Sonnet 4.5 is beating Opus 4.1 on many benchmarks. Feels like it's a change they made not to 'remove options', but because it's currently universally better to just let Sonnet rip.
Claude Code 2.0
31–40 of 431 posts
Re: Claude Code 2.0
#32Just use `claude update` if you already have it. Unfortunately, they removed Plan mode, when I could use Opus for planning and Sonnect for coding. Though I will see how this pans out.
> Unfortunately, they removed Plan mode If I hit shift-Tab twice I can still get to plan mode
Re: Claude Code 2.0
#33I've always been curious. Are tags like that one: "" useful at all? Is the LLM training altered to give a special meaning to specific tags when they are found?
Can a user just write those magic tags (if they knew what they are) and alter the behavior of the LLM in a similar manner?
Re: Claude Code 2.0
#34Re: Claude Code 2.0
#35Just use `claude update` if you already have it. Unfortunately, they removed Plan mode, when I could use Opus for planning and Sonnect for coding. Though I will see how this pans out.
Re: Claude Code 2.0
#36tab-completion of filenames in the directory tree is now unavailable. You'll need to use the Codex style @file to bring up an fzf style list
Re: Claude Code 2.0
#37Earlier quoted context omitted.
I tried goose and it seems like there's a lot of nice defaults that Claude Code provides that Goose does not. How did you do your initial configuration?
What I've been trying to use it for is to solve a number of long-standing bugs that I've frankly given up on in various Linux tools. I think I lack the social skills to community drive a fix, probably through some undiagnosed disorder or something so I've been trying to soldier alone on some issues I've had for years. The issues are things like focus jacking in some window manager I'm using on xorg where the keyboard…
I've hit this point while designing developer UX for a library I'm working on. LLMs can nail boilerplate, but when it comes to dev UX they seem to not be very good. Maybe that's because I have a specific vision and some pretty tight requirements? Dunno. I'm in the same spot as you for some stuff.
For throwaway code they're pretty great.
Re: Claude Code 2.0
#38wow its way uglier lol, and why does it default to full screen?
Pardon my ignorance, but what does this mean? It's a terminal app that has always expanded to the full terminal, no? I've not noticed any difference in how it renders in the terminal.
What am i misunderstanding in your comment?
Re: Claude Code 2.0
#39I'm concerned that i don't see the "Plan with Opus, impl with Sonnet" feature with Claude 2.0.
I hope this is the case.
Re: Claude Code 2.0
#40wow its way uglier lol, and why does it default to full screen?
> why does it default to full screen? Pardon my ignorance, but what does this mean? It's a terminal app that has always expanded to the full terminal, no? I've not noticed any difference in how it renders in the terminal. What am i misunderstanding in your comment?
I just downgraded to v1 to confirm this.