Earlier quoted context omitted.
Check out Ungoogled Chromium, it's pretty great.
Chromium will still contain this change, in fact its where it will appear first.
Google to restrict modern ad blocking Chrome extensions to enterprise users
301–310 of 909 posts
Re: Google to restrict modern ad blocking Chrome extensions to enterprise users
#302For what it's worth, I've had a great experience with firefox for the past year (since quantum convinced me to give it another chance). All though, it recently basically factory-reset itself. Signed out of sync, extensions gone, custom settings gone. Any one else have this happen? It's also got a weird memory leak, which I think is related to the pdf viewer. Never really checked in detail or tried to measure.
Yes!!! I've had this happen several times, and it's incredibly annoying! I was just about to comment on this issue before I saw your post (as a "this is a good opportunity for Firefox but they still have some seriously irritating bugs"). It seems like my entire profile (about:profiles) got switched out several times with a brand new one. Exact same symptoms as you - bookmarks, custom UI tweaks, extensions, etc. all g…
Re: Google to restrict modern ad blocking Chrome extensions to enterprise users
#303Why exactly would anyone use the "enterprise" version of Chrome over the regular one, or vice versa? As far as I can tell, it's the same browser... https://cloud.google.com/chrome-enterprise/browser/download/
Re: Google to restrict modern ad blocking Chrome extensions to enterprise users
#304Another big issue is that if chrome makes it difficult to disable ads such that 99% of chrome users aren't able to do it, websites may simply choose to block Firefox as it would be easy to do so without losing a large part of user base while making sure no users are blocking ads. Right now there are far too many users using ad blockers.
Re: Google to restrict modern ad blocking Chrome extensions to enterprise users
#305Re: Google to restrict modern ad blocking Chrome extensions to enterprise users
#306Earlier quoted context omitted.
>almost the entire ad-blocking market is controlled by the company behind Adblock Plus (eyeo GmbH), who has contracts with Google. It appears they also own AdBlock, and uBlock (not confused with uBO), so during the last years they basically tried to capture the entire market. This makes me wonder if there's any way we can give gorhill a bunch of money in donations. He's in a much more important position than I previo…
If he explicitly says "No donations sought", wouldn't it be kind of rude to throw money at him?
Re: Google to restrict modern ad blocking Chrome extensions to enterprise users
#307[1] https://robinwils.gitlab.io/articles/sbcl-browser-engine.htm...
Re: Google to restrict modern ad blocking Chrome extensions to enterprise users
#308I'm glad I already made the switch to FireFox. I only use Chrome to access Google apps, because for some strange reason they work a lot better in Chrome... The only thing I miss is a Session Buddy equivalent. When my computer crashes, it's nice to be able to restore all my tabs and windows, and also it's nice to be able to close a bunch of windows when I travel and then go back to my tab state from three weeks ago.
In addition, I like the integration with Firefox Bookmarks. It creates a folder "Session Sync" and stores sessions as sub-folders. So, if anything happens, I still have them as simple, curated bookmarks.
Re: Google to restrict modern ad blocking Chrome extensions to enterprise users
#309Slightly off topic, I'm finding it very disingenuous that people in this thread(and any other threads that come up about Firefox) have actually had significant performance issues with Firefox. No bugs that are noteworthy, sans that fiasco with the expired certificate that disabled addons briefly. I've been using Firefox since "quantum" on both my MacBooks(one of which is old AF) and on Linux. I've yet to have problem…
The issue I have with firefox on both Linux and Windows is not speed, but stability. I think it's the process model. Windows freeze if I open too many tabs, and is an issue I've not really had much with Chrome (though it had its own issues). I've noticed it a few times today as well. I wonder if that's the speed issues people are describing?
With that said, removal of ad blocking is a deal breaker for me and Chrome will no longer be my default browser.
Re: Google to restrict modern ad blocking Chrome extensions to enterprise users
#310Earlier quoted context omitted.
The problem is the only way to combat Google in this regards would be for smaller players to come together and form an open-source working group based on a chromium fork. (The train has already left the station for anything besides WebKit or Blink, since the lack of accessibility of Gecko means it will never be adopted by anyone else.) But most of them are directly financed by Google and have almost no common ground…
Is that true? IE was incumbent and Firefox unseated it. They had the legacy of Netscape, sure, but they didn’t throw the towel and reskin IE the same way other browsers of the time did. Besides that, at which point does the dominant search and advertising company of the internet get an antitrust case for this? People think google is trustworthy yet they do nothing to earn that trust.
Pound for pound, chrome is ridiculously far ahead of internet explorer mid-2000's. IDK what the hell someone is going to have to do to upend chrome and its rendering components but is going to have to be great.