I am obviously a bit early, as my oldest is only 7, but my wife and I decided to force ourselves to delay getting our kids (7 & 4) their own media device, such as an iPad and go straight to a laptop when it becomes a necessity in school. My 7 year old, with immense attention issues, is obsessed with reading and being creative, I could not imagine her being at her reading level if she had an iPad or some other form of…
My daughter has an iPad (we limit to 2 hours of screens) but she also loves reading and will read for hours a day.
The TikTok documents: Stripping teens and boosting 'attractive' people
31–40 of 137 posts
Re: The TikTok documents: Stripping teens and boosting 'attractive' people
#32I am obviously a bit early, as my oldest is only 7, but my wife and I decided to force ourselves to delay getting our kids (7 & 4) their own media device, such as an iPad and go straight to a laptop when it becomes a necessity in school. My 7 year old, with immense attention issues, is obsessed with reading and being creative, I could not imagine her being at her reading level if she had an iPad or some other form of…
There is no evidence that it has had any negative effects.
The problem is exclusively with social media. And in particular the way it is having young kids being shaped by adult role models e.g. Andrew Tate, Mr Beast who don't have their wellbeing in mind. And being subjected to adult themed content in volumes we've never seen before.
Re: The TikTok documents: Stripping teens and boosting 'attractive' people
#33Curious how tech-oriented parents here are approaching TikTok et al with their kids. My kid isn't walking yet, but for when the time comes, I'm not sure how I'll limit exposure to what I'd call "pure trash", but also give them freedom and the ability to 'fit in' with (inevitably) the rest of their friends using this stuff.
No phone until early to mid teens, flip/dumb phone only until they buy their own.
Re: The TikTok documents: Stripping teens and boosting 'attractive' people
#34Curious how tech-oriented parents here are approaching TikTok et al with their kids. My kid isn't walking yet, but for when the time comes, I'm not sure how I'll limit exposure to what I'd call "pure trash", but also give them freedom and the ability to 'fit in' with (inevitably) the rest of their friends using this stuff.
Keep it simple dude. All they get is a basic device with text/RCS and call capabilities. I would be okay with giving a kid just a smart watch. No social media or smart phones until 16 y/o. Also making sure kids have friends in their community is a plus. Involve them in school programs, help guide them as they find their interest. For love of god, don’t give your kid an unlocked iPad with YT/TT/FB/Twitch/kick.
Social media does some harm. Being socially excluded does far _more_ harm. Which starts to happen in middle school.
So as a parent, you have three choices:
1. Deal with the emotional consequences of your kid being systematically excluded and having few/no friends.
2. Construct an alternative school/community with like-minded parents and kids.
3. Just give them the damn device, with screen time restrictions and the understanding that you'll be monitoring their activity. Follow through and be involved in their social life, with open and honest conversations about what happens online.
It turns out most good parents these days opt for #3.
Re: The TikTok documents: Stripping teens and boosting 'attractive' people
#35Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yup. This is what I see missing from all the non-parents or parents of kids under 10 on HN. Once middle school hits their whole friend/support system is probably on SnapChat and if you're not on there, you're instantly excluded from everything.
Imagine growing up without a phone in the 90s. That’s what these Luddite patents are advocating. It’s hard. We actually have banned social media until 16, but fortunately iMessage was the defacto coordination and we accepted that. No TikTok until adults, for a host of reasons.
Re: The TikTok documents: Stripping teens and boosting 'attractive' people
#36Re: The TikTok documents: Stripping teens and boosting 'attractive' people
#37Earlier quoted context omitted.
Agreed, TikTok is just the best at it; plus it is the only viable non-US threat to US tech giants, therefore it’s the villain.
TikTok isn't remotely a threat to any of the US tech giants. And the idea that Meta has never been considered a villain is just laughable.
"Considered a villain" -- this means nothing unless action is taken. Meta has just gotten, in two whole decades, a few mock interviews in Congress and not more than that, left untouched primarily due to Section 230 and the convenience that a mass social network of 2B+ users worldwide happens to be US-based (not fiscally, of course.) And that is after the various leaks showing how it psychologically manipulates teens, lends itself to electioneering and genocide, etc. TikTok, on the other hand, has made it all the way to Congressional ban level in just a few years.
Re: The TikTok documents: Stripping teens and boosting 'attractive' people
#38Earlier quoted context omitted.
If you do that, your kid won't fit in and will be a social outcast
But at least they’ll be functional with a potentially positive trajectory vs their peers.
Being excluded is not setting them up on a positive trajectory.