I understand the message this tries to tell but this is not how it will look. This is how dying cash cows look. This isn’t even dangerous, it’s just ugly and wouldn’t be used by many people. The real thing will look like ChatGPT. It will even answer WAY faster, because every microsecond means real money. The answers will sound real. They will even be useful. But maximally engaging. Each answer will end with a clickba…
>Have fun baking your Reese’s Original Peanut Butter cookies! I think it will be even worse. Like, "Im having terrible pollen allergies - what can I do?" Response will be very scientific sounding version of; You need some brand XYZ anithistamin , it will give the best effects, and the others you should only try if you low-key are looking to die.
I built a demo of what AI chat will look like when it's “free” and ad-supported
301–310 of 317 posts
Re: I built a demo of what AI chat will look like when it's “free” and ad-supported
#302Earlier quoted context omitted.
Reminds me of those absurd “selling web sites & apps like cable channels” graphics from the Net Neutrality wars. This one apparently originated at Reddit, natch: https://cordcutting.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/quink.png
I don’t think it was all that absurd. IIRC Portugal was already flirting with a system like that at the time. ISP’s wanted websites to pay them a fee in order to be accessible or at least not throttled, while also wanting customers to pay a fee to access sites/access them without being throttled. At least that’s how I remember it, it has been quite some time since I really went down that rabbit hole.
Far from absurd, reality.
Re: I built a demo of what AI chat will look like when it's “free” and ad-supported
#303Re: I built a demo of what AI chat will look like when it's “free” and ad-supported
#304Re: I built a demo of what AI chat will look like when it's “free” and ad-supported
#305This site gives me anxiety
Re: I built a demo of what AI chat will look like when it's “free” and ad-supported
#306I understand the message this tries to tell but this is not how it will look. This is how dying cash cows look. This isn’t even dangerous, it’s just ugly and wouldn’t be used by many people. The real thing will look like ChatGPT. It will even answer WAY faster, because every microsecond means real money. The answers will sound real. They will even be useful. But maximally engaging. Each answer will end with a clickba…
Re: I built a demo of what AI chat will look like when it's “free” and ad-supported
#307It’s strange to see extreme amount of hysteria on this. There’s enough market competition to not allow this. If ChatGPT is doing it then just move to Claude. If all are doing it then surely opensource models are a good alternative. But i think leaning into the hysteria provides some comfort
Re: I built a demo of what AI chat will look like when it's “free” and ad-supported
#308Earlier quoted context omitted.
I don’t think it was all that absurd. IIRC Portugal was already flirting with a system like that at the time. ISP’s wanted websites to pay them a fee in order to be accessible or at least not throttled, while also wanting customers to pay a fee to access sites/access them without being throttled. At least that’s how I remember it, it has been quite some time since I really went down that rabbit hole.
Indian ISP had Meta paying them to have their apps included in the unmetered list... Far from absurd, reality.
Re: I built a demo of what AI chat will look like when it's “free” and ad-supported
#309Re: I built a demo of what AI chat will look like when it's “free” and ad-supported
#310Earlier quoted context omitted.
No Lite! about it. I've twice unsubbed from YTP because they started showing me ads. Never again.
I've never seen an ad logged in to Premium. Content creators do sometimes insert sponsor segments directly into the video, but YTP offers a skip feature that works fairly well.