Live data from Hacker News

New gas-powered data centers could emit more greenhouse gases than whole nations

wired.com

31–40 of 147 posts

Re: New gas-powered data centers could emit more greenhouse gases than whole nations

#31
post #9

The AI data center narrative is the perfect storm: First most of the data center build out is happening in areas that have had little other opportunity so local resistance is muted. Abilene, Texas is referenced and is the kind of place my grandfather would lovingly say is where you go to learn to be a “dirt farmer” Second, every environmentalist in the US is fighting 100 different battles with the most anti-regulatio…

China invested hugely into renewable energy. Their grid is strong. Ours is falling apart and our renewable energy contracts keep getting shredded. Gas powered data centers is beyond dystopian

Re: New gas-powered data centers could emit more greenhouse gases than whole nations

#32
post #14

[flagged]

What?

Heavy fossil fuel use leads to health problems and given a large enough population deaths. Lung cancer, Asthma, heart issues etc

Guessing that is what GP means by body count

Re: New gas-powered data centers could emit more greenhouse gases than whole nations

#33
post #30
post #23

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>More productivity lends to more exploitation, because you can do more with the same unit of work, instead of getting the same result with less work.. But per-capita greenhouse emissions have been falling in much of the developed world? And you can't really claim with a straight face that productivity has been dropping from 2000 to today. https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/co-emissions-per-capita?c...

> But per-capita greenhouse emissions have been falling in much of the developed world? Only by the deceptive accounting trick of not including the emissions associated with overseas production of the goods consumed by the "developed world". If you include all the emissions that prop up the highest per capita consumption patterns on the planet then you see the highest per capita emissions attached to the highest cons…

>Only by the deceptive accounting trick of not including the emissions associated with overseas production of the goods consumed by the "developed world".

That does increase US's emissions, but not enough to change the conclusion:

https://ourworldindata.org/consumption-based-co2

Re: New gas-powered data centers could emit more greenhouse gases than whole nations

#34
Burning natural resources for bitcoin and chibi cartoon figures is the goal of this administration.

All while increasing natural gas prices through blockades and threats of secondary sanctions.

It will make oil billionaires (e.g., like the ones who founded the Daily Wire) very happy.

Re: New gas-powered data centers could emit more greenhouse gases than whole nations

#35
post #17
post #9

The AI data center narrative is the perfect storm: First most of the data center build out is happening in areas that have had little other opportunity so local resistance is muted. Abilene, Texas is referenced and is the kind of place my grandfather would lovingly say is where you go to learn to be a “dirt farmer” Second, every environmentalist in the US is fighting 100 different battles with the most anti-regulatio…

Don’t forget environmentalists have been fighting against nuclear energy for decades. Update: Since I’m being downvoted I’m going to add a little sting: Good luck with your solar power web servers and skipping flights. Poor judgement really does have a price. It’s now inevitable that it’s going to get a bit warmer… everywhere. We’ll be lucky to hit Net Zero by 2100.

Please. Show me a nuke that was under 10 billion over budget and less than 20 years late.

Seriously. Don't even try to insert nuclear power into the debate before you show it can be competently built, never mind safely run and waste safely disposed. But what about the French you say! The French are discovering they forgot to set aside money for decommissioning.

Re: New gas-powered data centers could emit more greenhouse gases than whole nations

#36
post #29
post #26

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Because it’s a dangerous technology where profit over security can have severe consequences. Not to mention the new risks now that drone wars are a thing. All those Chemical plants are already valuable target, no need to additional nuclear ones.

>Because it’s a dangerous technology where profit over security can have severe consequences. Yeah it's far better to have power plants kill a steady stream of people, but in a banal way that's hard to attribute, like coal power plants causing lung cancer.

Which is why coal power plants are being shuttered everywhere in favor of gas and renewables (and I suppose nuclear, sometimes).

Re: New gas-powered data centers could emit more greenhouse gases than whole nations

#37
post #4

Very quick Googling suggests Wired’s estimate would be ~1.9% of US emissions. AI data center investment is, at core, a bet on increasing the productivity of labor. That’s what businesses will pay for, and what will earn the big money. If US labor productivity rises by more than 2%—and implicit in the size of this bet is a guess much higher—US carbon intensity goes down correspondingly, and these data centers end up a…

Emitting more greenhouse gas is only a win if your goal is to hasten and worsen the climate catastrophe.

Carbon intensity is not the relevant metric.

And there's no evidence or historic precedent backing your idea that it would go down anyway.

Re: New gas-powered data centers could emit more greenhouse gases than whole nations

#38
post #17
post #9

The AI data center narrative is the perfect storm: First most of the data center build out is happening in areas that have had little other opportunity so local resistance is muted. Abilene, Texas is referenced and is the kind of place my grandfather would lovingly say is where you go to learn to be a “dirt farmer” Second, every environmentalist in the US is fighting 100 different battles with the most anti-regulatio…

Don’t forget environmentalists have been fighting against nuclear energy for decades. Update: Since I’m being downvoted I’m going to add a little sting: Good luck with your solar power web servers and skipping flights. Poor judgement really does have a price. It’s now inevitable that it’s going to get a bit warmer… everywhere. We’ll be lucky to hit Net Zero by 2100.

Nuclear is useful but it's hard to see it as a panacea. Renewable energy on the other hand is hard to beat. The economics of it keeps getting better, and previous estimates of the lifecycle of things like solar was grossly misrepresented.

Cancelling wind power contracts etc was a huge mistake.

Re: New gas-powered data centers could emit more greenhouse gases than whole nations

#39
post #17
post #9

The AI data center narrative is the perfect storm: First most of the data center build out is happening in areas that have had little other opportunity so local resistance is muted. Abilene, Texas is referenced and is the kind of place my grandfather would lovingly say is where you go to learn to be a “dirt farmer” Second, every environmentalist in the US is fighting 100 different battles with the most anti-regulatio…

Don’t forget environmentalists have been fighting against nuclear energy for decades. Update: Since I’m being downvoted I’m going to add a little sting: Good luck with your solar power web servers and skipping flights. Poor judgement really does have a price. It’s now inevitable that it’s going to get a bit warmer… everywhere. We’ll be lucky to hit Net Zero by 2100.

Something tells me if they manage to get nuclear plants accepted, they will be built far, far away from the billionaires' doomsday bunkers.

Re: New gas-powered data centers could emit more greenhouse gases than whole nations

#40
post #29
post #26

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Because it’s a dangerous technology where profit over security can have severe consequences. Not to mention the new risks now that drone wars are a thing. All those Chemical plants are already valuable target, no need to additional nuclear ones.

>Because it’s a dangerous technology where profit over security can have severe consequences. Yeah it's far better to have power plants kill a steady stream of people, but in a banal way that's hard to attribute, like coal power plants causing lung cancer.

It's not nuclear or coal. There is wind, solar, etc.
Post reply on HN