Live data from Hacker News

Colima: Container runtimes on macOS (and Linux) with minimal setup

github.com

31–40 of 61 posts

Re: Colima: Container runtimes on macOS (and Linux) with minimal setup

#31

Personally I'll be sticking to Rancher Desktop[1] It's backed by SuSE so it's going to be supported and not dependent on a single maintainer. From my perspective, the last thing I want to do is waste my time debugging my container runtime, I just want to get on with the job. It's based also around K3s, which is well suited to desktop environments. The list goes on... [1] https://rancherdesktop.io

Rancher Desktop also runs on Windows, whereas Colima doesn't.

Re: Colima: Container runtimes on macOS (and Linux) with minimal setup

#32
post #27
post #7

Earlier quoted context omitted.

(I work on OrbStack.) Fair point. Any missing features that you've noticed in particular? Edit: OrbStack will also most likely remain free for personal non-commercial use.

Please have a personal license that allows commercial use by the licensee, often it's hard to convince your company to get something just for you and I'm happy to pay for a tool I already use so I don't have to context switch. (I did so for Obsidian and Berkeley Mono).

To add to this I have purchased my own Jetbrains All Products subscription for many years now for exactly this reason. I bring my tools with me, I want to use them on commercial products I develop for companies I work for and I don't want the hassle of them trying to license software for me.

This is the status quo for Java tools at the very least, i.e IDEA, YourKit, etc.

Re: Colima: Container runtimes on macOS (and Linux) with minimal setup

#33
post #19

Personally I'll be sticking to Rancher Desktop[1] It's backed by SuSE so it's going to be supported and not dependent on a single maintainer. From my perspective, the last thing I want to do is waste my time debugging my container runtime, I just want to get on with the job. It's based also around K3s, which is well suited to desktop environments. The list goes on... [1] https://rancherdesktop.io

Does it work with Podman? Does it have support for docker-compose files?

No and yes (via docker-cli, the open source part)

https://github.com/abiosoft/colima/issues/627

Re: Colima: Container runtimes on macOS (and Linux) with minimal setup

#35
Can you do cross-platform builds on it with buildx on M1 yet? What's the story around shared volumes? How about local registry running? Will it work with DB test containers in Java? How about Java clients that use the docker socket, like maven's docker plugin?

Re: Colima: Container runtimes on macOS (and Linux) with minimal setup

#36

Tangentially related but I wish people would stop recommending nix-env and just in general ad-hoc installation on using Nix. It defeats the purpose of using Nix in the first place. If you want to try a package out, there’s "nix shell" or "nix-shell -p" if you’re not using flakes. If you want to install a package you should put it in your configuration instead.

You mean pretty much the very first thing that the Nix Manual suggest in the Quick Start:

https://nixos.org/manual/nix/stable/quick-start.html

and then later again in the Basic Package Management section:

https://nixos.org/manual/nix/stable/package-management/basic...

I fully agree that it is using Nix in the wrong way. But if it's something that Nix's own manual suggest, you can't blame people for doing the same.

Re: Colima: Container runtimes on macOS (and Linux) with minimal setup

#37
post #30
post #24

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Rancher desktop has a bloated electron GUI and and just keep in mind that Rancher as a company is going the way of dust - already about as relevant as SuSE.

What do you see as a replacement for Rancher? I haven’t seen any offerings that out of the box work behind a firewall. Tanzu Mission Control failed this, D2iQ Kommander fails at it as of 2.0. EKS Anywhere doesn’t have that either afaik.

[dead]

Re: Colima: Container runtimes on macOS (and Linux) with minimal setup

#39
post #24

Personally I'll be sticking to Rancher Desktop[1] It's backed by SuSE so it's going to be supported and not dependent on a single maintainer. From my perspective, the last thing I want to do is waste my time debugging my container runtime, I just want to get on with the job. It's based also around K3s, which is well suited to desktop environments. The list goes on... [1] https://rancherdesktop.io

Rancher desktop has a bloated electron GUI and and just keep in mind that Rancher as a company is going the way of dust - already about as relevant as SuSE.

[deleted]
Post reply on HN