Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: Why did medium.com "fail"?

news.ycombinator.com

31–40 of 567 posts

Re: Ask HN: Why did medium.com "fail"?

#31

- UI has progressively gotten more bloated - too many articles that read like they were written by an LLM - the service provided is easily replaceable At least substack has a niche with conservatives. Medium, not so much

That's a strange characterization because none of my substacks are anywhere near being conservative.

Re: Ask HN: Why did medium.com "fail"?

#32
post #27

Because adblockers have made selling "free" content to astute, tech-literate people extremely difficut, and in 2023 micropayment/subscription models are still hopelessly bad .

Adblockers only caught on because the internet ad industry is incredibly abusive.

Re: Ask HN: Why did medium.com "fail"?

#33
post #23

They went completely crap on every single aspect. See the source code of a page that call itself "minimalist". Then see their business model… (I wrote about it 6 years ago: https://ploum.net/an-open-pay-wall-has-medium-lost-its-mind/... )

Great blog. You made good points and I'm sure many of us feel the same way.

Re: Ask HN: Why did medium.com "fail"?

#35
It's a common story.

A product is great. The company providing the product raises lots of money.

Investors want a return on their investment and the founders want a big payday. So the company starts adding lots of features to increase sign-ups, conversions, and revenue.

But these features often poison the user experience. Even as numbers go up in the near-term, the product withers and dies as users eventually defect.

Companies with a moat can get away with this, like Reddit and YouTube, at least for a while. Medium had no real moat, so users left.

Re: Ask HN: Why did medium.com "fail"?

#36
It got stuffed full of low quality content, much of which felt like assignments from developer boot-camp students... and then the paywall arrived.

So paying (or registering) for access to view content which was likely to be fluff wasn't attractive.

There was definitely some valuable content on Medium, but it was lost in a sea of noise.

Re: Ask HN: Why did medium.com "fail"?

#37
Not sure what HN has against wordpress, but it's still the GOAT in terms of blogging platforms. It's

1) Easy to setup

2) Incredibly SEO friendly

3) Most importantly: you own your content.

Yes - it's not as technically advanced as engineers would like - but let's be real - it's a blog - not a venture funded startup.

Buy your own domain. Own your content. Then, just write. If you need help, you can even get it set up for you for free → https://startablog.com/free-blog

Re: Ask HN: Why did medium.com "fail"?

#38
post #30

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Long form content will become more niche, at least when it comes to text. I prefer long form reading content over short form content so it's nice having platforms like Substack and Medium, but IMO there needs to be something better. I would love a new social blogging platform that actually does well at showing you content you'd enjoy AND that ensures the posts are quality. Easier said than done I imagine.

This made me sad. Long form content is the content I get the most value from. Short-form is largely pointless.

I agree with you, but the younger generations are going to be the "leaders" of the world and they love short form content. Everything points towards short form content being the biggest thing while long form content and text content becomes niche.

Re: Ask HN: Why did medium.com "fail"?

#40

Not sure what HN has against wordpress, but it's still the GOAT in terms of blogging platforms. It's 1) Easy to setup 2) Incredibly SEO friendly 3) Most importantly: you own your content. Yes - it's not as technically advanced as engineers would like - but let's be real - it's a blog - not a venture funded startup. Buy your own domain. Own your content. Then, just write. If you need help, you can even get it set up f…

No one here hates WordPress because people use it for blogging. We hate it because other people use it as a complex, insecure, messy, un-versioned CMS that some of us had to inherit.

It's perfect for blogging. It's a disaster for everything else people do with it.

Post reply on HN