- UI has progressively gotten more bloated - too many articles that read like they were written by an LLM - the service provided is easily replaceable At least substack has a niche with conservatives. Medium, not so much
Ask HN: Why did medium.com "fail"?
31–40 of 567 posts
Re: Ask HN: Why did medium.com "fail"?
#32Because adblockers have made selling "free" content to astute, tech-literate people extremely difficut, and in 2023 micropayment/subscription models are still hopelessly bad .
Re: Ask HN: Why did medium.com "fail"?
#33They went completely crap on every single aspect. See the source code of a page that call itself "minimalist". Then see their business model… (I wrote about it 6 years ago: https://ploum.net/an-open-pay-wall-has-medium-lost-its-mind/... )
Re: Ask HN: Why did medium.com "fail"?
#34Re: Ask HN: Why did medium.com "fail"?
#35A product is great. The company providing the product raises lots of money.
Investors want a return on their investment and the founders want a big payday. So the company starts adding lots of features to increase sign-ups, conversions, and revenue.
But these features often poison the user experience. Even as numbers go up in the near-term, the product withers and dies as users eventually defect.
Companies with a moat can get away with this, like Reddit and YouTube, at least for a while. Medium had no real moat, so users left.
Re: Ask HN: Why did medium.com "fail"?
#36So paying (or registering) for access to view content which was likely to be fluff wasn't attractive.
There was definitely some valuable content on Medium, but it was lost in a sea of noise.
Re: Ask HN: Why did medium.com "fail"?
#371) Easy to setup
2) Incredibly SEO friendly
3) Most importantly: you own your content.
Yes - it's not as technically advanced as engineers would like - but let's be real - it's a blog - not a venture funded startup.
Buy your own domain. Own your content. Then, just write. If you need help, you can even get it set up for you for free → https://startablog.com/free-blog
Re: Ask HN: Why did medium.com "fail"?
#38Earlier quoted context omitted.
Long form content will become more niche, at least when it comes to text. I prefer long form reading content over short form content so it's nice having platforms like Substack and Medium, but IMO there needs to be something better. I would love a new social blogging platform that actually does well at showing you content you'd enjoy AND that ensures the posts are quality. Easier said than done I imagine.
This made me sad. Long form content is the content I get the most value from. Short-form is largely pointless.
Re: Ask HN: Why did medium.com "fail"?
#39When Medium instituted their paywall they enshittified the user experience.
Re: Ask HN: Why did medium.com "fail"?
#40Not sure what HN has against wordpress, but it's still the GOAT in terms of blogging platforms. It's 1) Easy to setup 2) Incredibly SEO friendly 3) Most importantly: you own your content. Yes - it's not as technically advanced as engineers would like - but let's be real - it's a blog - not a venture funded startup. Buy your own domain. Own your content. Then, just write. If you need help, you can even get it set up f…
It's perfect for blogging. It's a disaster for everything else people do with it.