Earlier quoted context omitted.
He's saying that the entire USB system won't be initialized, which means no keyboards that use USB.
Is it even that common to find hardware that will take a non-USB keyboard anymore? I've got some, but it's old .
Secure Boot isn't the only problem facing Linux on Windows 8 hardware
31–40 of 178 posts
Re: Secure Boot isn't the only problem facing Linux on Windows 8 hardware
#32Re: Secure Boot isn't the only problem facing Linux on Windows 8 hardware
#33What's wrong with agreeing to the EULA?
I'm genuinely curious - does there exist some relevant and concerning precedent here?
If this turns out to actually become an issue, it would probably harm Microsoft more than anyone - and would be a boon to manufacturers willing to bundle Linux on pre-built machines (such as the Alienware x51 or "developer" x13). However, I sincerely can't see anything coming of this threat.
Re: Secure Boot isn't the only problem facing Linux on Windows 8 hardware
#34What are the benefits of Secure Boot?
Re: Secure Boot isn't the only problem facing Linux on Windows 8 hardware
#35What's wrong with agreeing to the EULA?
I don't see why this comment is being downvoted. Certainly, agreeing clicking through the EULA isn't ideal, but is it anything other than a theoretical nuisance? I'm genuinely curious - does there exist some relevant and concerning precedent here? If this turns out to actually become an issue, it would probably harm Microsoft more than anyone - and would be a boon to manufacturers willing to bundle Linux on pre-built…
It would probably harm Microsoft eventually. It would harm whoever gets turned into a legal test case immediately - which is the sort of thing you avoid by not electronically signing randomly selected legal documents.
Re: Secure Boot isn't the only problem facing Linux on Windows 8 hardware
#36What are the benefits of Secure Boot?
My PC has one such thing, and it's garbage. I managed to find out how to put it into some sort of 'information' mode with less graphics and more info... but isn't a BIOS screen supposed to be a wholly info thing anyway?
Re: Secure Boot isn't the only problem facing Linux on Windows 8 hardware
#37What's wrong with agreeing to the EULA?
I don't see why this comment is being downvoted. Certainly, agreeing clicking through the EULA isn't ideal, but is it anything other than a theoretical nuisance? I'm genuinely curious - does there exist some relevant and concerning precedent here? If this turns out to actually become an issue, it would probably harm Microsoft more than anyone - and would be a boon to manufacturers willing to bundle Linux on pre-built…
Re: Secure Boot isn't the only problem facing Linux on Windows 8 hardware
#38Earlier quoted context omitted.
What's wrong with me setting my user-agent to "By allowing me access, you waive all rights and policies regarding my access." and then viewing your website? Hint: it's about as enforceable as a EULA, but just as obnoxious and offensive because it presumes too much and oversteps bounds. Still, in the grand scheme of things, my UA string makes more sense, as putting something online is practically tantamount to putting…
This EULA is unlikely to be unenforceable, as you have the option of returning the product to the manufacturer if you don't want to agree to it.
Re: Secure Boot isn't the only problem facing Linux on Windows 8 hardware
#39What are the benefits of Secure Boot?
It means you can have a crazy BIOS screen heavy with customised images that looks all 3li7e and stuff for the gamer crowd. My PC has one such thing, and it's garbage. I managed to find out how to put it into some sort of 'information' mode with less graphics and more info... but isn't a BIOS screen supposed to be a wholly info thing anyway?
If anything, what you're talking about has more to do with EFI