Personally I'll be sticking to Rancher Desktop[1] It's backed by SuSE so it's going to be supported and not dependent on a single maintainer. From my perspective, the last thing I want to do is waste my time debugging my container runtime, I just want to get on with the job. It's based also around K3s, which is well suited to desktop environments. The list goes on... [1] https://rancherdesktop.io
Colima: Container runtimes on macOS (and Linux) with minimal setup
31–40 of 61 posts
Re: Colima: Container runtimes on macOS (and Linux) with minimal setup
#32Earlier quoted context omitted.
(I work on OrbStack.) Fair point. Any missing features that you've noticed in particular? Edit: OrbStack will also most likely remain free for personal non-commercial use.
Please have a personal license that allows commercial use by the licensee, often it's hard to convince your company to get something just for you and I'm happy to pay for a tool I already use so I don't have to context switch. (I did so for Obsidian and Berkeley Mono).
This is the status quo for Java tools at the very least, i.e IDEA, YourKit, etc.
Re: Colima: Container runtimes on macOS (and Linux) with minimal setup
#33Personally I'll be sticking to Rancher Desktop[1] It's backed by SuSE so it's going to be supported and not dependent on a single maintainer. From my perspective, the last thing I want to do is waste my time debugging my container runtime, I just want to get on with the job. It's based also around K3s, which is well suited to desktop environments. The list goes on... [1] https://rancherdesktop.io
Does it work with Podman? Does it have support for docker-compose files?
Re: Colima: Container runtimes on macOS (and Linux) with minimal setup
#34Re: Colima: Container runtimes on macOS (and Linux) with minimal setup
#35Re: Colima: Container runtimes on macOS (and Linux) with minimal setup
#36Tangentially related but I wish people would stop recommending nix-env and just in general ad-hoc installation on using Nix. It defeats the purpose of using Nix in the first place. If you want to try a package out, there’s "nix shell" or "nix-shell -p" if you’re not using flakes. If you want to install a package you should put it in your configuration instead.
https://nixos.org/manual/nix/stable/quick-start.html
and then later again in the Basic Package Management section:
https://nixos.org/manual/nix/stable/package-management/basic...
I fully agree that it is using Nix in the wrong way. But if it's something that Nix's own manual suggest, you can't blame people for doing the same.
Re: Colima: Container runtimes on macOS (and Linux) with minimal setup
#37Earlier quoted context omitted.
Rancher desktop has a bloated electron GUI and and just keep in mind that Rancher as a company is going the way of dust - already about as relevant as SuSE.
What do you see as a replacement for Rancher? I haven’t seen any offerings that out of the box work behind a firewall. Tanzu Mission Control failed this, D2iQ Kommander fails at it as of 2.0. EKS Anywhere doesn’t have that either afaik.
Re: Colima: Container runtimes on macOS (and Linux) with minimal setup
#38Re: Colima: Container runtimes on macOS (and Linux) with minimal setup
#39Personally I'll be sticking to Rancher Desktop[1] It's backed by SuSE so it's going to be supported and not dependent on a single maintainer. From my perspective, the last thing I want to do is waste my time debugging my container runtime, I just want to get on with the job. It's based also around K3s, which is well suited to desktop environments. The list goes on... [1] https://rancherdesktop.io
Rancher desktop has a bloated electron GUI and and just keep in mind that Rancher as a company is going the way of dust - already about as relevant as SuSE.
Re: Colima: Container runtimes on macOS (and Linux) with minimal setup
#40It is a project by Canonical and has a decent amount of features to get the job done. However, it only supports Ubuntu VMs and has some rough edges.