Excommunicated devs making games with AI

I mean AI art is for sure super samey and plagiarized and uninteresting stylistically

It's instantly recognizable and makes most indie games that disclose it just dead on arrival

I spent quite a bit of time making games/social WebXR stuff in Three.js. There is unfortunately a ceiling to what commercial success you can have there. Sure there's all the .io games which see a bunch of kids playing games from their school computers, but as much as I'd like to see it, web games aren't going to be as impressive as native PC/Console games. It's not really technology, mostly just the market isn't there.

The models are pretty decent at building simple Three.js/Phaser games, but if you want to work with Unity/Unreal/Godot you're going to need a MCP or other tool to get them to work with the engine's tooling/context. I just so happen to work on one for Unity https://bezi.com

I will say, while I think the current models are very impressive with generating code for most game mechanics. They are still terrible at spatial awareness. Gemini Pro 3.1 is showing some promise here, the latest Opus/Sonnet models are...ok. But there's still a lot left to be desired. You also still really need to know how to make games both creatively and technically to pull off prompting a game into existence.

So are you going to vibecode your way to the next SimCity / Civ without knowing some game dev? Probably not right now and I think that's for the best. People want games that are creative and unique. But a passionate hobbyist who has never made a game, knows some programming, and has a vision for a great game now has an amazing tool set to build their dream game and that's pretty cool!

I think the article is being s bit disingenuous. The real problem is triple A developers and publishers pushing for it to replace a not insignificant amount of creative work.

While still over charging everyone and scalpling every $ from everyone with micro transactions and game mechanics that need xp boosters.

I strongly disagree. Let me try and change your mind.

Let's say that you have been building your passion project; it could be a game, it could be a synth, it could be a mobile app. You were a year into development already when LLMs blew up, and you very quickly realized that you could leverage them to move much, much faster. This allowed you to tackle a long list of features that realistically would have never left the daydreaming to-do list because in reality, it'd have been a minor miracle to just get to v1.0 much less do all of the cool stuff you thought of along the way. This is the real power of the agentic workflow: in experienced hands, it's an incredible force multiplier.

And yet, even while your churning out features and knocking out bugs that you never would have found on your own without users being upset, the world gets progressively more and more pissy about this moment's Scarlet Letter. Suddenly mentioning that actually, you're getting amazing results from LLMs makes a significant percentage of people irrationally angry, leaving comments that would otherwise be appropriate to shame deviants and cheaters.

Suddenly, you're faced with a really awful realization: you'd love to loudly and proudly show the world how your LLM-assisted dev workflow has allowed you to produce something you honestly might not have ever finished in 2023, but if you do then people are going to write off what you've done as slop before even looking at it, and since you were actually thinking that maybe what you were building might have some legitimate commercial viability, you can't actually advocate for sanity and transparency without taking a serious hit to your product's success. By extension, this means that it might cause real damage to you and your family.

What I am describing is a chilling effect, and it is real. All of the billions in VC have literally nothing to offer someone who just wants to build cool shit and can suddenly do so faster and often better.

At the very least, consider that there is a tangible cost to telling the world that the thing you created exists at least in part because of AI but there is no such thing as people being more likely to pay for something simply because AI was involved. There is only downside. That is the chill.

It's not about victimhood. It is about not fighting battles that can only lose you ground.

The most fun games were made when code and resources to code/run that code were the constraints.