See however the previous extreme plane shootings, around 370 deaths total, by the US and Ukraine: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran_Air_Flight_655 "shot down by the United States Navy guided missile cruiser USS Vincennes on 3 July 1988," "All 290 on board, including 66 children and 16 crew, died" "The Fogarty report stated, "The data from USS Vincennes tapes, information from USS Sides and reliable intelligence infor…
also see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Korean_Air_Lines_Flight_007 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Korean_Air_Lines_Flight_902
No Russian
31–40 of 91 posts
Re: No Russian
#32Because I can't.
Whoever shot it down, obviously thought it was a military aircraft. They made a mistake.
If it's a mistake, it's not murder.
Re: No Russian
#33Re: No Russian
#34Re: No Russian
#35I honestly don't know how to feel about this. It's really just as deceptive in presenting a clear cut and linear case about the other side, as if geopolitics really are this straightforward, and not actually a cryptic clusterfuck. It's just as pandering as Russian propaganda, or any form of propaganda. That and, for what it's worth, I can see there being just as big of an incentive for Ukraine, as for Russia, to take…
The problem is, it wasn't intentional. They seem to have thought they were attacking a Ukrainian military plane. There wasn't any strategy in this.
Re: No Russian
#36Re: No Russian
#37- There is a lack of motive (seriously why would he?)
- There is a lack of identity (if it were the Separatists, are they really controlled by Putin to that degree?)
- The murder weapon happens to also be in the hand of the Ukrainian army (19 systems, 3 of them stationed in the range of the crash site) [2]
- The Ukrainian air control obviously let the flight deviate quite a few kilometers of the "usual route" which goes south of Donetsk. [1]
- The lack of prosecution in the case of Maidan snipers (and evidence against the Ukrainian gov't as being behind it) and the Odessa fire.
I am not saying who it was or who it wasn't. I just state that I seriously doubt anyone who claims to know it right now.
[1] https://twitter.com/VagelisKarmiros/status/48992616773114265...
[2] http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/07/18/us-ukraine-crisis-... 2nd paragraph
Re: No Russian
#38Of course there is corruption, autocracy and alcoholism. It is there for several hundreds of years, and we have to deal with that. But situation is actually getting better with time. You can't change loves of millions of people in an instant.
Propaganda is an interesting point. In fact, I think it is not strong enough to counter the massive western information war against Russia. I read BBC and NY times regularly, and constantly notice biased and one-sided view.
I think that the author fall victim to the NY Times style propaganda articles about the evil Putin, connected it with his experience and decided to support it. I don'think it is a objective point of view and it does not describe reality.
Re: No Russian
#39...maybe. The rest of the Ukrainian political elite is also fairly corrupt, actually. So I expect it to take a decade at the very least. See, for example, Romania and Bulgaria.
Re: No Russian
#40I honestly don't know how to feel about this. It's really just as deceptive in presenting a clear cut and linear case about the other side, as if geopolitics really are this straightforward, and not actually a cryptic clusterfuck. It's just as pandering as Russian propaganda, or any form of propaganda. That and, for what it's worth, I can see there being just as big of an incentive for Ukraine, as for Russia, to take…
The problem is, it wasn't intentional. They seem to have thought they were attacking a Ukrainian military plane. There wasn't any strategy in this.