Live data from Hacker News

I built a demo of what AI chat will look like when it's “free” and ad-supported

99helpers.com

301–310 of 317 posts

Re: I built a demo of what AI chat will look like when it's “free” and ad-supported

#301
post #220

I understand the message this tries to tell but this is not how it will look. This is how dying cash cows look. This isn’t even dangerous, it’s just ugly and wouldn’t be used by many people. The real thing will look like ChatGPT. It will even answer WAY faster, because every microsecond means real money. The answers will sound real. They will even be useful. But maximally engaging. Each answer will end with a clickba…

>Have fun baking your Reese’s Original Peanut Butter cookies! I think it will be even worse. Like, "Im having terrible pollen allergies - what can I do?" Response will be very scientific sounding version of; You need some brand XYZ anithistamin , it will give the best effects, and the others you should only try if you low-key are looking to die.

It will pretend to have done "research" for you and will say something like "most recent studies (Madeup Author, 2026) suggest that the side effects of alternative brands are not well understood"

Re: I built a demo of what AI chat will look like when it's “free” and ad-supported

#302

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Reminds me of those absurd “selling web sites & apps like cable channels” graphics from the Net Neutrality wars. This one apparently originated at Reddit, natch: https://cordcutting.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/quink.png

I don’t think it was all that absurd. IIRC Portugal was already flirting with a system like that at the time. ISP’s wanted websites to pay them a fee in order to be accessible or at least not throttled, while also wanting customers to pay a fee to access sites/access them without being throttled. At least that’s how I remember it, it has been quite some time since I really went down that rabbit hole.

Indian ISP had Meta paying them to have their apps included in the unmetered list...

Far from absurd, reality.

Re: I built a demo of what AI chat will look like when it's “free” and ad-supported

#303

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Most LLM users are not techies

How does that matter? I can vibecode a ChatGPT clone in 30 min that uses gpt apis and sell it at subscription.

They'll just ban that...

Re: I built a demo of what AI chat will look like when it's “free” and ad-supported

#306
post #220

I understand the message this tries to tell but this is not how it will look. This is how dying cash cows look. This isn’t even dangerous, it’s just ugly and wouldn’t be used by many people. The real thing will look like ChatGPT. It will even answer WAY faster, because every microsecond means real money. The answers will sound real. They will even be useful. But maximally engaging. Each answer will end with a clickba…

Yes and no. What many call "dying cash cows" are often doing just fine, it’s just our perception of it that make them want to die. An example: Facebook. Could be considered a dying cash cows while looking at its products but it’s actually a growing business. Despise what their products are, their lack of innovation, and them not being able to compete against TikTok or make the app that will replace it, their business and so their stock have been all increasing.

Re: I built a demo of what AI chat will look like when it's “free” and ad-supported

#307

It’s strange to see extreme amount of hysteria on this. There’s enough market competition to not allow this. If ChatGPT is doing it then just move to Claude. If all are doing it then surely opensource models are a good alternative. But i think leaning into the hysteria provides some comfort

There's plenty of competition in the online news space, but every news website is bloated with the most annoying ads and toxic paywalls.

Re: I built a demo of what AI chat will look like when it's “free” and ad-supported

#308
post #302

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don’t think it was all that absurd. IIRC Portugal was already flirting with a system like that at the time. ISP’s wanted websites to pay them a fee in order to be accessible or at least not throttled, while also wanting customers to pay a fee to access sites/access them without being throttled. At least that’s how I remember it, it has been quite some time since I really went down that rabbit hole.

Indian ISP had Meta paying them to have their apps included in the unmetered list... Far from absurd, reality.

Didn’t even know about that, great example

Re: I built a demo of what AI chat will look like when it's “free” and ad-supported

#310

Earlier quoted context omitted.

No Lite! about it. I've twice unsubbed from YTP because they started showing me ads. Never again.

I've never seen an ad logged in to Premium. Content creators do sometimes insert sponsor segments directly into the video, but YTP offers a skip feature that works fairly well.

I've seen ads on the YT app for the nVidia Shield TV in multiple places. Sometimes ad-roll before/during a video sometimes as the first result in a search.
Post reply on HN