Live data from Hacker News

Claude Code 2.0

npmjs.com

31–40 of 431 posts

Re: Claude Code 2.0

#31
To those lamenting that the Plan with Opus/Code with Sonnet feature is not available, check the charts.

Sonnet 4.5 is beating Opus 4.1 on many benchmarks. Feels like it's a change they made not to 'remove options', but because it's currently universally better to just let Sonnet rip.

Re: Claude Code 2.0

#32

Just use `claude update` if you already have it. Unfortunately, they removed Plan mode, when I could use Opus for planning and Sonnect for coding. Though I will see how this pans out.

> Unfortunately, they removed Plan mode If I hit shift-Tab twice I can still get to plan mode

I think they meant the 'Plan with Opus' model. shift+tab still works for me, the VS code extension allows you to plan still too, but the UI is _so_slow with updates.

Re: Claude Code 2.0

#33
Prompt: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/marckrenn/cc-mvp-prompts/r...

I've always been curious. Are tags like that one: "" useful at all? Is the LLM training altered to give a special meaning to specific tags when they are found?

Can a user just write those magic tags (if they knew what they are) and alter the behavior of the LLM in a similar manner?

Re: Claude Code 2.0

#35

Just use `claude update` if you already have it. Unfortunately, they removed Plan mode, when I could use Opus for planning and Sonnect for coding. Though I will see how this pans out.

They removed the /model option where you can select Opus to plan and Sonnet to execute. But you can still Shift + Tab to cycle between auto-accept and plan mode.

Re: Claude Code 2.0

#36
post #9

tab-completion of filenames in the directory tree is now unavailable. You'll need to use the Codex style @file to bring up an fzf style list

I think they had the @file thing before codex existed

Re: Claude Code 2.0

#37
post #11

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I tried goose and it seems like there's a lot of nice defaults that Claude Code provides that Goose does not. How did you do your initial configuration?

What I've been trying to use it for is to solve a number of long-standing bugs that I've frankly given up on in various Linux tools. I think I lack the social skills to community drive a fix, probably through some undiagnosed disorder or something so I've been trying to soldier alone on some issues I've had for years. The issues are things like focus jacking in some window manager I'm using on xorg where the keyboard…

> Maybe in some fields I've surpassed a point where llms are useful?

I've hit this point while designing developer UX for a library I'm working on. LLMs can nail boilerplate, but when it comes to dev UX they seem to not be very good. Maybe that's because I have a specific vision and some pretty tight requirements? Dunno. I'm in the same spot as you for some stuff.

For throwaway code they're pretty great.

Re: Claude Code 2.0

#38

wow its way uglier lol, and why does it default to full screen?

> why does it default to full screen?

Pardon my ignorance, but what does this mean? It's a terminal app that has always expanded to the full terminal, no? I've not noticed any difference in how it renders in the terminal.

What am i misunderstanding in your comment?

Re: Claude Code 2.0

#39

I'm concerned that i don't see the "Plan with Opus, impl with Sonnet" feature with Claude 2.0.

If Sonnet 4.5 is always better than Opus 4.1, then it doesn't make sense to plan with Opus.

I hope this is the case.

Re: Claude Code 2.0

#40

wow its way uglier lol, and why does it default to full screen?

> why does it default to full screen? Pardon my ignorance, but what does this mean? It's a terminal app that has always expanded to the full terminal, no? I've not noticed any difference in how it renders in the terminal. What am i misunderstanding in your comment?

A tui does not have to start full screen, v1 of claude did not take over the entire terminal, it would only use a bit at the bottom and scroll up until it was full screen.

I just downgraded to v1 to confirm this.

Post reply on HN