Live data from Hacker News

Goodbye Brave

arunmozhi.in

31–40 of 252 posts

Re: Goodbye Brave

#31
post #23

Earlier quoted context omitted.

uBlock origin put Ghostery lite in list of good replacement for people on safari so I'm confused now. https://github.com/el1t/uBlock-Safari/issues/158

uBlock for Safari is run by some mostly unrelated third party, and what you linked specifically is an issue by "ghost".

“ghost” is GitHub’s deleted user placeholder, not somebody affiliated with Ghostery.

Re: Goodbye Brave

#34

Weird that this person doesn’t even consider Firefox, the only browser that lets you have Adblock and other addons on mobile (but not on iOS, sadly).

I find it strange that on threads about Brave people promote Firefox and vice versa, whether it's a positive or negative article. Free software isn't a competition and if it were Mozilla lost to Chromium a long time ago.

Re: Goodbye Brave

#35

Hi author, if you're here on HN please consider ditching sketchy extensions like Ghostery (sells your user data) and Adblock+ (participates in paid bypass of "acceptable ads" program) for the open-source and user-focused uBlock Origin ( https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock ). Also, if you haven't tried Firefox since the quantum days come back and give it another try.

I think it's at least worth having the discussion about "acceptable ads". While reasonable people can disagree, I personally think that unobtrusive advertising that doesn't harvest your data should be a valid business model.

Re: Goodbye Brave

#36

Weird that this person doesn’t even consider Firefox, the only browser that lets you have Adblock and other addons on mobile (but not on iOS, sadly).

> this person doesn’t even consider Firefox

* Firefox main income is the competitor, Google

* Firefox sent telemetry to Google servers after first start

So am I, it doesn't feet in my degoogled life.

Re: Goodbye Brave

#37
post #22
post #14

I cannot understand why technically savvy people keep using spywares like Brave ( https://spyware.neocities.org/articles/brave.html ) or Chrome ( https://spyware.neocities.org/articles/chrome.html ) when we have better alternatives such as Vivaldi ( https://spyware.neocities.org/articles/vivaldi.html ) or Firefox ( https://spyware.neocities.org/guides/firefox.html )

Isn't Vivaldi proprietary? I would cross it off the list as well. Then maybe add qutebrowser, nyxt, and ungoogled-chromium.

While it is technically proprietary I'll ask you to read their statement [0] on the matter. The absolute majority of the code base is open.

[0]: https://vivaldi.com/blog/vivaldi-browser-open-source/

Re: Goodbye Brave

#38
post #31

Earlier quoted context omitted.

uBlock for Safari is run by some mostly unrelated third party, and what you linked specifically is an issue by "ghost".

“ghost” is GitHub’s deleted user placeholder, not somebody affiliated with Ghostery.

I wasn't intending to imply it is (tbh I internalized that as common knowledge), my intended point is the issue with this Ghostery recommendation was created by some random unknown and presumably unrelated Github user.

Re: Goodbye Brave

#39
post #35

Hi author, if you're here on HN please consider ditching sketchy extensions like Ghostery (sells your user data) and Adblock+ (participates in paid bypass of "acceptable ads" program) for the open-source and user-focused uBlock Origin ( https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock ). Also, if you haven't tried Firefox since the quantum days come back and give it another try.

I think it's at least worth having the discussion about "acceptable ads". While reasonable people can disagree, I personally think that unobtrusive advertising that doesn't harvest your data should be a valid business model.

Advertising shits in your head.

Re: Goodbye Brave

#40

Weird that this person doesn’t even consider Firefox, the only browser that lets you have Adblock and other addons on mobile (but not on iOS, sadly).

Does firefox let you install extensions without contacting Mozilla servers? I'm not sure how the extension signing works, but it may fail the same reason they're leaving Brave.

Well they're being hosted on Mozilla's servers so no but FF doesn't in any way require a connection to Mozilla's servers to function.
Post reply on HN