Live data from Hacker News

Whistleblowers are the conscience of society, yet suffer gravely

covertactionmagazine.com

301–310 of 510 posts

Re: Whistleblowers are the conscience of society, yet suffer gravely

#301
post #71

Whistleblowers act against power structures and that's the ultimate transgression as far as the power structure is concerned. Transgressions in favor of the state are one thing, you'll get a slap on the wrist at most, even personal benefit and promotion in some cases, but transgressions against the state are what will provoke a real response. See, for example, the incredible vigor pursued against the people who relea…

Yeah, and it's why I think it's fundamentally impossible to prevent retaliation against whistleblowers. Organizations act in favor of self-preservation, like any living thing. Whistleblowers by definition act against them, so an organization will always benefit by removing them. Failure to do so will prolong the damage and encourage further transgressions.

[dead]

Re: Whistleblowers are the conscience of society, yet suffer gravely

#302

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> You’re correct, it would be utterly illegal and they are in fact doing it via the five eyes program (FVEY) If they are doing it, where's your evidence? You don't have it because otherwise, Klayman would have filed a lawsuit.

[flagged]

I did. I read the actual documents Snowden leaked instead of relying on wild conspiracy theories people conjured up out of thin air at the time the documents leaked. If you have evidence, you can file a lawsuit. You don't. You're just repeating conspiracy theories that anybody who understands the law easily spots as nonsense.

Re: Whistleblowers are the conscience of society, yet suffer gravely

#303

It’s a travesty that Edward Snowden is still a fugitive in the United States. James Clapper went in front of congress and lied about the scope of surveillance on US citizens. Snowden saw it as his moral obligation to expose those lies, and he did it in the least destructive way possible by leaking the evidence to qualified journalists.

Your usage of the word travesty is a tragedy (and ironically, also a travesty)

travesty:

something that is shocking, upsetting, or ridiculous because it is not what it is supposed to be

“It is a travesty and a tragedy that so many people would be denied the right to vote.”

“The investigation into the causes of the accident was a complete travesty. [=sham]”

“The trial was a travesty of justice.”

https://www.britannica.com/dictionary/travesty

On to the differences between tragedy and travesty:

> A “tragedy” is of course a dreadful event or disaster that results in sadness, injury or destruction. While a “travesty” is more of a distorted or cheap imitation of something – often applied to the debasement of something held high, such as justice, rules, ideals and so on.

https://www.writerscentre.com.au/blog/qa-tragedy-vs-travesty...

Re: Whistleblowers are the conscience of society, yet suffer gravely

#304

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The program he was most interested in leaking (PRISM) wasn't illegal at all. He had plenty of time to figure that out, but he didn't. In order to leak this perfectly legal program, he tried to get asylum in Hong Kong by leaking Chinese systems the NSA had compromised.

The fact that PRISM was legal is exactly the problem, and why leaking it was needed. It wasn't illegal, therefore going through the proper channels wouldn't have exposed it. It is only by going through alternative/leaking means that the program could have gotten exposed to the public.

The government spies on foreigners who are suspected to be of national security interest. News at 11.

This is the government's job. Why do you feel it needed to be exposed?

Re: Whistleblowers are the conscience of society, yet suffer gravely

#305

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yeah, and it's why I think it's fundamentally impossible to prevent retaliation against whistleblowers. Organizations act in favor of self-preservation, like any living thing. Whistleblowers by definition act against them, so an organization will always benefit by removing them. Failure to do so will prolong the damage and encourage further transgressions.

Although, silencing whistleblowers is as weak a strategy as security through obscurity.

Yes exactly. Sunshine is the best disinfectant.

Unfortunately, it can take a very long time for the organisation in question to be exposed and then reformed. Just look at the child-abuse within pretty much every organisation that had access to children. However, that doesn’t make the fight fruitless; organisations can be reformed and it’s worth it for society as a whole.

We just need much much stronger whistleblower protections.

Re: Whistleblowers are the conscience of society, yet suffer gravely

#306
post #50

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Everything they're doing is "legal" because they get to decide what is and isn't legal. That doesn't mean it's ethical or should be hidden from the American public.

> Everything they're doing is "legal" because they get to decide what is and isn't legal No, phone metadata collection was ruled illegal. Ingesting court ordered FBI wiretaps on foreigners living outside the US who are of interest to national security has never been illegal in the US or in any other country. > That doesn't mean it's ethical or should be hidden from the American public. It isn't hidden from the Americ…

The USG can't put cameras in my house and promise not to look at the video unless I'm a foreigner. That's what this amounts to. Why anyone would defend this is beyond me.

Re: Whistleblowers are the conscience of society, yet suffer gravely

#307

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Although, silencing whistleblowers is as weak a strategy as security through obscurity.

I disagree, it is an extremely strong strategy. You shut them up, they cannot inflict any more damage. The public can speculate what other secrets exist, but they can't know as they would if the whistleblower was kept around. The short-term negative publicity is tiny compared to the fallout if more information was leaked. This is why organizations basically always move to silence: It works.

“As weak as” means “as strong as.” But in your scenario, weakness includes failing to adequately limit political or moral liability internally.

Re: Whistleblowers are the conscience of society, yet suffer gravely

#308

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Regardless of PRISM's legality, it's deeply unethical and immoral for a government to spy on their own citizens with nothing more than a permission slip stamped by a stamping body that approves 99.97% of the requests that cross their desk, which is exactly what the FISA court is.

PRISM doesn't involve data from US citizens' accounts. Please review what PRISM is before claiming it is illegal or unethical. It is neither. If you are incapable of reading the documents yourself: if the company receiving the wiretap order has any reason to believe that an account belongs to a US citizen or a non-US citizen living in the US, they challenge the order. No warrant is needed in the US legal system or th…

I'm sorry but reading your posts here is just comical.

Can you explain why there are countless stories such as this:

NSA staff used spy tools on spouses, ex-lovers: watchdog https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-surveillance-watchdog...

You keep writing they were not spying on US citizens, but clearly they were or NSA employees would not be using it to spy on friends/family would they?

Did they coin the term "LOVEINT" because this was a one-off situation?

Re: Whistleblowers are the conscience of society, yet suffer gravely

#309
post #244
post #116

I continue to maintain that Snowden was one of the greatest American patriots in decades. There are many leakers that deliberately act with the intention to harm the state; That wasn't Snowden - he threw away his life to stage an intervention. Why has he been left to rot in a dictatorship? I'd say sign a pardon for the man, but unless he can get out of Russia there's a damned good chance that things would only get wo…

I am 99% sure Snowden is cringing at the term "American patriots". Snowden's primary motivation was most likely opposition to US foreign policy and control of the world. There is no other reason to contact Glenn Greenwald in late 2012. In 2008-2012 Glenn Greenwald was primarily known as one of the harshest opponents of US foreign policy and someone who didn't shy away from defending Russia, Iran and other geopolitica…

He has stated his primary reason was that he was pro-privacy and anti-surveillance. There is no reason to doubt this. He had a huge trove of info he could have sold to China or Russia and he didn't. He has given us no reason to not believe him, and if you're paying attention to Washington you'll see why he didn't go through those channels, especially in the era of shipping off people to be tortured in other countries and "water boarding" is just "coercive means".

Re: Whistleblowers are the conscience of society, yet suffer gravely

#310
Most whistleblowers have a high moral and ethical standard. In current societies where people make it to the top lying, cheating and misusing or even suppressing others, we watch movies about Jedi and turn a blind eye to the dark side the minute the TV is turned off. Humans are an odd species.
Post reply on HN