Live data from Hacker News

Variable Cost Living Sadly Doesn't Work

drop.io

31–40 of 44 posts

Re: Variable Cost Living Sadly Doesn't Work

#31
I was without a permanent address during the month of June and looked at doing this, but the overhead seemed way too much. Places were getting taken before I could snatch them up for short term stays, and even then most people wanted months.

If you do need to do this, the YMCA has a number of locations with not-terrible prices. I ended up staying with friends, thankfully.

Re: Variable Cost Living Sadly Doesn't Work

#32

I think part of the problem is that he was attempting to find sublets to fulfill his space needs. This is a pain because each period of stay has to be negotiated, which is time consuming... especially when you are moving around a lot. What you really need to make this work is a provider of living spaces with set prices and set contracts for set durations. Think extended-stay hotels crossed with a fast food joint. You…

http://www.yesicanusechopsticks.com/capsule/

Re: Variable Cost Living Sadly Doesn't Work

#35
post #16

I don't see how you arrive at the conclusion. So the facilities are not there. That doesn't prove anything. One time, there were only mainframes, and "home computers sadly didn't work". I'd like to see some innovation by architects, for stuffless living. Since almost all of my personal things fit into a computer in the future, living space could be a lot more generic.

"Since almost all of my personal things fit into a computer in the future, living space could be a lot more generic." To me that's a truly dystopian future. I'd rather my skis, surfboard, bike, kites, hiking boots, etc were not virtual.

Maybe one could invent a small "personal container" with all the stuff, that can easily be transported around. The generic housing could have slots for the personal container.

Re: Variable Cost Living Sadly Doesn't Work

#36
post #16

I don't see how you arrive at the conclusion. So the facilities are not there. That doesn't prove anything. One time, there were only mainframes, and "home computers sadly didn't work". I'd like to see some innovation by architects, for stuffless living. Since almost all of my personal things fit into a computer in the future, living space could be a lot more generic.

"Since almost all of my personal things fit into a computer in the future, living space could be a lot more generic." To me that's a truly dystopian future. I'd rather my skis, surfboard, bike, kites, hiking boots, etc were not virtual.

Why do you have to have skis, surfboard, bike and kites just for you all the time? It's not like you can use them all at once, is it?

Maybe I would understand if you used one item per day, but I don't think even that's the case. Probably most of the stuff you mentioned is simply lying around 90% of the time, taking space and amortizing.

Re: Variable Cost Living Sadly Doesn't Work

#37
post #36

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"Since almost all of my personal things fit into a computer in the future, living space could be a lot more generic." To me that's a truly dystopian future. I'd rather my skis, surfboard, bike, kites, hiking boots, etc were not virtual.

Why do you have to have skis, surfboard, bike and kites just for you all the time? It's not like you can use them all at once, is it? Maybe I would understand if you used one item per day, but I don't think even that's the case. Probably most of the stuff you mentioned is simply lying around 90% of the time, taking space and amortizing.

If you own skis (or any of the other items), you don't just own some skis; you own those skis. They're sized to you, you've used them the last 100 times you went down a mountain, you're accustomed to exactly how they handle, and the left ski boot's padding is a little more spacious because your left foot is a little bigger, and has worn away the padding more.

Yes, you don't use them, but between the custom fitting and the emotional attachment, they aren't fungible anymore. Which is, I suppose, the point of the article: if you declare something to be freely exchangeable, then you can have a much more freewheeling style of life.

Re: Variable Cost Living Sadly Doesn't Work

#38
post #15

I really like the concept and I'm glad someone managed to try it out. I also immediately thought of Airbnb (good job on ramming your brand into my brain guys!), but there seems to be something missing that even Airbnb doesn't quite cover: standardisation, perhaps? If you're extending the parallel to cloud storage, sure, you can spin up and spin down as required - but you (generally) stay within the same provider to d…

There are places like that. It's called "corporate housing". take a look at oakwood.com. They have apartments in lots of cities around the world. A company would contract with them then on short notice could say "I need an apartment in London for a month". The company only deals with the corporate housing place, not the building owners and the buildings aren't dedicated to corporate housing, most are leased in the traditional way.

Lots of companies use these services for when they hire someone new who needs a place to stay until they move, or if they have locations in multiple cities and have an employee on a short term assignment away from home.

Re: Variable Cost Living Sadly Doesn't Work

#39
post #32

I think part of the problem is that he was attempting to find sublets to fulfill his space needs. This is a pain because each period of stay has to be negotiated, which is time consuming... especially when you are moving around a lot. What you really need to make this work is a provider of living spaces with set prices and set contracts for set durations. Think extended-stay hotels crossed with a fast food joint. You…

http://www.yesicanusechopsticks.com/capsule/

That... is ... fascinating! And fascinatingly practical.

Re: Variable Cost Living Sadly Doesn't Work

#40
post #30
post #15

I really like the concept and I'm glad someone managed to try it out. I also immediately thought of Airbnb (good job on ramming your brand into my brain guys!), but there seems to be something missing that even Airbnb doesn't quite cover: standardisation, perhaps? If you're extending the parallel to cloud storage, sure, you can spin up and spin down as required - but you (generally) stay within the same provider to d…

What about something straight out of Snow Crash? Take one of those storage space rental places, and rent out something like that on a daily basis. You might have to do some work on getting things like plumbing,etc in there, but it would be cheap space that could be rented quickly and for variable amounts of time. Of course, it would be relatively low-quality... but in Snow Crash he wasn't living in a 'high-class' nei…

I remember reading somewhere that there are hourly hotels in Japan, because of the extreme hours many "salarymen" work. You pay by the hour, just for the time you're there, for a shoebox barely bigger than the bed.
Post reply on HN