Ask HN: What's your Linux window manager and/or desktop environment?
31–40 of 60 posts
Re: Ask HN: What's your Linux window manager and/or desktop environment?
#32Re: Ask HN: What's your Linux window manager and/or desktop environment?
#33I love tiling WM and would.never go back to "floating" ones. It a bit ugly at first but so much more usable: windows don't change place, you can easily replace them using only the keyboard, etc..
If you want to try a WM don't go for dwm: it's "too" simple and you need plenty of other helper scripts (volume control, resolution change, ...), But use a more "advanced" (user friendly) one instead
Re: Ask HN: What's your Linux window manager and/or desktop environment?
#34Super happy with the Gnome experience. The whole OS feels very professional and polished - reminiscent of OSX, where you still have command line powers.
Re: Ask HN: What's your Linux window manager and/or desktop environment?
#35Re: Ask HN: What's your Linux window manager and/or desktop environment?
#36Re: Ask HN: What's your Linux window manager and/or desktop environment?
#37Re: Ask HN: What's your Linux window manager and/or desktop environment?
#38Re: Ask HN: What's your Linux window manager and/or desktop environment?
#39XFCE, open box, ratpoison, awesomewm, dwm
XFCE and open box are floating. You can set up some key binds to snap windows. Overall I think floating + snaps are superior to pure tiling. I use XFCE when i want a big fat desktop environment. Pure open box for something light.
Sometimes I want pure tiling. ratpoison (manual tiler) is my mainstay for that. Occasionally use awesome or dwm for a dynamic tiler.
Re: Ask HN: What's your Linux window manager and/or desktop environment?
#40Dwm because it sucks less https://dwm.suckless.org/
Because dwm is customized through editing its source code, it's pointless to make binary packages of it. This keeps its userbase small and elitist. No novices asking stupid questions. There are some distributions that provide binary packages though.