can only open TCP connections, which more or less rules out DDoS attacks, which seem to be the most common use of botnets. (And all tcp connections typically have to go through the proxy providers datacenter first to get through NAT, which effectively limits the total amount of traffic/connections you can make)
Re: LG to ban residential proxies from smart TV apps
#305None of my TVs are connected to the Internet. That said, I could really do with a better open source fullscreen UI, especially since I mainly just want a web browser that works good. I'm just using KDE Plasma with a custom daemon to control the TV power state over an HDMI CEC adapter plus an old K830 keyboard. I'm, frankly, a bit annoyed by this whole thing; I'd rather have USB adapter RF wireless because it is simpl…
As for remote control - why would you want one for the monitor. For the PC I'm using an Air Mouse which is just a remote gyro-based mouse with keyboard buttons with a driverless USB dongle that acts like any other USB HID. I also have a miniature no-name wireless keyboard with a touchpad but rarely need to use it.
Re: LG to ban residential proxies from smart TV apps
#306Earlier quoted context omitted.
I thought webOS was pretty decent initially. But LG never provided even a single major update to my TV in a decade, so that just about cancels any possible benefits from the faster code. I'm using Chromecast for several years now, bypassing and ignoring webOS completely. But the initial idea was nice, all those years ago.
Really? I've had many updates over the 7 years since my c9 was released, still getting them as recent as earlier this year I think.
Re: LG to ban residential proxies from smart TV apps
#307LG is on my blacklist. That means I won't buy LG products and in my job actively fight against buying products from them. And they put themselves onto that lost with their behavior.
Re: LG to ban residential proxies from smart TV apps
#308Sharing a slice of your internet in a privacy preserving way in exchange for something of value, seems fair, no?
Re: LG to ban residential proxies from smart TV apps
#309Earlier quoted context omitted.
20 years ago people would've called it a trojan horse. But then, by standards of two decades ago, every website that cannot legally avoid showing a GDPR popup would be classified as malware. As it should be today. Alas, standards have changed.
There were no cookie popups 20 years ago.
Re: LG to ban residential proxies from smart TV apps
#310Sharing a slice of your internet in a privacy preserving way in exchange for something of value, seems fair, no?
Only if the app provides 1. prominently-displayed, informed consent, 2. an option to opt-out without losing app functionality, or 3. joining the botnet provides some kind of actual benefit to the user, besides just money to the developer.