Live data from Hacker News

Google to restrict modern ad blocking Chrome extensions to enterprise users

9to5google.com

131–140 of 909 posts

Re: Google to restrict modern ad blocking Chrome extensions to enterprise users

#131

I recently setup Pihole as the DNS server for my entire home network and said farewell to my Adblock extensions. It's glorious.

My fear is something like pihole may end up being a temporary stopgap; it can only help with DNS queries that go through it, and so it too may end up in the same position as chrome + ublock origin. For instance, if chrome decides to use a trr or dns-over-https and removes options to change it.

Re: Google to restrict modern ad blocking Chrome extensions to enterprise users

#132
I propose we create a new browser fork due to this issue and back it by the main ad block developers.

The other issue is that Chrome on mobile doesn't support extensions.

They tried to away with not having ad-block on mobile this way. No extensions means no ad-block.

Let's just have a new browser based on Chrome that supports mobile + extensions and ad block and tell Google they can go pound sand.

Re: Google to restrict modern ad blocking Chrome extensions to enterprise users

#133

I recently setup Pihole as the DNS server for my entire home network and said farewell to my Adblock extensions. It's glorious.

My fear is something like pihole may end up being a temporary stopgap; it can only help with DNS queries that go through it, and so it too may end up in the same position as chrome + ublock origin. For instance, if chrome decides to use a trr or dns-over-https and removes options to change it.

True, but at that point you can elect to stop using Chrome altogether. #firefoxGang

Re: Google to restrict modern ad blocking Chrome extensions to enterprise users

#134
post #98

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This is why it’s so unfortunate and frustrating that people are depending so much on Chromium/Blink. Electron, various browsers that are just skins over the embedded framework... We were still dealing with legacy IE6 (and IE 7/8 by that point also) in 2013! Almost a decade since we got Firefox and the first version of Chrome. The web has empirically suffered through homogeneity and the lack of strong competitors in t…

The problem is the only way to combat Google in this regards would be for smaller players to come together and form an open-source working group based on a chromium fork. (The train has already left the station for anything besides WebKit or Blink, since the lack of accessibility of Gecko means it will never be adopted by anyone else.) But most of them are directly financed by Google and have almost no common ground…

Is that true? IE was incumbent and Firefox unseated it. They had the legacy of Netscape, sure, but they didn’t throw the towel and reskin IE the same way other browsers of the time did.

Besides that, at which point does the dominant search and advertising company of the internet get an antitrust case for this? People think google is trustworthy yet they do nothing to earn that trust.

Re: Google to restrict modern ad blocking Chrome extensions to enterprise users

#135
post #10

I'm glad I already made the switch to FireFox. I only use Chrome to access Google apps, because for some strange reason they work a lot better in Chrome... The only thing I miss is a Session Buddy equivalent. When my computer crashes, it's nice to be able to restore all my tabs and windows, and also it's nice to be able to close a bunch of windows when I travel and then go back to my tab state from three weeks ago.

There's also Tab Session Manager, which I've been using with great success for hundreds of years! https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/tab-session-m...

I tried that one but it didn't handle containers.

Re: Google to restrict modern ad blocking Chrome extensions to enterprise users

#136
post #4

Chromium / Blink is open source, we should be doing everything we can to get as many users using non-Google Chromium browsers. We really shouldn't be having to worry so much about Google's conflicts of interests. Brave and Blink-based Edge are looking to be better and better options. Another is UnGoogled-Chromium: https://github.com/Eloston/ungoogled-chromium Would love to see this latter option becoming something th…

Another excellent browser that users should be switching to: https://firefox.com

Unfortunately it is unbearably slow on MacOS.

Re: Google to restrict modern ad blocking Chrome extensions to enterprise users

#137
post #10

I'm glad I already made the switch to FireFox. I only use Chrome to access Google apps, because for some strange reason they work a lot better in Chrome... The only thing I miss is a Session Buddy equivalent. When my computer crashes, it's nice to be able to restore all my tabs and windows, and also it's nice to be able to close a bunch of windows when I travel and then go back to my tab state from three weeks ago.

> I only use Chrome to access Google apps, because for some strange reason they work a lot better in Chrome... DOS 2.1 ain't done until Lotus won't run

You just gave me flashbacks to when I upgraded from DOS 2.0 to 2.1...

Re: Google to restrict modern ad blocking Chrome extensions to enterprise users

#139
post #10

I'm glad I already made the switch to FireFox. I only use Chrome to access Google apps, because for some strange reason they work a lot better in Chrome... The only thing I miss is a Session Buddy equivalent. When my computer crashes, it's nice to be able to restore all my tabs and windows, and also it's nice to be able to close a bunch of windows when I travel and then go back to my tab state from three weeks ago.

This impacts you if you're on FF too... if this works and Google is able to monetize Chrome more directly than FF then FF is going to have less development resources.
Post reply on HN