Earlier quoted context omitted.
When did Microsoft not "support" AMD CPUs? It truly would not make any difference if Microsoft "supported" the M1 CPU, as Apple does not sell it to anyone without the rest of Apple computer attached to it. I mean, you can run Windows VMs on M1 computers now, with something like Parallels. But perhaps not more directly, as with Boot Camp? > I would like to see how AMD and Intel can do to change this performance game W…
K6 ? AFAIK "Wintel " is not a joke. MS only cares about intel.
Microsoft Benchmarks Upcoming AMD Milan-X CPU
31–34 of 34 posts
Re: Microsoft Benchmarks Upcoming AMD Milan-X CPU
#32Earlier quoted context omitted.
Apple Services aren't the same as their hardware.
Well, no shit. I was pointing out that they're placing more and more importance on being a services company rather than a hardware/product company. As that emphasis on services grows they'll probably switch to their own silicon for their cloud stuff which their services will run on.
Re: Microsoft Benchmarks Upcoming AMD Milan-X CPU
#33Earlier quoted context omitted.
> But perhaps not more directly, as with Boot Camp? https://www.forbes.com/sites/dwightsilverman/2021/04/14/you-... Obviously you have to run ARM Windows, but it’s indeed Windows.
If I understand this article correctly, as of April 2021, you can run Windows on ARM under Parallels virtualization software, which is a Virtual Machine, or VM. So that's not direct to hardware, which I thought Boot Camp was?
Re: Microsoft Benchmarks Upcoming AMD Milan-X CPU
#34Earlier quoted context omitted.
Well, no shit. I was pointing out that they're placing more and more importance on being a services company rather than a hardware/product company. As that emphasis on services grows they'll probably switch to their own silicon for their cloud stuff which their services will run on.
And I was making the point they aren't even a player on the services market, regardless what their servers run on.