Ruby core team takes ownership of RubyGems and Bundler
31–40 of 407 posts
Re: Ruby core team takes ownership of RubyGems and Bundler
#32In the long run, having multiple sources like gem.coop is probably a safer and more robust solution. But for RubyGems specifically, the trust was fully lost, through several layers - maintainers, community members, sponsors, etc. There's still open questions that probably need to be resolved like the funding and data privacy stuff, but I think most folks in ruby land will be supportive of this.
This is just the tooling though, not "rubygems.org" which is still owned by a hostile entity (depending on where you sit on this), so not sure how this would restore any trust?
Re: Ruby core team takes ownership of RubyGems and Bundler
#33Re: Ruby core team takes ownership of RubyGems and Bundler
#34Re: Ruby core team takes ownership of RubyGems and Bundler
#35In the long run, having multiple sources like gem.coop is probably a safer and more robust solution. But for RubyGems specifically, the trust was fully lost, through several layers - maintainers, community members, sponsors, etc. There's still open questions that probably need to be resolved like the funding and data privacy stuff, but I think most folks in ruby land will be supportive of this.
Re: Ruby core team takes ownership of RubyGems and Bundler
#36These projects were not Ruby Central’s in the first place. They were stolen for Ruby Central by a Ruby Core insider, HSBT. This is horrible news. They were stolen from André Arko, Colby Swandale, David Rodríguez, Ellen, Josef Šimánek, Martin Emde and Samuel Giddins.
Re: Ruby core team takes ownership of RubyGems and Bundler
#37Earlier quoted context omitted.
So it’s okay for Matz to get HSBT to steal people’s open source projects? What if Matz sponsors stole Ruby from him? WTF?
> So it’s okay for Matz to get HSBT to steal people’s open source projects? Where is the theft? The projects were open source, they are still open source.
The name is not for the taking. You can download the code, modify and release it, but you can't just claim ownership over a product.
Re: Ruby core team takes ownership of RubyGems and Bundler
#38Decentralized package hosting is the only way.
I'm not counting something like C++ where there's effectively no "packages" to speak of.
Re: Ruby core team takes ownership of RubyGems and Bundler
#39Earlier quoted context omitted.
Matz is a pillar. Remember "Matz is nice and so we are nice"? s/nice/nice and responsible/gc.
[flagged]
The Ruby community respected his pseudonymity. Some of us already knew his name.