Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: What's your Linux window manager and/or desktop environment?

news.ycombinator.com

31–40 of 60 posts

Re: Ask HN: What's your Linux window manager and/or desktop environment?

#33
Dwm here (it's like i3 or awesome: a tiling wm).

I love tiling WM and would.never go back to "floating" ones. It a bit ugly at first but so much more usable: windows don't change place, you can easily replace them using only the keyboard, etc..

If you want to try a WM don't go for dwm: it's "too" simple and you need plenty of other helper scripts (volume control, resolution change, ...), But use a more "advanced" (user friendly) one instead

Re: Ask HN: What's your Linux window manager and/or desktop environment?

#39
I use a different UI depending on my mood.

XFCE, open box, ratpoison, awesomewm, dwm

XFCE and open box are floating. You can set up some key binds to snap windows. Overall I think floating + snaps are superior to pure tiling. I use XFCE when i want a big fat desktop environment. Pure open box for something light.

Sometimes I want pure tiling. ratpoison (manual tiler) is my mainstay for that. Occasionally use awesome or dwm for a dynamic tiler.

Re: Ask HN: What's your Linux window manager and/or desktop environment?

#40

Dwm because it sucks less https://dwm.suckless.org/

I used to use ST, but I got real bored of suckless

  Because dwm is customized through editing its source code, it's pointless to make binary packages of it. This keeps its userbase small and elitist. No novices asking stupid questions. There are some distributions that provide binary packages though.
Post reply on HN