I am tired of seeing these takedowns of the same things with no broader structural critique. It has become a piece of groupthink now to decry the flowery language in acquisition announcements, flat design, whimsical/pointless products, greed, etc. But no examination of why things are this way, or what might change them. Disappointing.
Do you have thoughts as to why things are this way? I'd genuinely love to discuss them (and it sounds like you would too).
Ask most people to name the second largest search engine, and they'll draw a blank. Google is the alpha and omega. This means that most tech and tech-adjacent business like media is at the whims of Google's search results.
So with the modern internet, as far as consumers go, it's mostly winner-takes all. This trickles all the way through to everything else, including VC investment, "disruption", and cargo-cult design. If you're not following the current zeitgeist you're kind of left in the dark.
As for solutions, I don't think they'll come from designers. You can't ask the soldiers to just stop warring. It's a systemic problem and requires a systemic solution.
I don't see people understanding this or rallying together to combat it anytime soon, so I think it will end like most wars do. One side wins and writes the history books to make it all seem obvious in retrospect.